Conclusion: Where to from Here for Professional Journalism?

Chapter

Abstract

In the concluding chapter of this book, ‘Where To From Here for Professional Journalism?’ (Chapter 8), Bossio turns to the future of journalism in a post-truth world. Reflecting on all the changes that use of social media has brought to individual journalism practice, organisations and the institutional knowledge that characterises journalism’s social role, Bossio suggests social media has contributed to the changing constitution of journalism through the creation of new cultures of communication, where the roles of participants and the rules of engagement are still being negotiated. The future of journalism therefore depends on how journalists negotiate the various organisational, political, social and cultural influences that seek to structure, regulate and influence the ways news is produced and understood.

References

  1. Albeanu, C. (2017, April 8). Optimising for trust: Advice for news organisations to improve their relationship with the public. Journalism.co.uk. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/optimising-for-trust-advice-for-news-organisations-to-improve-their-relationship-with-the-public/s2/a702368/.
  2. Boczkowski, P. (2004). The processes of adopting multimedia and interactivity in three online newsrooms. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 197–213.Google Scholar
  3. Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dodds, A., & Vir, J. (2016). The future for news brands in an increasingly distributed and fragmented world. Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism. Retrieved from http://digitalnewsreport.org/essays/2016/future-news-brands-increasingly-distributed-fragmented-world/.
  5. Hare, K. (2017, April 18). Local Edition: What do journalists need to stop doing to survive? Poynter. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/2017/local-edition-what-do-journalists-need-to-stop-doing-to-survive/456300/.
  6. Howard, P. N., Bradshaw, S., Kollanyi, B., Desigaud, C., & Bolsover, G. (2017). Junk News and bots during the French Presidential Election: What are French voters sharing over Twitter? Comprop Data Memo. Retrieved from http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/04/What-Are-French-Voters-Sharing-Over-Twitter-v9.pdf.
  7. Kramer, M. (2017, February 14). Meet the wildly popular blogger chronicling President Trump one day at a time. Poynter. Retrieved from https://www.poynter.org/2017/meet-the-wildly-popular-blogger-chronicling-president-trump-one-day-at-a-time/448894/.
  8. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., & Fontaine, C. (2017). How youth navigate the news landscape. Knight Foundation. Retrieved from https://kf-site-production.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/pdfs/000/000/230/original/Youth_News.pdf.
  9. Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news and the role of media literacies in ‘post-fact’ society. American Behavioural Science. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0002764217701217?journalCode=absb.
  10. Shaw, F., Burgess, J., Crawford, K., & Bruns, A. (2013). Sharing news, making sense, saying thanks. Australian Journal of Communication. 40(1) , 23–39.Google Scholar
  11. World Economic Forum. (2014). The rapid spread of misinformation online. Outlook on the Global Agenda. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/outlook-14/top-ten-trends-category-page/10-the-rapid-spread-of-misinformation-online/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swinburne UniversityHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations