Abstract
While the previous chapter presented an overview of popular theoretical accounts which have laid claim to the character of the contemporary future horizon, due to their macro-focus, these accounts do not allow for consideration of the relationship between perceptions of the future and individuals or subjectivities. As such, this chapter considers how subjectivities can be theorised in the context of the study that informs this book. After considering a number of competing theoretical accounts, the work of Margaret Archer is chosen for the purposes of this work. Drawing on Archer’s modes of reflexivity, this chapter considers how—and indeed if—outlooks upon the future may be related to specific types of selves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity. Sociology, 40(3), 511–528.
Alexander, J. (1995). Fin de siècle social theory: Relativism, reduction, and the problem of reason. New York: Verso.
Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice, (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action, (R. Johnson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crossley, N. (2001). The phenomenological habitus and its construction. Theory and Society, 30(1), 80–120.
Farrugia, D. (2013). The reflexive subject: Towards a theory of reflexivity as practical intelligibility. Current Sociology, 61(3), 283–300.
Foucault, M. (1978) The history of sexuality: An introduction, (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernisation: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 56–109). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hahn, A. (1998). Narrative identity and auricular confession as biography-generators. In A. I. Baumgarten, J. Assmann, & G. G. Stroumsa (Eds.), Self, soul, and the body in religious experience (pp. 27–52). Leiden: Brill.
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2003). The second shift. London: Penguin Books.
Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
King, A. (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘practical’ critique of the habitus. Sociological Theory, 18(3), 417–433.
Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: How we live on in future generations. New York: Norton & Co.
Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Luhmann, N. (2013). Theory of society: Volume II, (R. Barrett, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and every-day life. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Wacquant, L. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 26–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cook, J. (2018). Strategies for Relating to the Personal and Societal Future. In: Imagined Futures. Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65325-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65325-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65324-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65325-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)