Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reasoning with Zooarchaeological Counting Units and Statistics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Zooarchaeology

  • 72k Accesses

Abstract

When zooarchaeologists work with aggregate data derived from archaeofaunas to study past human behavior, they are advised to assess whether patterns in their datasets could be products of their own decisions about quantification rather than choices of past humans. Chapter 18 revisits common zooarchaeological counting units in the context of probability theory and statistical tests based on it. It outlines the nature of zooarchaeological variables and the appropriate application of parametric and nonparametric statistical tests to them. It describes potential problems with each of the counting units described in Chap. 10 and notes methods for checking for whether these are a problem within one’s datasets, a topic that will be visited in Chap. 22. It discusses the vexing issue of which measure is best for estimating element and taxonomic abundance. An experimental blind test with large datasets suggests that NISP does not perform so well as other counting units such as MNE as a measure of element and taxonomic abundance, however, the latter is liable to aggregation effects . Chapter 18 briefly reviews a recently proposed alternative to these measures, introduced an alternative measure of element abundance: Number of Distinct Elements (NDE), a landmark-based method for skeletal element quantification that is argued to transcend many of the problems of other measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartosiewicz, L., & Gál, E. (2007). Sample size and taxonomic richness in mammalian and avian bone assemblages from archaeological sites. Archeometriai Műhely, 1, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1978). Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahen, D., & Moeyersons, J. (1977). Subsurface movements of stone artefacts and their implications for the prehistory of Central Africa. Nature, 266, 812–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, M. D. (2013). NISP, bone fragmentation, and the measurement of taxonomic abundance. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20(3), 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casteel, R. W. (1977). Characterization of faunal assemblages and the minimum number of individuals determined from paired elements: Continuing problems in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 4(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costamagno, S. (1999). Stratégies de chasse et fonction des sites au Magdalénien dans le sud de la France. Talence: Université Bordeaux I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crader, D. C. (1984). The Zooarchaeology of the Storehouse and the Dry Well at Monticello. American Antiquity, 49(3), 542–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crader, D. C. (1989). Faunal remains from slave quarter sites at Monticello, Charlottesville, Virginia. Archaeozoologia, 3(1–2), 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (1997). Meat-eating by early hominids at the FLK 22 Zinjanthropus site, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): An experimental approach using cut-mark data. Journal of Human Evolution, 33(6), 669–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducos, P. (1968). L'origine des animaux domestiques en Palestine. Publications de l'Institut de Préhistoire l'Université de Bordeaux, Mémoire 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, J. T., & Gordon, A. D. (2007). Skeletal element abundances in archaeofaunal assemblages: Economic utility, sample size, and assessment of carcass transport strategies. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(6), 872–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, D. P., Isaac, G. L., & Nelson, C. M. (1980). Evidence for predation and pastoralism at prolonged drift, a pastoral Neolithic site in Kenya. Azania, 15, 57–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Boone, C. M., & Reid, R. E. (2013). The fauna from Quiroste: Insights into indigenous foodways, culture, and land modification. California Archaeology, 5(2), 291–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1978). Minimum numbers and sample size in vertebrate faunal analysis. American Antiquity, 43(1), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1979). On the quantification of vertebrate archaeofaunas. In M. B. Schiffer. In Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 199–237). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1981). The effects of sample size on some derived measures in vertebrate faunal analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 8(1), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1984). Quantitative Zooarchaeology. Topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K., & Frey, C. J. (2004). Measuring skeletal part representation in archaeological faunas. Journal of Taphonomy, 2(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Weisler, M., & Faulkner, P. (2015). A refined protocol for calculating MNI in archaeological molluscan shell assemblages: A Marshall Islands case study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 57, 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman, R. C. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of fossil assemblage composition. Paleobiology, 5(2), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G. (1978). Stone age predation on large African bovids. Journal of Archaeological Science, 5(3), 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G. (1979). Stone age exploitation of animals in southern Africa: Middle Stone Age people living in southern Africa more than 30,000 years ago exploited local animals less effectively than the Later Stone Age people who succeeded them. American Scientist, 67(2), 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G. (1981). Stone age predation on small African bovids. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 36(134), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G., & Cruz-Uribe, K. (1991). The bovids from Elandsfontein, South Africa, and their implications for the age, paleoenvironment, and origins of the site. The African Archaeological Review, 9, 21–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (1979). Available meat from faunal remains: A consideration of techniques. American Antiquity, 44(3), 536–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (1994). Quantitative units and terminology in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity, 59(1), 36–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2008). Quantitative Paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2015). On the variable relationship between NISP and NTAXA in bird remains and in mammal remains. Journal of Archaeological Science, 53, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marean, C. W., Abe, Y., Nilssen, P. J., & Stone, E. C. (2001). Estimating the minimum number of skeletal elements (MNE) in zooarchaeology: A review and a new image-analysis GIS approach. American Antiquity, 66(2), 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marean, C. W., & Kim, S. Y. (1998). Mousterian large-mammal remains from Kobeh Cave behavioral implications for Neanderthals and early modern humans. Current Anthropology, 38(S1), S79–S113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marean, C. W., & Spencer, L. M. (1991). Impact of carnivore ravaging on zooarchaeological measures of element abundance. American Antiquity, 56(4), 645–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, F. B. (1990). Cattle herds and caprine flocks. In P. T. Robertshaw (Ed.), Early pastoralists of south-western Kenya (pp. 205–260). Nairobi: British Institute in Eastern Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, F. B., & Pilgram, T. (1993). NISP vs. MNI in quantification of body-part representation. American Antiquity, 58(2), 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. D., Peterson, M. L., & Tiffany, J. A. (1998). Weighing vs. counting: Measurement reliability and the California school of midden analysis. American Antiquity, 63(2), 303–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E., Ready, E., Boileau, A., Beauval, C., & Coumont, M.-P. (2017a). Problems of identification and quantification in archaeozoological analysis, part I: Insights from a blind test. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 886–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9300-4.

  • Morin, E., Ready, E., Boileau, A., Beauval, C., & Coumont, M.-P. (2017b). Problems of identification and quantification in archaeozoological analysis, part II: Presentation of an alternative counting method. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 938–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9301-3.

  • Motulsky, H. J. (1995–2015). Computing the SD, GraphPad statistics guide. http://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/statistics/index.htm?stat_computing_the_sd.htm Accessed 2017.

  • Pickering, T. R., Egeland, C. P., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., Brain, C. K., & Schnell, A. G. (2008). Testing the “shift in the balance of power” hypothesis at Swartkrans, South Africa: Hominid cave use and subsistence behavior in the early Pleistocene. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 27(1), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, T. R., Egeland, C. P., Schnell, A. G., Osborne, D. L., & Enk, J. (2006). Success in identification of experimentally fragmented limb bone shafts: Implications for estimates of skeletal element abundance in archaeofaunas. Journal of Taphonomy, 4(2), 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgram, T., & Marshall, F. B. (1995). Bone counts and statisticians: A reply to Ringrose. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22(1), 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, T. J. (1993). Bone counts and statistics: A critique. Journal of Archaeological Science, 20(2), 121–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft (2013). How to analyze data with low quality or small samples, nonparametric statistics. http://www.statsoft.com/Textbook/Nonparametric-Statistics Accessed 2013, 2017.

  • Thomas, D. H. (1986). Refiguring anthropology: First principles of probability and statistics. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, L. C., & Stanford, D. (1987). Application of conjoined bone data to site structural studies. In J. L. Hofman & J. G. Enloe (Eds.), Piecing together the past: Applications of refitting studies in archaeology, British Archaeological Reports, International Series (Vol. 578). Oxford: Tempus Reparatum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, P. (1982). Conjoinable pieces and site formation processes. American Antiquity, 47(2), 276–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, P., & Courtin, J. (1983). The interpretation of stratified sites: A view from underground. Journal of Archaeological Science, 10(3), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Diane Gifford-Gonzalez

Authors
  1. Diane Gifford-Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gifford-Gonzalez, D. (2018). Reasoning with Zooarchaeological Counting Units and Statistics. In: An Introduction to Zooarchaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65682-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65682-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65680-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65682-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation