Skip to main content

A Framework Model of Black Masculinities and Desistance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Prison Masculinities

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

In this chapter, I present a ‘framework model of black masculinities and desistance’, which is informed by the results and findings of my doctoral study (Glynn 2013), combined with on-going field work in relation to incarcerated black men.Throughout this chapter, I use the term ‘black’ to refer to individuals of African descent who are living in the UK. Desistance is increasingly conceptualised as a theoretical construct which is used to explain how offenders orient themselves away from committing crimes. Previous studies suggest that successful desistance occurs due to one or a number of factors. These factors include things such as faith (Giordano et al. 2007), gender (Giordano et al. 2002), psychosocial processes (Healy 2010), a rite of passage (Maruna 2010), personal and social circumstances which are space and place specific (Flynn 2010), moral rehabilitation (McNeill 2012), turning points (Carlsson 2012), ethnicity and faith (Calverley 2013), relationality (Weaver 2013), and race and racialisation (Glynn 2014). The absence of critical perspectives on race and racialisation when theorising about desistance is problematic for a number of reasons. To address this issue, Russell (2002) has previously called for the development of ‘black criminology’, while Phillips and Bowling (2003) argue for ‘minority perspectives’ within in so-called mainstream criminology. Glynn (2017) further states that race and racialisation of the criminal justice system (CJS) invariably impacts on the desistance aspirations of black offenders on both personal and structural levels and calls for a move towards a ‘critical race criminology’ (CRC) as a possible way forward. The framework that is outlined in this chapter asserts that successful desistance for black men is bound up in navigating a range of masculine transitions within the context of differential racialisation that operates within the wider CJS. Bell (1995) sees differential racialisation as the way the dominant society racialises different groups, in different ways and in different times, in relation to structures such as the CJS. I argue in this chapter that these masculine transitions are situated and contextualised within the worldviews of black men that are shaped by the negative experiences they have faced within the CJS as a whole (Alexander 2010). The findings of my study also reveal how these same black men understand the CJS treats them less fairly (Glynn 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim crow – Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baraka, A. (1963). Blues people: Negro music in white America. New York: William Morrow & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, J. (2002). Masculinities and culture. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. (1996). Pathways to manhood – Young black males struggle for identity. New Jersey: University Press for New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2002). The colour of crime. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calverley, A. (2013). Cultures of desistance: Rehabilitation, reintegration, and ethnic minorities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, C. (2012). Using ‘turning points’ to understand processes of change in offending. Notes from a Swedish study of life-courses and crime. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. (1965). Dark ghetto – Dilemmas in social power. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity – Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1999). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of colour. M Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W. E. (1991). Shades of black: Diversity in African-American identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W. E. B. (1938). The souls of black folk. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, J., & Traylor, L. (2015). Dealing with difference in desistance theory: The promise of Intersectionality for new avenues of inquiry. Sociology Compass, 9(4), 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1952). Black skin, white masks. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, N. (2010). Criminal behaviour in context – Space, place, and desistance from crime. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, E. (1957). Black bourgeoisie. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, P. (1987). ‘The myth of black criminality’, in ‘There Ain’t no black in the Union Jack. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P., Cernkovich, A., & Rudolph, J. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. AJS, 107(4), 990–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P., Longmore, M., Schroeder, R., & Seffrin, P. (2007). A life course perspective on spirituality and desistance from crime. Bowling Green: The Center for Family and Demographic Research: Bowling Green State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. (2005). Passages – Black men, masculinity, and the search for a contemporary rite of passage. MA Thesis, U.C.E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. (2013). The racialisation of crime/criminal justice systems and it’s impacts on the desistance process. Doctoral Thesis, Birmingham City University, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. (2014). Black men, invisibility and crime – Towards a critical race theory of desistance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. (2017). Towards a crirical race Criminology (Unpublished Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golberg, D. (2009). The threat of race: Reflections of racial neoliberalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, W., & Cobbs, P. (1968). Black rage. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. (2010). The dynamics of desistance – Charting pathways through change. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill-Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (2003). We real cool: Black men and masculinity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, E. (1994). The association of black male image. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebow, E. (1967). Tally’s corner – A study of negro corner men. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, G. (2006). The possessive investment in whiteness – How white people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia: Temple.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majors, R., & Billson, J. (1992). Cool pose: The dilemma’s of black manhood in America. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriot, D. (2000). On black men. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good – How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2010). Reentry as a rite of passage. Punishment and Society, 1, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matua, A. (2006). Progressive black masculinities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, M. (1999). Race to incarcerate. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story. London: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. (1988). Power, intimacy, and the life story. London: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of offender rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F., & Weaver, B. (2010). Travelling hopefully: Desistance research and probation practice. In J. Brayford, F. Cowe, & J. Deering (Eds.), What else works? Creative work with offenders. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. (2003). Masculinities and crime in criminological theory past and present, Cullen and Agnew (pp. 430–440). California: Roxbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Masculinities and crime – Beyond a dualist criminology. Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., & Bushbay, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C., & Bowling, B. (2003). Racism, ethnicity, and criminology: Developing minority perspectives. British Journal of Criminology, 43(2), 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietila, A. (2010). Not in my neighbourhood. Chicago: Ivan R Dee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, K. (2002). Development of a black criminology: The role of the black crimnologist. In S. Gabbidon, H. Greene, & V. Young (Eds.), African American classics in criminology and criminal justice. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, M. (1997). The slumbering volcano. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., & Wilson, J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P. (2008). The intergenerational transmission of context. AJS, 113(4), 931–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Messinger, S. L. (1960). The inmate social system. In R. A. Cloward (Ed.), Theoretical studies in social organization of the prison (pp. 5–19). New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, B. (2013). Desistance, reflexivity and relationality: A case study. European Journal of Probation University of Bucharest, 5(3), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. (2007). Understanding race and crime. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1993). Race matters. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (2004). Democracy matters. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winlow, S. (2004). Masculinities and crime. Criminal Justice Matters, 55(1), 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glynn, M. (2018). A Framework Model of Black Masculinities and Desistance. In: Maycock, M., Hunt, K. (eds) New Perspectives on Prison Masculinities. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65654-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65654-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65653-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65654-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics