Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Lukas K. Danner
Chapter

Abstract

Following the analyzed nine within-case studies of manifestations of China’s grand strategy, this concluding chapter comprehensively presents the research findings to the reader and revisits the hypotheses of the study. It ends with an examination of possible impact of the findings on International Relations theory, the policy world, and the debate on China’s grand strategy.

References

  1. Blanchard, Ben. 2017. “As Trump Stresses ‘America First,’ China Plays the World Leader.” Reuters (January 25). http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-china-analysis/as-trump-stresses-america-first-china-plays-the-world-leader-idUSKBN1590KJ?il=0. Accessed on March 15, 2017.
  2. Christensen, Thomas J. Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. Denyer, Simon. 2016. “Chinese Censorship: Communist Party and Military at War with Ideas Online.” The Independent (July 11). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/online-in-china-the-communist-party-and-military-are-at-war-with-ideas-a7130681.html. Accessed on July 15, 2016.
  4. Layne, Christopher. “The Influence of Theory on Grand Strategy: The United States and a Rising China.” In Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation, edited by Annette Freyberg-Inan, Ewan Harrison, and Patrick James, 103–135. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Lebow, Richard Ned. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. Mao, Zedong. On Contradiction. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1967 [1937].Google Scholar
  7. Qin, Yaqing. “Continuity and Change: Background Knowledge and China’s International Strategy.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 3 (2014): 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shenkman, Rick. Political Animals: How Our Stone Age Brain Gets in the Way of Smart Politics. New York: Basic Books, 2016.Google Scholar
  9. Studies, Arnold A. Saltzman Institute of War and Peace. 2016. “Robert M. Scher, ‘What’s Old Is New Again: Recasting the Department of Defense for Great Power Competition,’” Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs. https://sipa.columbia.edu/70/events/robert-m-scher-assistant-secretary-of-defense-for-strategy-plans-and-capabilities-whats-old-is-new. Accessed on September 20, 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lukas K. Danner
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations