Skip to main content

Habsburg Positivism: The Politics of Positive Knowledge in Imperial and Post-Imperial Austria, 1804–1938

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 862 Accesses

Abstract

In the Habsburg lands “positive knowledge” served as the key framework of liberal science from the 1830s because it permitted its practitioners to trace ineluctable social-political progress. In the 1850s Mill’s version of positivism was translated to the Austrian lands by the classicist Theodor Gomperz. In this chapter traces the rival varieties of positivism across scientific domains (the natural sciences, philology, philosophy, history, law). It demonstrates how Mill’s model of inquiry was refashioned by Ernst Mach and Franz Brentano, by the Vienna Circle (Schlick, Carnap, Neurath), as well as by Hans Kelsen’s critical-democratic legal positivism. The final section analyzes the fin de siècle shipwreck of positivism in conjunction with the collapse of Austrian liberalism whose vision of benign imperial rule, society, and scientific inquiry it had provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fillafer, F.L., Feichtinger, J. (2018). Habsburg Positivism: The Politics of Positive Knowledge in Imperial and Post-Imperial Austria, 1804–1938. In: Feichtinger, J., Fillafer, F., Surman, J. (eds) The Worlds of Positivism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65762-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65762-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65761-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65762-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics