Anti-corruption Institutions: Some History and Theory

Chapter
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

Corruption is a multidimensional problem that has been pervasive through history. Attempts to fight corruption must likewise be multidirectional. The institutions that have been designed in different societies for this purpose include formal laws, special agencies, community organizations, and combinations; their record of success is varied. This paper examines some prominent examples of such effort, with special attention to campaigns like the ones led from the top that transformed Hong Kong and Singapore, and the bottom-up Addiopizzo movement that has for the last decade organized resistance against the Sicilian Mafia’s extortion. The paper suggests some requisites for success of anti-corruption institutions by analogy with the conditions for success of other self-governing institutions that address other issues like contract enforcement, and places these ideas within a general theoretical framework of collective action.

Keywords

Corruption Governance Institutions Development 

References

  1. Acemoglu, Daron., Suresh Naidu, Pascual Restrepo, and James A. Robinson. 2014. Democracy Does Cause Growth. NBER Working Paper 20004, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, Alberto, and Paola Giuliano. 2015. Culture and Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature 53: 898–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, Yuen Yuen. 2016. How China Escaped the Poverty Trap. In Cornell Studies in Political Economy, 19. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Battisti, Michele, Andrea Mario Lavezzi, Lucio Masserini and Monica Pratesi. 2015. Resisting the Extortion Racket: An Empirical Analysis. Discussion Paper 206, University of Pisa, Department of Economics and Management.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, Lisa. 1992. Opting Out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry. The Journal of Legal Studies 21 (1): 115–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2001. Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation Through Rules, Norms, and Institutions. Michigan Law Review 99: 1724–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besley, T., and M. Kudamatsu. 2008. Making Autocracy Work. In Institutions and Economic Performance, ed. E. Helpman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Born, Lester K. 1927. What is a Podestà? American Political Science Review 21: 863–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniele, Gianmarco, and Benny Geys. 2015. Organised Crime, Institutions and Political Quality: Empirical Evidence from Italian Municipalities. Economic Journal 125: F233–F255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Quervain, Dominique, J.F., Urs Fischbacher, Valerie Treyer, Melanie Schellhammer, Ulrich Schnyder, Alfred Buck, and Ernst Fehr. 2004. The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment. Science 305: 1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixit, Avinash. 1986. Comparative Statics for Oligopoly. International Economic Review 27: 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2004. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2007. Evaluating Recipes for Development Success. World Bank Research Observer 22: 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2015a. Corruption: Supply-Side and Demand-Side Solutions. In Development in India: Micro and Macro Perspectives, ed. S. Mahendra Dev and P.G. Babu, 57–68. New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2015b. How Business Community Institutions Can Help Fight Corruption. World Bank Economic Review 29: S25–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixit, Avinash, and Robert Pindyck. 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fehr, Ernst, and Simon Gächter. 2002. Altruistic Punishment in Humans. Nature 415: 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller, Brandon, and Paul Romer. 2012. Success and the City: How Charter Cities Could Transform the Developing World. Ottawa, Canada: Macdonald-Laurier Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Glaeser, Edward, and Claudia Goldin, eds. 2006. Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, Adam M. 2008. Does Intrinsic Motivation Fuel the Prosocial Fire? Motivational Synergy in Predicting Persistence, Performance, and Productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greif, Avner. 1993. Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders Coalition. American Economic Review 83: 525–548.Google Scholar
  22. Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales. 2006. Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heeks, Richard, and Harald Mathisen. 2012. Understanding Success and Failure of Anti-corruption Initiatives. Crime, Law and Social Change 58: 533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Innovations for Successful Societies. 2014. From Underdogs to Watch Dogs: How Anti-corruption Agencies Can Hold Off Potent Adversaries. Princeton University. https://www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties
  25. ———. 2015a. Bringing Government Data into the Light: Slovakia’s Open Data Initiative, 2011–2015. Princeton University. https://www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties
  26. ———. 2015b. A Blueprint for Transparency: Integrity Pacts for Public Works, El Salvador, 2009–2014. Princeton University. https://www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties
  27. Keefer, Philip, and Stuti Khemani. 2016. Media’s Influence on Citizen Demand for Public Goods, Revised Version of “Radios Impact on Preferences for Patronage Benefits. Policy Research Working Paper 6932, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Kingston, Christopher. 2008. Social Structure and Cultures of Corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 67: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mironov, Maxim, and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya. 2016. Corruption in Procurement and the Political Cycle in Tunneling: Evidence from Financial Transactions Data. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 8: 287–321.Google Scholar
  30. Mobarak, A.M. 2005. Democracy, Volatility, and Economic Development. Review of Economics and Statistics 87: 348–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2015. The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nannicini, Tommaso, Andrea Stella, Guido Tabellini, and Ugo Troiano. 2013. Social Capital and Political Accountability. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5: 222–250.Google Scholar
  33. Parker, Edward H. 1903. China, Past and Present. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R.Y. Nanetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Quah, Jon S.T. 2007. Combating Corruption Singapore-Style: Lessons for Other Asian Countries. Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies 2007: 1.Google Scholar
  36. Rangarajan, L.N., ed. 1992. The Arthashastra. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.Google Scholar
  37. Recanatini, Francesca. 2011. Anti-corruption Authorities: An effective Tool to Curb Corruption? In International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, ed. Susan Rose-Akerman and Tina Soreide, 528–570. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Chapter 19.Google Scholar
  38. Rodrik, Dani. 2000. Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them. Studies in Comparative International Development 35: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seade, Jesús K. 1983. Prices, Profits and Taxes in Oligopoly. Research Paper in Economics No. 260, University of Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
  40. Superti, Chiara. 2009. Addiopizzo: Can a Label Defeat the Mafia? Journal of International Policy Solutions 11: 3–11.Google Scholar
  41. Teachout, Zephyr. 2014. Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin’s Snuff Box to Citizens United. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Transparency International. 2016. The Benefits of Anti-corruption and Corporate Transparency. Working Paper #01. Transparency International, Berlin.Google Scholar
  43. Vaccaro, Antonio, and Guido Palazzo. 2015. Values Against Violence: Institutional Change in Societies Dominated by Organized Crime. Academy of Management Journal 58: 1075–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. World Bank. 2016. Making Politics Work for Development: Harnessing Transparency and Citizen Engagement. Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. Yanagizawa-Drott, David. 2014. Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129: 1947–1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations