Advertisement

Sustainable Application of Various Monomer/Clay Dispersed Wood Polymer Nanocomposites

  • M. R. RahmanEmail author
  • S. Hamdan
  • J. C. H. Lai
Chapter
Part of the Engineering Materials book series (ENG.MAT.)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the decay resistance of different ratio of ST/MMA/clay monomer system impregnated batai wood polymer nanocomposites (WPNCs) against Trametes versicolor (white-rot) and Chaetomium globosum (soft rot) fungi. Besides, Kumpang wood was impregnated by styrene, 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate (MSPMA), ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), maleic acid (MA), glycidyl methacrylate (GMA), and nanoclay. Overall, both fungi very lightly attacked to the 50:50:5 ST/MMA/clay monomers impregnated WPNCs. 50:50:5 ST/MMA/clay monomer impregnated WPNCs greatly enhance the decay resistance against the both fungi. For Kumpang wood, the raw wood was well impregnated and improved the decay resistance toward Trametes versicolor and Coniphora puteana. Therefore, it is recommended that 50:50:5 ST/MMA/clay monomers impregnated WPNCs as well as ST-co-MSPA-WPC, ST-clay-WPNC, ST-co-MA-WPC, and ST-co-GMA-WPCs are technically suitable for exterior use where both moisture and favorable conditions for fungi development are present. Besides, WPCs at pH8 and pH9 showed higher decay resistance toward Coniphora puteana and Trametes versicolor, respectively.

Keywords

Styrene Clay Trametes versicolor Chaetomium globosum Coniphora puteana 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia with Grant no. (ERGS/02(08)/860/2912(12)) during the research.

References

  1. Akbarpour I, Ghaffari M, Ghasemian A (2013) Deinking of different furnishes of recycled MOW, ONP, and OMG pulps in silicate-free conditions using organic complex of PHASS. BioRes 8(1):31–44Google Scholar
  2. Berix MJA (2012) Encapsulation of clay through non-aqueous dispersion polymerizations. Technische Universitelt Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  3. Billes E (2015) Cellulose oligomers preparation by depolymerization for the synthesis of new bio-based amphiphilic compounds. Universite de Bordeaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. Boryniec S, Przygocki W (1999) Procesyspalaniapolimerow.Cz III. Opoznianiespalaniamaterialowpolimerowych. Polim 10:656–665Google Scholar
  5. Cai J, Guo J, Ji M, Yang W (2007) Preparation and characterization of multiresponsive polymer composite microspheres with core-shell structure. Colloid Polym Sci 285:1607–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao Y, Lu J, Huang R, Zhao Y, Wu Y (2011) Evaluation of decay resistance for steam-heat-treated wood. BioRes 6(4):4696–4704Google Scholar
  7. Chang HT, Chang ST (2001a) Inhibition of the photodiscoloration of wood by butyrylation. Holz 55:255–259Google Scholar
  8. Chang ST, Chang HT (2001b) Comparisons of the photostability of esterified wood. Polym Degrad Stabil 71:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen F, Wu H (2014) Water-resistant material from recovered fibers and acrylic emulsion terpolymer. BioRes 9(1):1148–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen T, Qiu J, Zhu K, He X, Kang X, Dong E (2014) Poly(methyl methacrylate)-functionalized graphene/polyurethane dielectric elastomer composites with superior electric field induced strain. Mater Lett 128:19–22Google Scholar
  11. Clemons CM (2002) Wood-plastic composites in the United States: the interfacing of two industries. Forest Prod J 52(6):10–18Google Scholar
  12. Devi RR, Maji TK (2007) Effect of glycidyl methacrylate on the physical properties of wood-polymer composites. Polym Compos 28(1):1–5Google Scholar
  13. Doczekalska B, Batkowiak M, Zakrzewski R (2014) Esterification of willow wood with cyclic acid anhydrides. Wood Res 59(1):85–96Google Scholar
  14. Donath S, Militz H, Mai C (2004) Wood modification with alkoxysilanes. Wood Sci Technol 38:555–566Google Scholar
  15. Dong X, Sun T, Liu Y, Li C, Li Y (2015) Structure and properties of polymer-impregnated wood prepared by in situ polymerization of relative monomers. BioRes 10(4):7854–7864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duanmu J, Gamstedt EK, Rosling A (2007) Hydromechanical properties of composites of crosslinked allylglycidyl-ether modified starch reinforced by wood fibres. Compos Sci Technol 67:3090–3097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eaton R, Hale MDC (1993) Wood, decay, pests and protection. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Emeydan MA, Cabane E, Gierlinger N, Koetz J, Burgert I (2014) Improvement of wood material properties via in situ polymerization of styrene into tosylated cell walls. RSC Adv 4:12981–12988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esmaeil SP, Qazvini NT, Mahdavi H (2014) Interpenetrating polymer networks (IPN) based on gelatin poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate/clay nanocomposites: Structure-properties relationship. Mater Chem Phys 143(3):1396–1403Google Scholar
  20. Evans PD, Wallis AFA, Owen NL (2000) Weathering of chemically modified wood surfaces: natural weathering of scots pine acetylated to different weight gains. Wood Sci Technol 34:151–155Google Scholar
  21. Eze IO, Obidiegwu MU, Eyarefe SO (2013) The effects of maleic acid on some mechanical and end-use properties of bamboo powder filled low density polyethylene composites. Acad Res Int 4(2):208–217Google Scholar
  22. Feci E, Nunes L, Palanti S, Duarte S, Predieri G, Vignali F (2009) Effectiveness of sol-gel treatments coupled with copper and boron against subterranean termites. Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta SK, Gupta NK, Singhal R, Nagpal AK (2004) Dimensional stability and fungal decay of rubber wood-polymer composites processed by gamma radiation. Ind J Chem Technol 11:243–247Google Scholar
  24. He W, Zhang QS, Jiang SX (2014) Modification of fast growing poplar with styrene and glycidyl methacrylate. Int Wood Prod J 5(2):98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hien NTT, Li S (2012) Effects of water-borne rosin on the fixation and decay resistance of copper-based preservative treated wood. BioRes 7(3):3573–3584Google Scholar
  26. Hill CAS (2006) In wood modification chemical, thermal and other processes. Wiley, EnglandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill CAS, Forster SC, Farahani MRM, Hale MDC, Ormondroyd GA, Williams GR (2005) An investigation of cell wall micropore blocking as a possible mechanism for the decay resistance of anhydride modified wood. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 55:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laks PE, Ritcher DL, Larkin GL (2000) Biological deterioration of wood-based composite panels. Forest Prod Lab 11(4):7–14Google Scholar
  29. Lee WF, Chen CY (2015) Graft copolymerization of 3-(trimethylsilyl) propyl methacrylate onto styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer. J Elastomers Plast 47(2):103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Y, Dong X, Liu Y, Li J, Wang F (2011a) Improvement of decay resistance of wood via combination treatment on wood cell wall: swell-bonding with maleic anhydride and graft copolymerization with glycidyl methacrylate and methyl methacrylate. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 65(7):1087–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li YF, Liu YX, Wang XM, Wu QL, Yu HP, Li J (2011b) Wood-polymer composites prepared by in situ polymerization of monomers within wood. J Appl Polym Sci 119(6):3207–3216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin WC, Yang CH, Wang TL, Shieh YT, Chen WJ (2012) Hybrid thin films derived UV-curable acrylate-modified waterborne polyurethane and monodispersed colloidal silica. eXPRESS Polym Lett 6(1):2–13Google Scholar
  33. Liu PG, Pu WF, Ni JH (2016) Catalytic effect analysis of clay minerals on low-temperature oxidation of crude oil through combined thermal analysis method. Petrol Sci Technol 34(4):343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu JZ, Wu Q, McNabb HS Jr (2000) Chemical coupling in wood fiber and polymer composites: a review of coupling agents and treatments. Wood Fiber Sci 32(1):88–104Google Scholar
  35. Mommaerts V, Platteau G, Boulet J, Sterk G, Smagghe G (2008) Trichoderma-based biological control agents are compatible with the pollinator Bombusterrestris: a laboratory study. Biol Control 46:463–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagaveni HC, Vijayalakshmi G, Chauhan SS (2005) Decay resistance of esterified and oligoesterified rubberwood (hevea brasiliensis). J Trop For Sci 17:588–595Google Scholar
  37. Oldertroen K, Kittikun AH, Phongpaichit S, Riyajan S, Teanpaisal R (2016) Treatment of rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) (Willd. Ex. A. Juss) Mull. Arg. with maleic anhydride to prevent moulds. J For Sci 62(7):314–321Google Scholar
  38. Papadopoulos AN, Hill CAS (2002) The biological effectiveness of wood modified with linear chain carboxylic acid anhydrides against Coniophoraputeana. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 60(5):329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piltonen P, Stoor T, Niinimaki J (2013) The effect of rewetting on the adhesion tendency of styrene-butadiene latices on steel surfaces. Int J Adhes Adhes 40:108–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinnavaia TJ, Beall GW (2000) Polymer-clay nanocomposites. Wiley, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  41. Plakette DV, Dunningham EA, Singh AP (eds) (1996) Weathering of chemically modified wood. In: Hons DNS (ed) Chemical modification of lignocellulosic materials. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 277–294Google Scholar
  42. Pointing SB, Parungao MM, Hyde KD (2003) Production of wood decay enzymes, mass loss and lignin solubility in wood tropical Xylariaceae. Mycol Res 107(2):231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahman MR, Hamdan S, Saleh AA, Islam MS (2010) Mechanical and biological performance of sodium mataperiodate impregnated plasticized wood (PW). BioRes 5(2):1022–1035Google Scholar
  44. Rahman MR, Lai JCH, Hamdan S, Ahmed AS, Baini R, Saleh SF (2013) Combined styrene/mma/nanoclay cross-linker effect on wood-polymer composites (WPCs). BioRes 8(3):4227–4237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rangel-Vazquez NA, Leal-Garcia T (2010) Spectroscopy analysis of chemical modification of cellulose fibers. J Mex Chem Soc 54(4):192–197Google Scholar
  46. Reinsch S, Bocker W, Bucker M, Seeger S, Unger B (2002) Development of wood-inorganic composites with enhanced properties and environment stability. Paper presented at the proceeding of 4th international wood and fiber symposium, Kassel, Germany, 10–11 April 2002Google Scholar
  47. Rowell RM (1983) Chemical modification of wood. Forest Prod Abs 6:363–382Google Scholar
  48. Rowell RM (2005) Chemical modification of wood. In: Rowell RM (ed) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composite. Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, pp 381–420Google Scholar
  49. Rowell RM (2006) Chemical modification of wood: a short review. Wood Mater Sci Eng 1:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sapkota J (2011) Influence of clay modification on curing kinetics of natural rubber nanocomposites. Tampere University of Technology, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  51. Savoy JG (1954) Breakdown of timber by ascomycetes and fungi imperfecti. Ann Appl Biol 41(2):336–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmidt EL, French DW, Gerthejensen RO, Hermann J, Hall H (1978) Strength reductions in particleboard caused by fungi. Forest Prod J 28(2):26–31Google Scholar
  53. Solar R, Reinperchet L, Lang R (2005) Decay resistance of untraditionally compressed beech wood. Faculty of Wood Sciences and Technology Slovakia, ZvolenGoogle Scholar
  54. Sultan MT, Rahman MR, Hamdan S, Lai JCH, Talib ZA (2016) Clay dispersed styrene-co-glycidyl methacrylate impregnated kumpang wood polymer nanocomposites: impact on mechanical and morphological properties. BioRes 11(3):6649–6662Google Scholar
  55. Terziev N, Panov D, Temiz A, Palanti S, Feci E, Daniel G (2009) Laboratory and above ground exposure efficacy of silicon-boron treatments. Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  56. Verhey S, Laks PE, Ritcher DL (2001) Laboratory decay resistance of wood fiber/thermoplastic composites. Forest Prod J 51(9):44–49Google Scholar
  57. Williams RS (2005) Weathering of wood. In: Rowell RM (ed) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, United States of America, pp 142–185Google Scholar
  58. Wu Q, Lei Y, Lian K, Qi Y (2012) Copper/Carbon core shell nanoparticles as additive for natural fiber/wood plastic blends. BioRes 7(3):3213–3222Google Scholar
  59. Yalinkilic MK, Tsunoda K, Takahashi M, Gezer ED, Dwianto W, Nemoto H (1998) Enhancement of biological and physical properties of woof by boric acid-vinyl monomer combination treatment. Holz 52(6):667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zabel RA, Morrell JJ (1992) Wood microbiology—decay and its prevention. Academic Press Inc, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  61. Zabihzadeh SM, Hosseini Hashemi SK, Mehregan Nikoo H, Sepidehdam SMJ (2009) Influence of fungal decay on physico-mechanical properties of a commercial extruded bagasse/PP composite. J Reinf Plast Compos 29(11):1750–1756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou X, Yu Y, Lin Q, Chen L (2013) Effects of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (MAPP) on the physico-mechanical properties and rheological behavior of bamboo powder-polypropylene foamed composites. BioRes 8(4):6263–6279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia SarawakKota SamarahanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations