Skip to main content

Methods and Methodologies for the Study of Emotions in World Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Researching Emotions in International Relations

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations ((PSIR))

Abstract

This chapter outlines a multidisciplinary and pluralist framework for the study of emotions in world politics. Needed is not a systematic theory of emotions, but a more open-ended sensibility that could conceptualize the influence of emotions even where and when it is not immediately apparent. It then becomes possible to combine seemingly incompatible methods, from ethnographies to surveys and from interviews to discourse and content analyses. The logic through which these methods operate do not necessarily have to be the same, nor do they have to add up to one coherent whole, for it is precisely through such creative openness that we can hope to capture the complex yet pervasive role emotions play in world politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for inst ance, Åhäll and Gregory, 2015; Bially Mattern, 2011; Booth and Wheeler, 2007; Callahan, 2004; Edkins, 2003; Eznack, 2011 and 2013; Fierke, 2013; Hall, 2011; Holmes, 2015; Jeffery, 2014a; Koschut, 2014; Mercer, 2005, 2010; Petersen, 2002; Ross, 2014; Sasley, 2011; Saurette, 2006; Solomon, 2012; Tuathail, 2003.

References

  • Åhäll, L., & Gregory, T. (Eds.). (2015). Emotions, Politics and War. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C., & Huysmans, J. (2014). Critical Methods in International Relations: The Politics of Techniques, Devices and Acts. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 596–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bially Mattern, J. (2011). A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations. In E. Adler & V. Pouliot (Eds.), International Practices (pp. 63–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bially-Mattern, J. (2014). On Being Convinced: An Emotional Epistemology of International Relations. International Theory, 6(3), 589–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. (2000). Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. (2014). Visual Assemblages: From Causality to Conditions of Possibility. In M. Acuto & S. Curtis (Eds.), Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations (pp. 75–82). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. (2015). Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 872–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R., & Butler, S. (2016). Radical Dreaming: Indigenous Art and Cultural Diplomacy. International Political Sociology, 10(1), 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker R., & Hutchison E. (2007). Understanding Emotions in World Politics: Reflections on Method. Working Paper No 5, Department of International Relations, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R., & Hutchison, E. (2008). Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics. Review of International Studies, 34(S1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, L. (2005). Making Connections and Thinking Through Emotions: Between Geography and Psychotherapy. Transactions of the Institute for British Geographers, 30, 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K., & Wheeler, N. J. (2007). The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation, and Trust in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2004). National Insecurities: Humiliation, Salvation and Chinese Nationalism. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 29(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costigliola, F. (2012). Roosevelt’s Lost Alliances: How Personal Politics Helped Start the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. C. (2000). The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotions and Emotional Relationships. International Security, 24(4), 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. C. (2014). Instituionalizing Passion in World Politics: Fear and Empathy. International Theory, 6(3), 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Landa, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1996). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, K., & Neumann, I. B. (2016). Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edkins, J. (2003). Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eznack, L. (2011). Crises as Signals of Strength: The Significance of Affect in Close Allies’ Relationships. Security Studies, 20(2), 238–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eznack, L. (2013). The Mood Was Grave: Affective Dispositions and States’ Anger-Related Behaviour. Contemporary Security Policy, 34(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (2002). Against Method (3rd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierke, K. M. (2013). Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotion in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierke, K. M. (2014). Emotions and Intentionality. International Theory, 6(3), 563–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. H. (2011). We Will Not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing the Diplomacy of Anger. Security Studies, 20(4), 521–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. (2006). Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (2003). The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. (2013). The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions. International Organizations, 67(4), 829–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. (2015). Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly, 59(4), 706–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. (2014). A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity After the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology, 8(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. (2016). Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions After Trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2008). Emotions in the War on Terror. In A. J. Bellamy, R. Bleiker, S. E. Davies, & R. Devetak (Eds.), Security and the War on Terror (pp. 57–70). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2014). Theorizing Emotions in World Politics. International Theory, 6(3), 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2015). Grief and the Transformation of Collective Emotions After War. In L. Åhäll & T. Gregory (Eds.), Emotions, Politics and War (pp. 210–222). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, R. (2014a). Reason and Emotion in International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, R. (2014b). The Promise and Problems of the Neuroscientific Approach to Emotions. International Theory, 6(3), 584–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R., Lebow, R. N., & Stein, J. G. (1985). Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, B. (2011). Henry Kissinger: The Emotional Statesman. Diplomatic History, 35(4), 587–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschut, S. (2014). Emotional (Security) Communities: The Significance of Emotion Norms in Inter-Allied Conflict Management. Review of International Studies, 40(3), 553–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the Social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, R. (2011). The Turn to Affect: A Critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 434–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. A. (1988). Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (2002). Emotions in Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 221–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Davies, K. (2009). Coming to Our Senses? A Critical Approach to Sensory Methodology. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (2011). New Directions for Experimental Work in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (1996). Approaching Emotion in International Politics. Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, April 25, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (2005). Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization, 59(1), 77–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (2010). Emotional Beliefs. International Organization, 64(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (2014). Feeling Like a State: Social Emotions and Identity. International Theory, 6(3), 515–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. D. (2002). Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred and Resentment in Twentieth Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pile, S. (2010). Emotions and Affect in Recent Human Geography. Transactions of the Institute for British Geographers, 35, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protevi, J. (2009). Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somantic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics, Translated and Introduction by Gabriel Rockhill. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockhill, G. (2009). The Politics of Aesthetics: Political History and the Hermeneutics of Art. In G. Rockhill (Ed.), Jacques Rancière (pp. 195–215). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2008). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. A. G. (2006). Coming in From the Cold: Emotions and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 12(2), 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. A. G. (2014). Mixed Emotions: Beyond Hatred in International Conflict. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasley, B. (2010). Affective Attachments and Foreign Policy: Israel and the 1993 Oslo Accords. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 687–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasley, B. (2011). Theorizing States’ Emotions. International Studies Review, 13(3), 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurette, P. (2006). You Dissin Me? Humiliation and Post 9/11 Global Politics. Review of International Studies, 32(3), 495–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. J. (2003). Methods and Nations: Cultural Governance and the Indigenous Subject. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. J. (2013). Studies in Trans-disciplinary Method: After the Aesthetic Turn. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002). Vision of Politics, Vol. 1, Regarding Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Small, D. A., Lerner, J. S., & Fischhoff, B. (2006). Emotion Priming and Attributions for Terrorism: Americans’ Reactions in a National Field Experiment. Political Psychology, 27(2), 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, T. (2012). ‘I Wasn’t Angry Because I Couldn’t Believe It Was Happening: Affect and Discourse in Response to 9/11. Review of International Studies, 38(4), 907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thien, D. (2005). After or Beyond Feeling? A Consideration of Affect and Emotion in Geography. Area, 37(4), 450–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect. Geogrfiska Annaler: Series B, 86(1), 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuathail, G. Ó. (2003). “Just Out Looking For a Fight”: American Affect and the Invasion of Iraq. Antipode, 35(5), 856–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (Eds.). (2004). The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bleiker, R., Hutchison, E. (2018). Methods and Methodologies for the Study of Emotions in World Politics. In: Clément, M., Sangar, E. (eds) Researching Emotions in International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics