Skip to main content

Strategies for Relating to the Personal and Societal Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imagined Futures

Part of the book series: Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty ((CRSTRU))

Abstract

While the previous chapter presented an overview of popular theoretical accounts which have laid claim to the character of the contemporary future horizon, due to their macro-focus, these accounts do not allow for consideration of the relationship between perceptions of the future and individuals or subjectivities. As such, this chapter considers how subjectivities can be theorised in the context of the study that informs this book. After considering a number of competing theoretical accounts, the work of Margaret Archer is chosen for the purposes of this work. Drawing on Archer’s modes of reflexivity, this chapter considers how—and indeed if—outlooks upon the future may be related to specific types of selves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity. Sociology, 40(3), 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. (1995). Fin de siècle social theory: Relativism, reduction, and the problem of reason. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice, (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action, (R. Johnson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2001). The phenomenological habitus and its construction. Theory and Society, 30(1), 80–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrugia, D. (2013). The reflexive subject: Towards a theory of reflexivity as practical intelligibility. Current Sociology, 61(3), 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978) The history of sexuality: An introduction, (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernisation: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 56–109). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, A. (1998). Narrative identity and auricular confession as biography-generators. In A. I. Baumgarten, J. Assmann, & G. G. Stroumsa (Eds.), Self, soul, and the body in religious experience (pp. 27–52). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2003). The second shift. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘practical’ critique of the habitus. Sociological Theory, 18(3), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: How we live on in future generations. New York: Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2013). Theory of society: Volume II, (R. Barrett, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and every-day life. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 26–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Cook .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cook, J. (2018). Strategies for Relating to the Personal and Societal Future. In: Imagined Futures. Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65325-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65325-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65324-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65325-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics