Skip to main content

The EU–SADC EPA: Road Map and Conflicts (2006–2010)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Trade Policy and Class Dynamics in South Africa

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 350 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter establishes the setting of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) and its concrete regional setting in the South African Development Community. It provides the context of the historical evolution of the EPA, but also outlines the concrete stages of the negotiations and the background. The EPA negotiations have resulted in major conflicts over several trade and development issues as well as diverse positions within the region. The chapter provides insights into the conflict issues within the trade agreement and also within the region. South Africa declined to sign the EPA, while the neighbouring countries agreed on an interim agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Other states, like Zambia, negotiated in the COMESA EPA group, and Tanzania later shifted to the EAC EPA group (Woolfrey 2010: 114).

  2. 2.

    COMESA is a purely economic and trade cooperation agreement, while the SADC also has a political and security dimension in its agenda.

  3. 3.

    Furthermore, not only the SADC but also its counterparts COMESA and the EAC decided in 2008 to establish a joint tripartite free trade area by 2016. However, the negotiation process remains slow (Charalambous 2013).

  4. 4.

    The conflict potential differs from region to region, but while the Cariforum region accepted a full EPA, the SADC EPA group hesitated in including these issues.

References

  • Ashton, Catherine. 2009. Economic Partnership Agreements—Remarks to European Parliament. European Commission: Speech 09/139, March 23, 2009. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-09-139_en.htm. Accessed 13 Jan 2014.

  • Bertelsmann-Scott, Talitha. 2005. The Impact of Economic Partnership Agreement Negotiations on Southern Africa. In Reconfiguring the Compass: South Africa’s African Trade Diplomacy, ed. Peter Draper. Johannesburg: SAIIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocza, Stefan, and Andreas Brocza. 2012. SADC-EU Relations: What Happened to the Berlin Initiative? In Monitoring the Process of Regional Integration in Southern Africa in 2011, ed. Trudi Hartzenberg, Gerhard Erasmus, and André du Pisani, 147–165. Stellenbosch and Windhoek: Trade Law Centre for Southern Africa and Konrad Adenauer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Day. 2008. South Africa: Calling SA’s Bluff. Business Day, December 23. http://allafrica.com/stories/200812230155.html. Accessed 19 May 2012.

  • Carbone, Marurizio. 2013. Rethinking ACP-EU Relations after Cotonou: Tensions, Contradictions, Prospects. Journal of International Development 25 (5): 742–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carim, Xavier. 2017. South Africa, the EU, and the SADC Group Economic Partnership Agreement: Through the Negotiating Lens The ACP Group and the EU Development Partnership. In Beyond the North-South Debate, ed. Annita Montoute and Kudrat Virk, 161–180. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, Lorys. 2013. Call To Speed Up African Tripartite FTA Negotiations. Tax News, March 13. http://www.tax-news.com/news/Call_To_Speed_Up_African_Tripartite_FTA_Negotiations_60077.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2014.

  • Council of the European Union. 2005. Council Decision Concluding the Additional Protocol to the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation between the European Community and Its Member States. EUR-Lex 2006/166/EC, December 21. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006D0166&from=EN. Accessed 3 Nov 2014.

  • Crawford, Gordon. 1996. Whither Lomé? The Mid-Term Review and the Decline of Partnership. The Journal of Modern African Studies 34 (3): 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, David. 2007. TRADE: EPAs Signed ‘Under Duress’ Says South Africa. Inter Press Service News Agency, December 21. http://www.ipsnews.net/2007/12/trade-epas-signed-lsquolsquounder-duressrsquorsquo-says-south-africa/. Accessed 12 Jan 2009.

  • Davies, Rob. 2008a. Bridging the Divide: The SADC EPA. Trade Negotiations Insights 7 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Update on EPA Negotiations. Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Foreign Affairs and Select Committee on Economic and Foreign Affairs, Cape Town, June 18. Parliamentary Monitoring Group. http://www.pmg.org.za. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.

  • ———. 2013. South Africa’s Trade Policy and Strategy Framework (TPSF). Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry, DTI: Pretoria, August 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The SADC EPA and Beyond. GREAT Insights Magazine 3 (9). http://ecdpm.org/great-insights/economic-partnership-agreements-beyond/sadc-epa-beyond/. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.

  • Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). 2016. Briefing to the Parliamentary Committee on the Evolution of EU-ACP Relations and the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) Negotiations, June 20. Department of Trade and Industry. https://www.thedti.gov.za/parliament/2016/Evolution_EPA_negotiations.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2017.

  • Draper, Peter. 2007. EU-Africa Trade Relations: The Political Economy of Economic Partnership Agreements. Jan Tumlir Policy Essays No. 2/2007. Brussels: EICIPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, Peter, and Nkululeko Khumalo. 2009. The Future of the Southern African Customs Union. Trade Negotiations Insights 8 (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, Ole. 2009. From Cotonou to EPA Light: A Troubled Negotiation Process. In Beyond Market Access for Economic Development. EU-Africa Relations in Transition, ed. Gerrit Faber and Jan Orbie, 21–37. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 1996. Green Paper on the Relations Between the European Union and the ACP Countries in the Eve of the 21st Century. Challenges and Options for a New Partnership. COM(96)570 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy. Executive Summary. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/october/tradoc_130380.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2010.

  • Flatters, Frank. 2011. Rules of Origin and the SADC Textiles and Garments Industries. Technical Report submitted to USAID/Southern Africa. South African Trade Hub, Gaborone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, Patrick I. 2013. Reshaping an Asymmetrical Partnership: ACP-EU Relations from an ACP Perspective. Journal of International Development 25 (5): 714–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graumans, Anne. 1997. Redefining Relations Between South Africa and the European Union. An Analysis of the South Africa—European Union Trade and Cooperation Negotiations: 1994–1997. FGD Occasional Paper 10. Australia: Foundation for Global Dialogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grynberg, Roman. 1998. The WTO Incompability of the Lomé Convention Trade Provisions. Working Paper 3/98. Canberra: Asia Pacific School of Economics and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Alan. 2005. Season of Hope. Economic Reforms under Mandela and Mbeki. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobeit, Cord, Trudi Hartzenberg, and Nick Charalambides. 2005. Overlapping Membership in COMESA, EAC, SACU and SADC. Trade Policy Options for the Region and for EPA Negotiations. Eschborn: GTZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian, Melissa. 2007a. EPA Negotiations Update. Trade Negotiations Insight 6 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. EPA Negotiations Update. Trade Negotiations Insight 6 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. EPA Negotiations Update. Trade Negotiations Insight 7 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keet, Dot. 1996. Cap in Hand? South Africa and the European Union. Southern Africa Report 12 (1). http://www.africafiles.org/article.asp?ID=3864. Accessed 10 May 2010.

  • Le Roux, Mathabo. 2009. South Africa May Be Excluded from SADC EPA. Business Day, March 17. http://www.pambazuka.org/governance/southern-africa-sa-may-be-excluded-sadc-epa. Accessed 18 Mar 2009.

  • Lorenz-Carl, Ulrike. 2013. When the ‘Not so Weak’ Bargain with the ‘Not so Strong’: Whose Agency Matters in the Economic Partnership Agreements. In Mapping Agency: Comparing Regionalisms in Africa, ed. Ulrike Lorenz-Carl and Martin Rempe, 61–76. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhan, Davina. 2009. Linking EU Trade and Development Policies: Lessons from the ACP-EU Trade Negotiations on Economic Partnership Agreements. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makombe, Percy F. 2010. Economic Partnership Agreement and SADC: The Controversy Continues. Economic Justice Network, September 27. http://www.ejn.org.za/index.php/ejn-on-the-move/ejn-on-the-move-views/445-economic-partnership-agreement-and-sadc-the-controversy-continues. Accessed 13 Jan 2014.

  • Mandelson, Peter. 2007. Mandelson Urges Final Push in EPA Talks. Remarks to the INTA Committee. European Commission, September 11. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2007/september/tradoc_135910.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2014.

  • McCarthy, Colin, Paul Kruger, and Johan Fourie. 2007. Benchmarking EPA Negotiations Between EU and SADC. Stellenbosch: Tralac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyn, Mareike. 2003. Das Freihandelsabkommen zwischen Südafrika und der EU und seine Implikationen für die Länder der Southern African Customs Union (SACU). Berichte aus dem Weltwirtschaftlichen Colloquium Nr. 82. Bremen: Institut für Weltwirtschaft und Internationales Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntschick, Johannes. 2013. Explaining the Influence of Extra-Regional Actors on Regional Economic Integration in Southern Africa: The EU’s Interfering Impact on SADC and SACU. In Mapping Agency: Comparing Regionalisms in Africa, ed. Ulrike Lorenz-Carl and Martin Rempe, 77–96. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, Eckhardt. 2008. Rules of Origin and EPAs: What Has Been Agreed? What Does It Mean? What Next? Tralac. http://www.bilaterals.org/IMG/pdf/Naumann_Rules_of_Origin_and_EPAs.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2014.

  • Nduru, Moyiga. 2007. Trade-Southern Africa: EU Agreement Has ‘Not Been Beneficial’. Inter Press Service News Agency, April 26. http://ipsnews.net/print.asp?idnews=37501. Accessed 12 Jan 2009.

  • Nzioki, Sam. 2007. TRADE: South Africa Won’t ‘Roll Over’ on Singapore Issues. Inter Press Service, October 13. http://www.ipsnews.net/2007/10/trade-south-africa-won39t-3939roll-over3939-on-singapore-issues/. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.

  • Olympio, John, Peter Robinson, and Matthew Cocks. 2006. The TDCA and SADC-EPA: Is the Risk of Ginving South Africa Duty Free Access Alongside that Offered to the Rest of Southern African Countries Perceived or Real? In Regional Integration and Economic Partnership Agreements, ed. Talitha Bertelsmann-Scott and Peter Draper, 97–138. Johannesburg: SAIIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, Elisabeth. 2013. An Old Partnership in a New Setting: ACP-EU Relations from a European Perspective. Journal of International Development 25 (5): 727–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phiri, Dorica Suvye. 2008. Economic Partnership Agreements and Intellectual Property Rights Protection: Challenges for the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Region. South African Institute of International Affairs, November 10. http://www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/economic-partnership-agreements-and-intellectual-property-rights-protection-challenges-for-the-southern-african-development-community-sadc-region. Accessed 19 Dec 2008.

  • Plant, Manjoy. 2009. The Costs and Benefits to South Africa of Joining the SADC EPA. New Delhi: Centre for International Trade and Development School of International Studies. http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/tradepolicy/Pant_EN_011209_DFID.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.

  • Roux, Wallie. 2007. Response to the Letter ‘This is Not a Poker Game’ by Messrs Peter Mandelson and Louis Michel in Guardian, October 31, 2007. bilaterals.org , November 6. http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?page=print&id_article=10274&lang=en. Accessed 25 Jan 2009.

  • SAIIA. 2009. IPR’s in the EU-CARIFORUM EPA: Lessons for SADC. Roundtable Discussion. South African Institute of International Affairs, March 20. http://www.saiia.org.za/events/iprs-in-the-eu-cariforum-epa-lessons-for-sadc. Accessed 21 May 2009.

  • Spieker, Christoph. 2010. Das freihandelspolitische Projekt der EU gegenüber den afrikanischen AKP-Staaten. In Die Außenbeziehungen der Europäischen Union. Hegemonialer Anspruch und umkämpfte Wirklichkeit, ed. Forschungsgruppe Europäische Integration, 48–88. Marburg: Forschungsgruppe Europäische Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • TradeInvest South Africa. 2007. SA Calls for EPA Conclusion Without Singapore Issues. October 14. http://www.tradeinvestsa.co.za/news/982198.htm. Offline. Accessed 19 Jan 2009.

  • Weidlich, Brigitte. 2008. TRADE: EPA Damages Regional Cooperation in Southern Africa. Inter Press Service News Agency, February 15. http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=41212. Accessed 19 Jan 2009.

  • Weusmann, Johann. 2005. Die Europäische Union und Südafrika. Bilaterale Handelsbeziehungen im Lichte des Gatt und WTO. Hamburger Studien zum Europäischen und Internationalen Recht. Berlin: Ducker & Humboldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfrey, Sean. 2010. State of Play in the SADC-EU EPA Negotiations. In Monitoring Regional Integration in Southern Africa, Yearbook 2009, ed. Anton Bösl, Gerhard Erasmus, Trudi Hartzenberg, and Colin McCarthy. Windhoek: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

List of Interviews

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Claar, S. (2018). The EU–SADC EPA: Road Map and Conflicts (2006–2010). In: International Trade Policy and Class Dynamics in South Africa. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65714-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics