• Lukas K. Danner


This introductory chapter familiarizes the reader with the topic of the (re-)rise of China and surveys the recent debate on China’s grand strategy. Additionally, it highlights some of the theory that the study uses, such as the concept of grand strategy or Richard Ned Lebow’s focus on the cultural driver of honor. It provides information about the research question and methodology used, as well as the chapter framework.


  1. Art, Robert J. “The Strategy of Selective Engagement.” In The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics, edited by Robert J. Art, and Kenneth N. Waltz, 327–348. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Brands, Hal. What Good Is Grand Strategy? Power and Purpose in American grand Strategy from Harry S. Truman to George W. Bush. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. Buzan, Barry. “The Logic and Contradictions of ‘Peaceful Rise/Development’ as China’s Grand Strategy.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 4 (Winter 2014): 381–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Dingding. “Selective Leadership: China’s New Grand Strategy.” Paper Presented at the Fourth Global International Studies Conference of the World International Studies Committee, Frankfurt/Main, Germany, August 6–9, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Clinton, W. David. The Two Faces of National Interest. New Orleans: Louisiana State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Dueck, Colin. 2006. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eckstein, Harry. “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science. Volume 7, edited by Fred Greenstein, and Nelson Polsby, 79–138. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Fenby, Jonathan. Modern China: The Fall and Rise of a Great Power, 1850 to the Present. New York: Ecco, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Ewan Harrison, and Patrick James, eds. Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. George, Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Boston: The MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. Hill, Christopher. The National Interest in Question: Foreign Policy in Multicultural Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huisken, Ronald. Introducing China: The World’s Oldest Great Power Charts Its Next Comeback. Canberra: Australian National University E-Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyer, Eric. The Pragmatic Dragon: China’s Grand Strategy and Boundary Settlements. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Kapstein, Ethan B., and Michael Mastaduno, eds. Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. Kay, Sean. Global Security in the Twenty-First Century: The Quest for Power and the Search for Peace. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Kohli, Atul, Peter Evans, Peter J. Katzenstein, Adam Przeworski, Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, James C. Scott, and Theda Skocpol. “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium.” World Politics 48, no. 1 (1995): 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Layne, Christopher. “The Influence of Theory on Grand Strategy: The United States and a Rising China.” In Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation, edited by Annette Freyberg-Inan, Ewan Harrison, and Patrick James, 103-135. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. Lebow, Richard Ned. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Lijphart, Arend. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” The American Political Science Review 65, no. 3 (1971): 682–93.Google Scholar
  20. Lobell, Steven E. The Challenge of Hegemony: Grand Strategy, Trade, and Domestic Politics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lobell, Steven E., Norrin M. Ripsman, and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahnken, Thomas G., ed. Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History, and Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  23. Malik, Mohan. China and India: Great Power Rivals. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  24. Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2003.Google Scholar
  25. Pant, Harsh V. China’s Rising Global Profile: The Great Power Tradition. Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  26. Papasotiriou, Charalambos. “Harry.” Byzantine Grand Strategy. Unpublished Dissertation. Stanford, CA: Department of Political Science, Stanford University, 1992.Google Scholar
  27. Qin, Yaqing. “Continuity and Change: Background Knowledge and China’s International Strategy.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 3 (2014): 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenau, James N. “The National Interest.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by David L. Sills, 34–40. New York: Macmillan and The Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  29. Roy, Denny. 2014. “China’s Grand Strategy Is Not Absent, Just Contradictory.” Asia Pacific Bulletin, no. 292 (December 3). Accessed on January 22, 2016.
  30. Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., Norrin M. Ripsman, Steven E. Lobell, eds. The Challenge of Grand Strategy: The Great Powers and the Broken Balance Between the World Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, Brendan. Sanctions as Grand Strategy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
  32. Teufel Dreyer, June. China’s Political System: Modernization and Tradition. 8th edition. New York: Pearson, 2012.Google Scholar
  33. Van Ess, Hans. 2013. “China-Lexikon/Prof. Dr. Hans van Ess über Konfuzius und das Denken Chinas [Encyclopedia of China / Prof. Dr. Hans van Ess about Confucius and Chinese philosophy].” (March 16). Accessed on June 4, 2017.
  34. Van Evera, Stephen. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  35. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. New York: Waveland Press, 2010 [1979].Google Scholar
  36. Wang, Jianwei, and Dingding Chen. “China’s New Grand Strategy in Call: Selective Leadership.” Paper Presented at the International Conference on China’s Grand Strategy and Diplomatic Transformation at the University of Macau, Macau Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China, February 3, 2012.Google Scholar
  37. Yan, Xuetong. “From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 2 (2014): 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zheng, Bijian. “China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’ to Great-Power Status.” Foreign Affairs 84, no. 5 (September/October 2005): 18–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lukas K. Danner
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations