Reasoning with Zooarchaeological Counting Units and Statistics
When zooarchaeologists work with aggregate data derived from archaeofaunas to study past human behavior, they are advised to assess whether patterns in their datasets could be products of their own decisions about quantification rather than choices of past humans. Chapter 18 revisits common zooarchaeological counting units in the context of probability theory and statistical tests based on it. It outlines the nature of zooarchaeological variables and the appropriate application of parametric and nonparametric statistical tests to them. It describes potential problems with each of the counting units described in Chap. 10 and notes methods for checking for whether these are a problem within one’s datasets, a topic that will be visited in Chap. 22. It discusses the vexing issue of which measure is best for estimating element and taxonomic abundance. An experimental blind test with large datasets suggests that NISP does not perform so well as other counting units such as MNE as a measure of element and taxonomic abundance, however, the latter is liable to aggregation effects. Chapter 18 briefly reviews a recently proposed alternative to these measures, introduced an alternative measure of element abundance: Number of Distinct Elements (NDE), a landmark-based method for skeletal element quantification that is argued to transcend many of the problems of other measures.
KeywordsQuantitative Sampling Parametric Nonparametric Correlation Regression Rank order correlation NDE
- Bartosiewicz, L., & Gál, E. (2007). Sample size and taxonomic richness in mammalian and avian bone assemblages from archaeological sites. Archeometriai Műhely, 1, 37–44.Google Scholar
- Binford, L. R. (1978). Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Costamagno, S. (1999). Stratégies de chasse et fonction des sites au Magdalénien dans le sud de la France. Talence: Université Bordeaux I.Google Scholar
- Crader, D. C. (1984). The Zooarchaeology of the Storehouse and the Dry Well at Monticello. American Antiquity, 49(3), 542–558.Google Scholar
- Crader, D. C. (1989). Faunal remains from slave quarter sites at Monticello, Charlottesville, Virginia. Archaeozoologia, 3(1–2), 229–236.Google Scholar
- Ducos, P. (1968). L'origine des animaux domestiques en Palestine. Publications de l'Institut de Préhistoire l'Université de Bordeaux, Mémoire 6.Google Scholar
- Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Boone, C. M., & Reid, R. E. (2013). The fauna from Quiroste: Insights into indigenous foodways, culture, and land modification. California Archaeology, 5(2), 291–317.Google Scholar
- Grayson, D. K. (1979). On the quantification of vertebrate archaeofaunas. In M. B. Schiffer. In Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 199–237). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Grayson, D. K. (1984). Quantitative Zooarchaeology. Topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Grayson, D. K., & Frey, C. J. (2004). Measuring skeletal part representation in archaeological faunas. Journal of Taphonomy, 2(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
- Klein, R. G. (1979). Stone age exploitation of animals in southern Africa: Middle Stone Age people living in southern Africa more than 30,000 years ago exploited local animals less effectively than the Later Stone Age people who succeeded them. American Scientist, 67(2), 151–160.Google Scholar
- Klein, R. G., & Cruz-Uribe, K. (1991). The bovids from Elandsfontein, South Africa, and their implications for the age, paleoenvironment, and origins of the site. The African Archaeological Review, 9, 21–79.Google Scholar
- Lyman, R. L. (1994). Quantitative units and terminology in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity, 59(1), 36–71.Google Scholar
- Lyman, R. L. (2008). Quantitative Paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Marean, C. W., Abe, Y., Nilssen, P. J., & Stone, E. C. (2001). Estimating the minimum number of skeletal elements (MNE) in zooarchaeology: A review and a new image-analysis GIS approach. American Antiquity, 66(2), 333–348.Google Scholar
- Marean, C. W., & Kim, S. Y. (1998). Mousterian large-mammal remains from Kobeh Cave behavioral implications for Neanderthals and early modern humans. Current Anthropology, 38(S1), S79–S113.Google Scholar
- Marean, C. W., & Spencer, L. M. (1991). Impact of carnivore ravaging on zooarchaeological measures of element abundance. American Antiquity, 56(4), 645–658.Google Scholar
- Marshall, F. B. (1990). Cattle herds and caprine flocks. In P. T. Robertshaw (Ed.), Early pastoralists of south-western Kenya (pp. 205–260). Nairobi: British Institute in Eastern Africa.Google Scholar
- Mason, R. D., Peterson, M. L., & Tiffany, J. A. (1998). Weighing vs. counting: Measurement reliability and the California school of midden analysis. American Antiquity, 63(2), 303–324.Google Scholar
- Morin, E., Ready, E., Boileau, A., Beauval, C., & Coumont, M.-P. (2017a). Problems of identification and quantification in archaeozoological analysis, part I: Insights from a blind test. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 886–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9300-4.
- Morin, E., Ready, E., Boileau, A., Beauval, C., & Coumont, M.-P. (2017b). Problems of identification and quantification in archaeozoological analysis, part II: Presentation of an alternative counting method. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 938–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9301-3.
- Motulsky, H. J. (1995–2015). Computing the SD, GraphPad statistics guide. http://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/statistics/index.htm?stat_computing_the_sd.htm Accessed 2017.
- Pickering, T. R., Egeland, C. P., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., Brain, C. K., & Schnell, A. G. (2008). Testing the “shift in the balance of power” hypothesis at Swartkrans, South Africa: Hominid cave use and subsistence behavior in the early Pleistocene. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 27(1), 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pickering, T. R., Egeland, C. P., Schnell, A. G., Osborne, D. L., & Enk, J. (2006). Success in identification of experimentally fragmented limb bone shafts: Implications for estimates of skeletal element abundance in archaeofaunas. Journal of Taphonomy, 4(2), 97–108.Google Scholar
- Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- StatSoft (2013). How to analyze data with low quality or small samples, nonparametric statistics. http://www.statsoft.com/Textbook/Nonparametric-Statistics Accessed 2013, 2017.
- Thomas, D. H. (1986). Refiguring anthropology: First principles of probability and statistics. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Todd, L. C., & Stanford, D. (1987). Application of conjoined bone data to site structural studies. In J. L. Hofman & J. G. Enloe (Eds.), Piecing together the past: Applications of refitting studies in archaeology, British Archaeological Reports, International Series (Vol. 578). Oxford: Tempus Reparatum.Google Scholar