Advertisement

ISO 14001 Adoption and Environmental Performance: The Case of Manufacturing in Sweden

  • Thomas ZobelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Measuring Operations Performance book series (MEOP)

Abstract

Environmental management systems based on the international standard ISO 14001 have become widespread in companies globally during the last two decades. This chapter aims to contribute knowledge as to which companies are most likely to adopt ISO 14001, environmental frontrunners or poor performers in need of effective approaches. In addition, the chapter aims to assess the impact of ISO 14001 on concrete environmental performance. The context in focus in this study is manufacturing companies in Sweden. The study focuses on changes in performance over a period of 12 years and includes both ISO 14001-certified companies and non-certified companies. The analysis has been carried out using statistical methods for five different environmental areas: air emissions, water emissions, resource use, energy use and waste. In none of these environmental areas have we been able to find any significant differences between certified and non-certified companies regarding performance improvement prior to ISO 14001-certification or the corresponding period in non-certified companies. Certain positive concrete effects as a result of the ISO 14001 adoption have been found but, in general, the standard seems to have limited effect on the improvement of corporate environmental performance. There are many examples in the literature that ISO 14001 has been successful under certain circumstances but at the same time it seems that ISO 14001-certification does not appear to be a guarantee of neither superior environmental performance nor concrete environmental improvements.

Keywords

ISO 14001 Environmental management system Environmental performance Manufacturing Sweden Market signaling 

References

  1. Barla P (2007) ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper Industry. J Environ Econ Manage 53:291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bethia RM, Duran BS, Boullion TI (1995) Statistical methods for engineers and scientists, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Boiral O, Guillaumie L, Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Valery Tayo Tene C (2017) Adoption and outcomes of ISO 14001: a systematic review. Int J Manage Rev 1–22 (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (2005) Statistics for experimenters: design, discovery and innovation. Wiley-Interscience, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  5. Darnall N, Sides S (2008) Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental programs: does certification matter? Policy Stud J 36:95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Commission (2015) Eco-management and audit scheme: reports and statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/register/reports/reports.do;jsessionid=X9whrE8BojI6ZhwV_0dQCgfuqWANZqXLCVDDT9n1eoslo7NwQ-bV!-1719577194. Accessed 12 Aug 2015
  7. Florida R, Davison D (2001) Gaining from green management: environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. Calif Manage Rev 43:64–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghisellini A, Thurston DL (2005) Decision traps in ISO 14001 implementation process: case study results from Illinois certified companies. J Clean Prod 13:763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gomez A, Rodriguez MA (2011) The effect of ISO 14001 certification on toxic emissions: an analysis of industrial facilities in the North of Spain. J Clean Prod 19:1091–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta M, Piero T (2003) Environmental business is good business. Ind Manage 45(5):14–19Google Scholar
  11. Hamschmidt J, Dyllick T (2001) ISO 14001—profitable? Yes! But is it ecoeffective? Greener Manage Int 34:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Boiral O (2013) ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: towards a research agenda on management system standards. Int J Manage Rev 1:47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heras I, Dick GPM, Casadesús M (2002) ISO 9000 registration’s impact on sales and profitability: a longitudinal analysis of performance before and after accreditation. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 19(6):774–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Dogui K, Boiral O (2013) Shredding light on ISO 14001 certification audits. J Clean Prod 51:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Molina-Azorìn JF, Dick GPM (2011) ISO 14001 certification and financial performance. J Clean Prod 19:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hertin J, Berkhout F, Wagner M, Tyteca D (2008) Are EMS environmental effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies. J Environ Plan Manage 51:259–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Organization for Standardization (2017) ISO survey 2015. https://www.iso.org/the-iso-survey.html. Accessed 18 June 2017
  18. International Organization for Standardization (2015) ISO 14001:2015 environmental management systems—requirements with guidance for use. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnstone N, Labonne J (2009) Why do manufacturing facilities introduce environmental management systems? Improving and/or signaling performance. Ecol Econ 68:719–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad Manage J 48:1091–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lomax RG (2007) Statistical concepts: a second course. L. Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthews DH (2001) Assessment and design of industrial environmental management systems. PhD dissertation, Carnegie Mellon UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Meisner Rosen C (2001) Environmental strategy and competitive advantage. Calif Manage Rev 43(3):8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nawrocka D, Parker T (2009) Finding the connection: environmental management systems and environmental performance. J Clean Prod 17:601–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nishitani K, Kaneko S, Fujii H, Komatsu S (2012) Are firms’ voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms. J Environ Manage 105:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pawar WM, Risetto C (2001) A tool for improvement: environmental management systems. Public Manage 83:10–17Google Scholar
  27. Poksinska B, Dahlgaard JJ, Eklund J (2003) Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits and comparisons with ISO 9000. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 20(5):585–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rivera-Camino J (2003) What motivates European firms to adopt environmental management systems? Eco Manage Audit 8(3):134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schylander E, Zobel T (2003) Environmental effects of EMS: Evaluation of the evidence. In: Proceedings of evaluation of sustainability European conference—EASY-ECO 2, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17Google Scholar
  30. Spence AM (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87:355–374Google Scholar
  31. Terlaak AK (2007) Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors. Acad Manage Rev 32:968–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Testa F, Rizzi F, Daddi T, Marzia Gusmerotti N, Frey M, Iraldo F (2014) EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance. J Clean Prod 68:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thode HC (2002) Testing for normality. Marcel Dekker, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toffel MW (2005) Voluntary environmental management initiatives: smoke signals or smoke screens? PhD dissertation, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  35. Welch EW, Mori Y, Aoyagi-Usui M (2002) Voluntary adoption of ISO 14001 in Japan: mechanism, stages and effects. Bus Strategy Environ 11:43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Business Administration and Industrial EngineeringLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations