Skip to main content

Systematic Approach to Quality Assessment of Hierarchy Structure in Education for Management Decision Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science (CIT&DS 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 754))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A systematic way of assessment of overall quality of the complex hierarchy structure is presented. These qualities form marketability of implementation of foreign students’ pre-university training educational programs for ultimate management decision-making. Overall quality of the system is formed through experimentally established individual qualities in accordance with the levels of hierarchy by means of their resultant according to the functional Kolmogorov–Nagumo average. The system analyzed is presented in the form of 4-level structure with 19 parametrical variables, which define 15 system attributes. Quality assessment presented was realized in the form of MathCad files that were organized according to the hierarchy structure of the system. As main criteria to be evaluated several properties were selected with consideration of three criteria: marketability of the brand of the educational institution in the educational services market; the potential of the teaching staff participating in the realization of the educational program and financial stability of the educational program. This approach allows an immediate registration of changes in expert assessment in order to minimize subjective aspect of the decision made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clarke, M.: The sublime objects of education policy: quality, equity and ideology. Discourse: Stud. Cult. Polit. Educ. 35(4), 584–598 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L.: The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness: A Contribution to Policy, Practice and Theory in Contemporary Schools. Routledge, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L.: Developing, testing, and using theoretical models for promoting quality in education. School Eff. Sch. Improv. 26(1), 102–119 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrington, J.: The desirability function. Ind. Qual. Control 21, 494–498 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kidalov, N.A., Volchkov, V.M., Knyazeva, A.S.: Optimization of mixture composition for foundry. In: Kravets, A., Shcherbakov, M., Kultsova, M., Shabalina, O. (eds.) CIT&DS 2015. CCIS, vol. 535, pp. 342–354. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_27

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolmogorov, A.N.: Matematika i mekhanika. Izbrannye Trudy. Nauka, Moscow (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Romiszowski, A.J.: Designing Instructional Systems: Decision Making in Course Planning and Curriculum Design. Routledge, Abingdon (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Heararchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York City (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saaty, T.L.: Prinyatiye reshenii. Metod analiza ierarchiy. Radio I svyaz, Moscow (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty, T.L.: Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network Process. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas 102(2), 251–318 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Skordoulis, M., Chalikias, M., Koniordos, M.: Students’ satisfaction from their educational context through DREEM and LOT-R. In: Kravets, A., Shcherbakov, M., Kultsova, M., Iijima, T. (eds.) JCKBSE 2014. CCIS, vol. 466, pp. 113–122. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11854-3_11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tereliansky, P.V.: Extrapolation of Dynamic Systems of Expert’s Preferences. The Measurement of Attitude. Chicago Univesity of Chicago Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksey Godenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Godenko, A., Tarasova, I., Volchkov, V., Styazhin, V. (2017). Systematic Approach to Quality Assessment of Hierarchy Structure in Education for Management Decision Making. In: Kravets, A., Shcherbakov, M., Kultsova, M., Groumpos, P. (eds) Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science. CIT&DS 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 754. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65551-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65551-2_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65550-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65551-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics