Skip to main content

Prostate Cancer Survivorship Programmes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

The searches identified 2495 papers. However, only 43 mapped to the search terms and eligibility criteria. The current systematic reviews were examined to gain further knowledge about the subject. Six hundred and fifteen papers were excluded due to not conforming to eligibility criteria or adding to the evidence on the components of a survivorship programme. Most of these exclusions were related to active therapy for prostate cancer or were secondary research. One thousand seven hundred and sixty one were duplicates. Of the 43 papers left, relevant abstracts were identified and the full papers obtained (all of which were in English), to quality assure against criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity of design among the included studies therefore a narrative synthesis of the evidence was undertaken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Galbraith ME, Arechiga A, Ramirez J, Pedro LW. Prostate cancer survivors’ and partners’ self-reports of health-related quality of life, treatment symptoms, and marital satisfaction 2.5-5.5 years after treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:E30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galbraith ME, Fink R, Wilkins GG. Couples surviving prostate cancer: challenges in their lives and relationships. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011;27:300–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldfarb S, Mulhall J, Nelson C, Kelvin J, Dickler M, Carter J. Sexual and reproductive health in cancer survivors. Semin Oncol. 2013;40(6):726–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goonewardene SS, Nanton V, Young A, Makar A. The Worcestershire prostate cancer survivorship programme: a new concept for holistic long term care and follow-up. BJU Int. 2014;113:116–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goonewardene SS, Persad R, Young A, Makar A. Re: Liam Bourke, Stephen Gilbert, Richard Hooper, et al. Lifestyle changes for improving disease-specific quality of life in sedentary men on long-term androgen-deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2014;65:865-72. Eur Urol. 2014;66:e51–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goonewardene SS, Young A, Symons M, Sullivan A, McCormack G, Milner V, Makar A. The prostate cancer survivorship program: a new concept for holistic long-term support and follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(5 Suppl):72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham J, Kirkbride P, Cann K, Hasler E, Prettyjohns M. Prostate cancer: summary of updated nice guidance. BMJ (Online). 2014;348:f7524.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graziottin A, Trombetta C, Ciciliato S, Wiesenfeld U. Psychosexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Urodinamica. 2001;11:60–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Green HJ, Steinnagel G, Morris C. Using the commonsense and transtheoretical models to understand health behaviours after diagnosis with prostate or breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2011;20:271–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gudbergsson SB, Fossa SD, Dahl AA. A study of work changes due to cancer in tumor-free primary-treated cancer patients. A NOCWO study. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:1163–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guest G, Macqueen K, Namey E. Applied thematic analyis. London: SAGE Publications; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Gutnick D, Reims K, Davis C, Gainforth H, Jay M, Cole S. Brief action planning to facilitate behavior change and support patient self-management. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 2014;21:17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hagen S, Glazener C, Boachie C, Buckley B, Cochran C, Dorey G, Grant A, McDonald A, McPherson G, Moore K, N’Dow J, Ramsay C. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: association with route and technique of operation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21:S25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall B. Participatory action research: an approach for change. Convergence. 1975;3(2):24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Han M, Trock BJ, Partin AW, Humphreys EB, Bivalacqua TJ, Guzzo TJ, Walsh PC. The impact of preoperative erectile dysfunction on survival after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106:1612–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanly N, Juraskova I. Sexual adjustment and self-perception in men following prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2011;1:S332.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hanly N, Mireskandari S, Juraskova I. The struggle towards ‘the New Normal’: a qualitative insight into psychosexual adjustment to prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2014;14:56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harrington A, Bradley S, Jeffers L, Linedale E, Kelman S, Killington G. The implementation of intentional rounding using participatory action research. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19:523–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harrington CB, Hansen JA, Moskowitz M, Todd BL, Feuerstein M. It’s not over when it’s over: long-term symptoms in cancer survivors-a systematic review. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2010;40:163–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris CJ, Anderson CB, Dietrich MS, Barocas DA, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Smith JA Jr, Clark PE, Herrell SD, Kaufman MR. Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy: identification of trajectory cluster groups. J Urol. 2014;1:e337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris CR, Punnen S, Carroll PR. Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2013;190:981–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, Mason M, Matveev V, Wiegel T, Zattoni F, Mottet N. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65:124–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heidenreich A, Epplen R, Thuer D, Van Erps T, DAVID D. EAU guideline on clinically localized prostate cancer: compliance among urologists concerning diagnosis, staging and treatment. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10(2):113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heldenbrand SD, Turnbow LE, Payakachat N. Patient self-efficacy and satisfaction after medication education following solid organ transplantation. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30(10):425e.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Horton MFP. We make the road by walking; conversations on education and social change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:761–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson R. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. In: Onuwegbuzie W, editor. Educational researcher; 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones LW, Hornsby WE, Freedland SJ, Lane A, West MJ, Moul JW, Ferrandino MN, Allen JD, Kenjale AA, Thomas SM, Herndon IJE, Koontz BF, Chan JM, Khouri MG, Douglas PS, Eves ND. Effects of nonlinear aerobic training on erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular function following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65:852–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kardas P, Mazurkiewicz M. Patients’ assessment of point-of-care sensors for a telemedicine system for type 2 diabetes mellitus management: a focus-group study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15:A106–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kendirci M, Bejma J, Hellstrom WJG. Update on erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients. Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16:186–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan NF, Mant D, Rose PW. Quality of care for chronic diseases in a British cohort of long-term cancer survivors. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8:418–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kilminster S, Muller S, Menon M, Joseph JV, Ralph DJ, Patel HRH. Predicting erectile function outcome in men after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012;110:422–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kimura M, Bañez LL, Polascik TJ, Bernal RM, Gerber L, Robertson CN, Donatucci CF, Moul JW. Sexual bother and function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of sexual bother recovery in men despite persistent post-operative sexual dysfunction. Andrology. 2013;1(2):256–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. King AJ, Evans M, Moore TH, Paterson C, Sharp D, Persad R, Huntley AL. Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men’s experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(5):618–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Goonewardene, S.S., Persad, R. (2018). Prostate Cancer Survivorship Programmes. In: Prostate Cancer Survivorship . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65358-7_93

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65358-7_93

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65357-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65358-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics