Skip to main content

The Russian Vodka Prohibition of 1914 and Its Consequences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dual Markets

Abstract

Tsar Nicholas II banned vodka sales in 1914 for the duration of World War I. Believing that sobriety would result in an orderly recruitment process for the army and eliminate the drunkenness damaging public health, he failed to anticipate the negative unintentional consequences that ensued. The ban resulted in eliminating one-third of the state’s revenue at a time when it was most needed to support a prolonged war. Public demand for vodka resulted in grain being used to make samogon (moonshine). The reduction in available grain resulted in bread shortages in cities. On Women’s Day, March 8, 1917, women, workers, and students joined mass street demonstrations protesting food shortages, culminating in the abdication of the tsar a week later. When Vladimir Lenin seized power in November 1917, he retained Prohibition and took violent measures against moonshiners, realizing that feeding the urban masses was essential to retaining their loyalty. Josef Stalin created a State Vodka Monopoly to generate state revenue. In 1985, Michael Gorbachev drastically reduced the availability of vodka, resulting again in the production of moonshine and his unpopularity. Boris Yeltsin abolished the State Vodka Monopoly in 1992. Vladimir Putin continues to face rising male mortality rates, largely attributed to vodka consumption. Current tastes in drinking and a judicious tax policy hold out the hope of reducing the deleterious public health consequences of alcohol abuse in Russia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wine and beer were exempt unless local governments forbade all alcohol and most did. Other nations passed liquor bans as part of the war effort: France forbade absinthe for the duration, Belgium limited liquor sales, Australia limited pub hours, and Britain passed a series of local laws designed to reduce drinking opportunities (McGirr 2016, p. 32).

  2. 2.

    See Christian (1995, pp. 117–118): timetable of restrictions and then relaxing of liquor laws in Russia between 1893 and 1925.

  3. 3.

    The American diplomat George F. Kennan (1904–2005) was a cousin twice removed of George Kennan (b. 1846).

  4. 4.

    http://today-in-wwi.tumblr.com/post/100564078885/vodka-permanently-banned-in-russia accessed August 14, 2016.

  5. 5.

    Weissman (1986, p. 362): “Poorly distilled brew … often contained a high proportion of toxic fuel oil and harmful additives like tobacco, henbane, cocaine, benzine, kerosene and even sulphuric acid.”

  6. 6.

    For a history of reforms of vodka taxation in the period of the Great Reforms, see Christian (1990, pp. 353–81).

  7. 7.

    That is not to say that government ministries agreed on their preferences for increasing revenue or reducing vodka consumption. From the 1860s on, the Ministry of Internal Affairs attempted to limit the number of taverns and reduce drunkenness by other means because public disorder and crime were associated with drunkenness, while the Ministry of Finance attempted to maximize revenue by expanding sites for vodka sales (Abbott 2016, pp. 87–100).

  8. 8.

    The monopoly was supposed to be a tool for curbing increased drunkenness. It was instituted when Russia embarked on a large industrialization project in the 1890s, so that increasing revenue was also a motive, although it was an unstated goal.

  9. 9.

    Nicholas II, like Leo Tolstoy, advocated abstinence. Each had confessed to consuming too much alcohol in his youth. But as they grew older, both continued to drink wine, then not considered a strong alcoholic drink but renounced vodka, which they considered to be ruining the health of the Russian people.

  10. 10.

    Despite the closeness of the Russian Orthodox Church and the state in tsarist Russia, the religious temperance societies were not under the aegis of the state. Many of them were highly critical of the regime because of its vodka monopoly and because the state did not advocate total abstinence (Herlihy 2002, pp. 69–89).

  11. 11.

    See Herlihy (2002, pp. 132–139) for discussions of laws concerning vodka enacted by the Third Duma (1907–1912).

  12. 12.

    There were 431 attendees, ranging from clerics to socialists, with many physicians, women, priests, teachers, members of local governmental boards (zemstva), and Duma members. Some 20 socialists were arrested at the meeting.

  13. 13.

    “In the nineteenth century, government revenues from vodka were the major single source of government revenue, accounting on average for 30% of all ordinary revenue” (Christian 1995, p. 89). For a survey of the various forms of governmental taxes on vodka in tsarist times, see Kotsonis (2014) and Herlihy (2006).

  14. 14.

    Other historians also link the Prohibition of 1914 with the February 1917 Revolution (see Herlihy 2002, pp. 142–145, 162; Christian 1995, p. 116).

  15. 15.

    Village “petitions from across the empire flooded government offices asking to close local drinking establishments and state liquor shops” Frank 1999, p. 296).

  16. 16.

    Segal (1987, p. 119): “Objective data show that the 1914 Dry Law directly and drastically lowered the level of drunkenness in Russia.” Reports claimed that there were fewer asylum inmates, fires, and accidents, lost workdays, pledges at pawnshops, brawls, and less domestic violence and higher church attendance. Hercod (1919, pp. 9–22) based some of these findings on a survey of 1780 rural inhabitants taken by the Poltava Statistical Bureau. Going without vodka for family celebrations and hospitality appeared to be the most difficult thing for many, but they claimed to have adjusted after a while. They consumed more tea, kvass, syrups, lemonade, and even cocoa.

  17. 17.

    Some wives were petitioning the government to let their husbands on the front have a ration of vodka. In March 1916, Nicholas II relented a bit by allowing weak wine to be sold at the front.

  18. 18.

    The city known in English as St. Petersburg was changed to Petrograd in 1914, the start of World War I, because its original name sounded too German.

  19. 19.

    Stone (1986, p. 374): “A direct relationship existed between the output of moonshine and the disparity in the prices of agricultural and industrial products. Whenever the gap widened, as it did in 1922–1923 and in 1927–1928, the volume of moonshine grew.”

  20. 20.

    As early as 1918 in Petrograd, Bolshevik authorities meted out 10-year prison sentences to moonshiners. Sentences were reduced to 5 years’ hard labor in 1919 (see Williams 1991, p. 75).

  21. 21.

    Williams (1991, p. 353): “During the summer of 1923 over half the prisoners in Moscow jails were home brewers.”

  22. 22.

    There were opponents to the vodka monopoly such as Commissariat of Health N.I. Semashko, who indignantly asserted that “fiscal considerations [should] in no way dominate over the interests of the population for health and proper socialist development” (Weissman 1986, pp. 354–355).

  23. 23.

    https://www.ceicdata.com/en/blog/russia-alcohol-excise-duties accessed February 12, 2017.

  24. 24.

    “For Russians, Bleak Times at Home,” https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/27/opinion/for-russians-bleak-realities-at-home.html, accessed February 12, 2017.

  25. 25.

    See Herlihy (1991) for details about how deeply embedded in Russian culture drinking vodka had become over the centuries and the rites and rituals associated with the consumption of vodka.

  26. 26.

    Falyakhov (2016), quoting Alexandra Burdyak, a senior researcher at RANEPA (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration). This author has noted that in Soviet times she was always offered vodka when visiting Russians. In the last decade or two, wine has been offered more frequently.

References

  • Abbott, R. J. (2016). Alcohol controls and Russian politics 1863–1876.Russian History, 43(2), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butov, M. (2014). Sobering effect: What happened when Russia banned booze. Retrieved 11 May 2017, fromhttps://www.rbth.com/opinion/2014/08/15/sobering_effect_what_happened_when_russia_banned_booze_39045.html

  • Christian, D. (1990).‘Living water’: Vodka and Russian society on the eve of emancipation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, D. (1995). Prohibition in Russia 1914–1925.Australian Slavonic and East European Studies, 9(2), 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempseyjan, J. (2009, January 16). Study looks at mortality in post-soviet era.The New York Times. Retrieved 21 Feb 2017, fromhttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/world/europe/16europe.html

  • Falyakhov, R. (2016).Sales of vodka in Russia dropping ‘catastrophically’. Retrieved fromhttp://www.upi.com/Business_News/2016/10/26/Sales-of-vodka-in-Russia-dropping-catastrophically/7501477504852/

  • Figes, O. (1996).A people’s tragedy: The Russian revolution 1891–1924. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S. P. (1999).Crime, cultural conflict and justice in rural Russia, 1856–1914. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, L. (1997, December 7). Russia losing a war on alcoholism.Newsday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronskiĭ, P. P., & Astrov, N. I. (1929).The war and the Russian government: The central government. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hercod, R. (1919).La prohibition de l’alcool en Russie. Westerville: American Issue Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy, P. (1991). ‘Joy of the Rus’: Rites and rituals of Russian drinking.The Russian Review, 50(2), 131–147.https://doi.org/10.2307/131155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy, P. (2002).Alcoholic empire: Vodka and politics in late imperial Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy, P. (2006). Revenue and revelry on tap: The Russian Tavern. In M. P. Holt (Ed.),A social and cultural history of alcohol. Oxford/New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. F. (1990).Politics and public health in revolutionary Russia, 1890–1918. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Increased Alcohol Excise Duties Hardly Affect Spirits Consumption in Russia | CEIC. (2013, March 8). Retrieved 12 Feb 2017, fromhttps://www.ceicdata.com/en/blog/russia-alcohol-excise-duties

  • Kennan, G. (1914). Prohibition in Russia.The Outlook, 875–878. Retrieved fromhttps://www.unz.org/Pub/Outlook-1914dec16-00875?View=PDF

  • Kotsonis, Y. (2014).States of obligation: Taxes and citizenship in the Russian empire and early Soviet Republic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDonne, J. P. (1976). Indirect taxes in Catherine’s Russia. II, the liquor monopoly.Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 24(2), 174–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean, R. B. (1990).St. Petersburg between the revolutions: Workers and revolutionaries, June 1907–February 1917. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGirr, L. (2016).The war on alcohol: Prohibition and the rise of the American state. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meylakhs, P. (2017). The current state of the world heroin markets. In E. U. Savona, M. A. R. Kleiman, & F. Calderoni (Eds.),Dual markets – Comparative approaches for regulation (pp. 21–35). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaev, V. (2015). Impact of a new alcohol policy on homemade alcohol consumption and sales in Russia.Alcohol and Alcoholism, 50(3), 365–372.https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv008

  • Raikhel, E. (2016).Governing habits: Treating alcoholism in the Post-Soviet Clinic. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, B. (1987).Russian drinking: Use and abuse of alcohol in pre-revolutionary Russia. New Brunswick: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlapentokh, D. (1991). Anarchy and drunkenness in Russia: A case of political culture.Russian History/Histoire Russe, 18(4), 477–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H. (1986). The Soviet Government and Moonshine, 1917–1929.Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique, 27(3–4), 359–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarschys, D. (1993). The success of a failure: Gorbachev’s alcohol policy, 1985–88.Europe-Asia Studies, 45(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Transchel, K. (2006).Under the influence: Working class drinking, temperance and cultural revolution in Russia, 1895–1932. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudolyubov, M. (2016, December 27). For Russians, bleak realities at home.New York Times. Retrieved fromhttps://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/27/opinion/for-russians-bleak-realities-at-home.html

  • Vidani, P. (2014, October 21). Vodka Permanently Banned in Russia. Retrieved fromhttp://today-in-wwi.tumblr.com/post/100564078885/vodka-permanently-banned-in-russia

  • Weissman, N. (1986). Prohibition and alcohol control in the USSR: The 1920s campaign against illegal spirits.Soviet Studies, 38(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (1996).Russia goes dry: Alcohol, state and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (1991). Old habits die hard: Alcoholism in Leningrad under N.E.P. and some lessons for the Gorbachev administration.Irish Slavonic Studies, 12, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, S. (Ed.). (1990). The memoirs of count Witte (trans). Armonk:Sidney Harcave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, E. (2013). Peers and alcohol: Evidence from Russia.SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2873428. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved fromhttps://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2873428

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Herlihy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herlihy, P. (2017). The Russian Vodka Prohibition of 1914 and Its Consequences. In: Savona, E., Kleiman, M., Calderoni, F. (eds) Dual Markets. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65361-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65360-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65361-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics