Skip to main content

Relational Methods in Organization Studies: A Critical Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Organizational studies research often falls into the trap of dealing with individuals, organizations, and the macro context in which they are placed independently. Relational perspectives seek to counteract this tendency in organization studies by proposing an approach to research which captures the complexity of organizational phenomena by exploring them as irreducibly interconnected sets of relationships. In this chapter, we do not only examine the essentials of ontology and epistemology of relational methods but also provide examples from field studies which are underpinned by relational thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ariss, A. A. (2009). Careers of Skilled Immigrants: A Study of the Capital Accumulation and Deployment Experiences of the Lebanese in France. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyler, M., & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties That Split Pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, W., & Irwin, S. (2003). Locating Difference: Class, ‘Race’ and Gender, and the Shaping of Social Inequalities. The Sociological Review, 51(4), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction (trans: Niche, R.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant Objectivation. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, R. (1998). Relational Construction of Meaning in Emerging Organization Contexts. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. M. B. (2000). Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring the Space Between. Organization Science, 11(5), 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. A. (2003). Building Social Capital: Civil Attitudes and Behavior of Public Servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, R. M., Conrad, C. A., & King, M. C. (2002). The Complexities and Potential of Theorizing Gender, Caste, Race and Class. Feminist Economics, 8(2), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (trans: Kaufmann, W.). Edinburgh: Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buris, V. (2004). The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo, L. A. (2006). Knowledge Integration in Turbulent Environments: A Relational Perspective. In O. Kyriakidou & M. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies (pp. 221–243). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., & Khatchadourian, D. (2003). Empathy, Ways of Knowing, and Interdependence as Mediators of Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward Hate Speech and Freedom of Speech. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Women of Color at the Center: Selections from the Third National Conference on Women of Color and the Law: Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Saussure, F. (1966). Introduction. In C. Bally, A. Sechehaye, & A. Riedlinger (Eds.), Course in General Linguistics (pp. 645–657). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J. (2002). Organizational Research and the Praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1), 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, J. (2009). Insurance Relationship as Relational Contract and the Fairly Debatable Rule for First-Party Bad Faith. Law Review, 46, 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forson, C. (2007). Social Embeddedness, ‘Choices’ and Constraints in Small Business Start-up: Black Women in Business. PhD Thesis, Queen Mary University London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, A. M. (2008). Negative Emotions in Supervisory Relationships: The Role of Relational Models. Human Relations, 63(3), 355–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. G., Cartwright, B., Winston, S. M., & Borzuchowska, B. (2003). A Transcultural Integrative Model for Ethical Decision Making in Counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81(3), 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry: Tensions and Transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Landscapes of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues (pp. 575–610). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W. A., & Callery, P. (2001). Pearls, Pith and Provocation: Enhancing the Rigor of Grounded Theory: Incorporating Reflexivity and Relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer Gittel, J. (2006). Relational Coordination: Coordinating Work Through Relationships of Shared Goals, Shared Knowledge and Mutual Respect. In O. Kyriakidou & M. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies (pp. 74–94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • İnal, G. (2008). A Comparative Study of the Reasons for and Means of Setting-up a Small Business: The Case of Turkish Cypriot Restaurateurs and Lawyers in North Cyprus and Britain. PhD Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, B., Gregor, F., Foster, S., & Denney, D. (1999). Theorizing about Nurses’ Work Lives: The Personal and Professional Aftermath of Living with Healthcare ‘Reform’. Nursing Inquiry, 6, 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S.-Y. (2001). Codependence and Interdependence: Cross-Cultural Reappraisal of Boundaries and Relationality. Pastoral Psychology, 50(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakidou, O. (2006). Identity Orientation and Networking: A Relational Framework for Understanding Attitudes Toward Change Implementation. In O. Kyriakidou & M. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies (pp. 28–55). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakidou, O., & Özbilgin, M. (2006). Introduction. In O. Kyriakidou & M. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies (pp. 1–7). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1990). The Realist Image in Social Science. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1993). New Strategies in Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. F., Heugens, P. P. M. A., & Lamertz, K. (2004). Social Networks and Non-market Strategy. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2), 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malach Pines, A. (2006). Stress and Burnout: A Relational Perspective. In O. Kyriakidou & M. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies (pp. 95–111). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2004). The Political Challenge of Relational Space: Introduction to the Vega Symposium. Geografiska Annaler, 86(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauthner, N., & Doucet, A. (2000). Reflections on a Voice-centred Relational Method: Analysing Maternal and Domestic Voices. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives (pp. 119–146). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, L. (2004). Masculinity, Identity and Labour Market Change: Some Reflections on the Implications of Thinking Relationally about Difference and the Politics of Inclusion. Geografiska Annaler, 86(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. W. (2000, August). Bourdieu’s Relational Method in Theory and Practice. Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association Meetings. In a Special Session organized by David Swartz entitled ‘Cultural Producers and Politics: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu’, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. A. (2004). Beyond Small-is-Beautiful: A Buddhist and Feminist Analysis of Ethics and Business (Global Development and Environment Institute Working Paper, No. 04-01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Özbilgin, M. (1998). A Cross-National Study of Sex Equality in the Financial Services Sector in Turkey and Britain. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özbilgin, M. (2006). Relational Methods in Organisation Studies. In O. Kyriakidou & M. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies (pp. 244–264). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paliadelis, P., & Cruickshank, M. (2008). Using a Voice-Centered Relational Method of Data Analysis in a Feminist Study Exploring the Working World of Nursing Unit Managers. Qualitative Health Research, 18(10), 1444–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peetz, D. (2002). Decollectivist Strategies in Oceania. Relations Industrielle, 57(2), 252–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, P., & Shotwell, A. (2009). Relational Understanding and White Antiracist Praxis. Sociological Theory, 27(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, G. (2000). For Bourdieu, Against Alexander: Reality and Reduction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P., & Pringle, J. K. (2006). Handbook of Workplace Diversity. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M. E., & Gross, M. A. (2003). Welcome to Your Experience: Where You Can Check Out Ant Time You’d Like, But You can Never Leave. Journal of Business and Management, 9(3), 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, R. (1999, March 9). Need for Speed. Intelligent Enterprise, 2(4), 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, D. R., Ayvaz, M. T., & Gorman, M. D. (2006). Relational Perspectives on Collective Learning and Knowledge Creation. In O. Kyriakidou & M. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies (pp. 56–73). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. R. (1998). Symposium on Historical Sociology and Rational Choice Theory: “We’re No Angels”: Realism, Rational Choice and Relationality in Social Science. The American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 722–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storrie, R. (2003). Equivalence Personhood and Relationality: Processes of Relatedness Among the Hoti of Venezuelan Guiana. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and Power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietel, E. (2000). The Interview as a Relational Space. Forum: Qualitative Social Research – Theories, Methods Applications, 1(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyner, J. A. (2002). Geographics of Identity: The Migrant Experiences of Filipinas in Northeast Ohio. Asian Pacific Viewpoint, 43(3), 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, L. (1996). Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. London: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassilopoulou, J. (2011). Understanding the Habitus of Managing Ethnic Diversity in Germany. A Multilevel Relational Study. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weskott, M. (1990). Feminist Criticism of the Social Sciences. In J. McCarl Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences (p. 471). London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, R. (1999). Structure, Agency and School Effectiveness: Researching a ‘Failing’ School. Educational Studies, 25(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietlow, R. E. (2000). Beyond the Pronoun: Toward and Anti-Subordinating Method of Process. Texas Journal of Women and the Law, 10(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Özbilgin, M., Vassilopoulou, J. (2018). Relational Methods in Organization Studies: A Critical Overview. In: Ciesielska, M., Jemielniak, D. (eds) Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics