Franchised States and Ownershipping

  • Niels Nagelhus Schia
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

How does peacebuilding organize people within systems of power and authority? In this book I address the ways in which current global peacebuilding processes challenge established notions of the state and different conceptions of sovereignty. Adopting a studying-through approach further enabled me to trace aspects and activities across several organizational levels and geographical sites during fieldwork: (i) the UN Security Council, (ii) peacebuilding bureaucracy and policy-making in DPKO in New York, and (iii) the implementation level and peacebuilding process in Liberia. Peacebuilding activities turned Liberia into an object of governing. This produced certain paradoxical processes, whereby the UN, in seeking to build the state, also became the state. By viewing this through anthropological perspectives on organizations and sovereignty, it was possible to think of peacebuilding as a method of distributing concepts and ideas about states and state capacities and of Liberia as a franchised state. While sovereign states are generally perceived to be the main building blocks of the international system, and thus also the most common departure for studies of the international system, I conversely put the international system in the foreground for attention and analysis. In this way I allow the anthropological approach to function as a form of criticism. By approaching this system backwards, it is possible to detect, describe, and interpret taken-for-granted assumptions.

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. d’Azevedo, Warren L. 1962. Some Historical Problems in the Delineation of a Central West Atlantic Region. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 96: 512–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 1969. A Tribal Reaction to Nationalism (Part 1). Liberian Studies Journal 1 (2): 1–22.Google Scholar
  4. Bartelson, Jens. 2014. Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Berdal, Mads, and Dominik Zaum. 2013. Power after Peace. In Political Economy of Statebuilding: Power after Peace, ed. Mads Berdal and Dominik Zaum, 1–14. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1979. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Douglas, Mary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ferguson, James. 2006. Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  10. Heyman, Josiah McC. 1995. Putting Power in the Anthropology of Bureaucracy: The Immigration and Naturalization Service at the Mexico–United States Border. Current Anthropology 36 (2): 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2004. The Anthropology of Power-Wielding Bureaucracies. Human Organization 63 (4): 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holland, Ben. 2010. Sovereignty as Dominium? Reconstructing the Constructivist Roman Law Thesis. International Studies Quarterly 54: 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Long, Norman. 2001. Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meeker, Michael E. 1980. The Twilight of a South Asian Heroic Age: A Rereading of Barth’s Study of Swat. Man 15 (4): 682–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moran, Mary H. 2006. Liberia: The Violence of Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murphy, William P., and Caroline H. Blesoe. 1987. Kinship and Territory in the History of a Kpelle Chiefdom (Liberia). In The African Frontier: The Reproduction of Traditional African Societies, ed. Igor Kopytoff. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. de Renzio, Paolo, Lindsay Whitfield, and Isaline Bergamaschi. 2008. Reforming Foreign Aid Practices: What Country Ownership is and What Donors Can Do to Support it. Global Economic Governance Programme Briefing Paper, University of Oxford, Department of Politics and International Relations.Google Scholar
  18. Richards, Paul, ed. 2005. No War No Peace: An Anthropology of Contemporary Armed Conflicts. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
  19. Tonkin, Elisabeth. 2002. Settlers and their Elites in Kenya and Liberia. In Elite Cultures: Anthropological Perspectives, ed. Cris Shore and Stephen Nugent, 129–145. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. UN DPKO/DFS. 2008a. United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: Principles and Guidelines. New York: UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Support. Accessed January 5, 2014. http://pbpu.unlb.org/pbps/library/capstone_doctrine_eNg.pdf
  21. ———. 2008b. Policy Directive Civil Affairs. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niels Nagelhus Schia
    • 1
  1. 1.NUPIOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations