Advertisement

Nanoclay Dispersed Furfuryl Alcohol-co-Ethyl Methacrylate Wood Polymer Nanocomposites: The Enhancement on Physico-mechanical and Thermal Properties

  • M. R. RahmanEmail author
  • J. C. H. Lai
  • S. Hamdan
Chapter
Part of the Engineering Materials book series (ENG.MAT.)

Abstract

In this study, physical, morphological, mechanical, and thermal properties of furfuryl alcohol/glycidyl methacrylate/halloysite nanoclay wood polymer nanocomposites (FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs) were investigated. FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs were prepared via impregnation method, and the effect of different ratio between the polymers was subsequently investigated. The properties of nanocomposites were characterized by weight percent gain, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), three-point flexural test, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis, and moisture absorption test. The weight percent gain in 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs was the highest compared to raw wood (RW) and other WPNCs. FT-IR results confirmed the polymerization took place in the nanocomposites especially 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs with reducing hydroxyl groups. SEM result revealed that the 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs among all the nanocomposites. Through the three-point flexural test, 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs showed the highest flexural strength and modulus of elasticity. The results revealed that the storage modulus and loss modulus of FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs were higher while the tan δ of FA-co-EHMA-HNC WNPCs was lower compared to RW. FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs exhibited the higher thermal stability through TGA and DSC analysis. 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs exhibited significantly lower moisture absorption compared to RW. Overall, this study proved that the ratio 50:50 FA-co-EHMA was the most suitable to be introduced in the RW.

Keywords

Morphology Strength Thermal Clay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Research and Innovation Management Centre, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak under Fund with Grant no. (F02/SpGS/1443/2016/25) during the research.

References

  1. Ahmad EEM, Luyt AS, Djokovic V (2013) Thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of bio-based poly(furfuryl alcohol)/sisal whiskers nanocomposites. Polym Bull 70(4):1265–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akita K, Kase M (1967) Determination of kinetic parameters for pyrolysis of cellulose and cellulose treated with ammonium phosphate by differential thermal analysis and thermal gravimetric analysis. J Polym Sci Part A 5:833–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown JH, Burnside WR, Davidson AD, DeLong JP, Dunn WC, Hamilton MJ (2011) Energetic limits to economic growth. BioSci 61:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao XV, Ismail H, Rashid AA, Takeichi T, Vo-Huu T (2011) Mechanical properties and water absorption of kenaf powder filled recycled high density polyethylene/natural rubber biocomposites using mape as a compatibilizer. BioRes 6(3):3260–3271Google Scholar
  5. Chanmal CV, Jog JP (2008) Dielectric relaxations in PVDF/BaTiO3 nanocomposites. eXPRESS Polym Lett 2(4):294–301Google Scholar
  6. Cheung H, Ho M, Lau K, Cardona F, Hui D (2009) Natural fibre-reinforced composites for bioengineering and environmental engineering applications. Compos Part B Eng 40:655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ende MT, Peppas NA (1997) Transport of ionisable drugs and proteins in crosslinked poly(acrylic acid) and poly(acrylic acid-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels. II. Diffusion and release studies. J Control Release 48(1):47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasnan MAKD, Husseinsyah S, Lim BY, Abdul Rahman MF (2016) Chemical modification of palm kernel shell filled polylactic acid biocomposite films. BioRes 11(3):6639–6648Google Scholar
  9. Hazarika A, Maji TK (2013) Study on the properties of wood polymer nanocomposites based on melamine formaldehyde-furfuryl alcohol copolymer and modified clay. J Wood Chem Technol 33(2):103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hazarika A, Maji TK (2014) Properties of softwood polymer composites impregnated with nanoparticles and melamine formaldehyde furfuryl alcohol copolymer. Polym Eng Sci 54(5):1019–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Islam MS, Hamdan S, Rusop M, Rahman MR, Ahmed AS, Mohd Idrus MAM (2012) Dimensional stability and water repellent efficiency measurement of chemically modified tropical light hardwood. BioRes 7(1):1221–1231Google Scholar
  12. Ismail H, Nizam JM, Abdul Khalil HPS (2001) The effect of a compatibilizer on the mechanical properties and mass swell of white rice husk ash filled natural rubber/linear low density polyethylene blends. Polym Test 20(2):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ismail H, Edyhan M, Wirjosentono B (2002) Bamboo fiber filled natural rubber composites: the effect of filler loading and bonding agent. J Polym Test 21:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacob M, Varughese KT, Thomas S (2005) Water sorption studies of hybrid biofiber-reinforced natural rubber biocomposites. Biomacromol 6(6):2969–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karlsson JO, Gatenholm P (1996) Solid-supported wettable hydrogels prepared by ozone induced grafting. Polymer 37(19):4251–4256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Komadan C, George KE, Kumar PAS, Varughese KT, Thomas S (2007) Dynamic mechanical analysis of binary and ternary polymer blends based on nylon copolymer/EPDM rubber and EPM grafted maleic anhydride compatibilizer. eXPRESS Polym Lett 1(10):641–653Google Scholar
  17. Kumari R (2008) Dissertation, Kinki UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A (2012) International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486:107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liew FK, Hamdan S, Rahman MR, Mahmood MR, Rahman MM, Lai JCH, Sultan MT (2016) 4-methylcatechol-treated jute-bamboo hybrid composites: Effects of pH on thermo-mechanical and morphological properties. BioRes 11(3):6880–6895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu JZ, Negulescu JI, Wu Q (2005) Maleated wood-fiber/high density polyethylene composites: coupling mechanisms and interfacial characterization. Compos Interf 12(1–2):125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Markarian J (2005) Wood-plastic composites: current trends in materials and processing. Plastic Addit Compound 4:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohd Idrus MAM, Hamdan S, Rahman MR, Islam MS (2011) Treated tropical wood sawdust-polypropylene polymer composite: mechanical and morphological study. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 2:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ndiaye D, Tidjani A (2014) Physical changes associated with gamma doses on wood/polypropylene composites. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 62(1):012025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quintens D, Groeninckx G, Guest M, Aerts L (1990) Mechanical behaviour related to the phase morphology of PC/SAN polymer blends. Polym Eng Sci 30:1474–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahman MR, Hamdan S, Hashim DMA, Islam MS, Takagi H (2015) Bamboo fiber polypropylene composites: effect of fiber treatment and nanoclay on mechanical and thermal properties. J Vinyl Addit Technol 21(4):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Liu Y, Yang GC, Zeng HM (2001) The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 61:1437–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rose WB (2002) Structure and its enclosure. Paper presented at 2002 ACSA technology conference, Portland Oregon, 10–13 Oct 2002Google Scholar
  28. Sharma RK, Chauhan G (2009) Synthesis and characterization of graft copolymers of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and some comonomers onto extracted cellulose for use in separation technologies. BioRes 4(3):986–1005Google Scholar
  29. Sheshmami S, Ashori A, Hamzeh Y (2010) Physical properties of polyethylene-wood fiber-clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 118(6):3255–3259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sulaiman NS, Hashim R, Amini MHM, Sulaiman O, Hiziroglu S (2013) Evaluation of the properties of particleboard made using oil palm starch modified with epichlorohydrin. BioRes 8(1):283–301Google Scholar
  31. Tay CC, Hamdan S, Osman MS (2016) Urea formaldehyde composites reinforced with sago fibres analysis by FTIR, TGA and DSC. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Varughese KT, Nando GB, De PP, De SK (1988) Miscible blends from rigid poly (vinyl chloride) and epoxidized NR. J Mater Sci 23:3894–3900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang T, Sun H, Long J, Wang YZ, Schiraldi D (2016) Biobased poly(furfuryl alcohol)/clay aerogel composite prepared by a free-drying process. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 4(5):2601–2605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zini E, Scandola M (2011) Green composites: an overview. Polym Compos 32:1905–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia SarawakKota SamarahanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations