Advertisement

Quality Assessment of Studies: Systematic Review on Prostate Cancer Survivorship and Psychosexual Care

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
  • Raj Persad
Chapter

Abstract

Qualitative studies were assessed using [1]. All studies (n = 17) described withdrawal and dropout rates. They also presented clear and appropriate methods and outcomes. Blinding was not applicable in any study, as there were no randomised clinical trials. The flow of participants was represented in a ‘consort style’ diagram in 17 studies. Allocation concealments of participants were not appropriate. Greater than 80% of participants did provide follow-up data of interest. No studies had sample size calculated statistically. An adequate summary of results for each study outcome was provided in all studies. Sampling was explicitly defined, as was the method of recruitment and intervention.

References

  1. 1.
    Frew G, Dashfield E. Testing care pathways for prostate cancer survivors. Nurs Times. 2012;108:30–1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ploussard G, Salomon L, Parier B, Abbou CC, de la Taille A. Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience beyond the learning curve. World J Urol. 2013;31:447–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP, Roth AJ. The association between erectile dysfunction and depressive symptoms in men treated for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2011;8:560–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pavlovich CP, Levinson AW, Su LM, Mettee LZ, Feng Z, Bivalacqua TJ, Trock BJ. Nightly vs on-demand sildenafil for penile rehabilitation after minimally invasive nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a randomized double-blind trial with placebo. BJU Int. 2013;112:844–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel JM, Sundararajan V. Practice of epidemiology: updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:676–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raina R, Agarwal A, Allamaneni SSR, Lakin MM, Zippe CD. Sildenafil citrate and vacuum constriction device combination enhances sexual satisfaction in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;65:360–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104:2689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raina R, Lakin MM, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Goyal KK, Montague DK, Klein E, Zippe CD. Long-term effect of sildenafil citrate on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: 3-year follow-up. Urology. 2003;62:110–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raina R, Pahlajani G, Agarwal A, Zippe CD. The early use of transurethral alprostadil after radical prostatectomy potentially facilitates an earlier return of erectile function and successful sexual activity. BJU Int. 2007;100:1317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rajendran R, Cummings M. Erectile dysfunction: assessment and management in primary care. Prescriber. 2014;25:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reason P. The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. In: Bradbury H, editor. California: Sage; 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reilly DF, McNeely MJ, Doerner D, Greenberg DL, Staiger TO, Geist MJ, Vedovatti PA, Coffey JE, Mora MW, Johnson TR, Guray ED, Van Norman GA, Fihn SD. Self-reported exercise tolerance and the risk of serious perioperative complications. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
    • 1
  • Raj Persad
    • 2
  1. 1.The Royal Free Hospital and UCLLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.North Bristol NHS TrustBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations