Abstract
Much of the existing causal inference literature focuses on the effect of a single or multiple time-point intervention on an outcome based on observing longitudinal data on n independent units that are not causally connected. The causal effect is then defined as an expectation of the effect of the intervention assigned to the unit on their outcome, and causal effects of the intervention on other units on the unit’s outcome are assumed nonexistent. As a consequence, causal models only have to be concerned with causal relations between the components of the unit-specific data structure. Statistical inference is based on the assumption that the n data structures are n independent realizations of a random variable. However, in many CRTs or observational studies of few communities, the number of independent units is not large enough to allow statistical inference based on limit distributions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See references in Sect. 20.9 for implications of incorrectly ignoring interference.
References
P.M. Aronow, C. Samii, Estimating average causal effects under interference between units. ArXiv e-prints, May (2013)
P.J. Bickel, C.A.J. Klaassen, Y. Ritov, J. Wellner, Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1997b)
M.J. Campbell, A. Donner, N. Klar, Developments in cluster randomized trials and statistics in medicine. Stat. Med. 26, 2–19 (2007)
A. Chambaz, M.J. van der Laan, Targeting the optimal design in randomized clinical trials with binary outcomes and no covariate: theoretical study. Int. J. Biostat. 7(1), Article 10 (2011a)
A. Chambaz, M.J. van der Laan, Targeting the optimal design in randomized clinical trials with binary outcomes and no covariate: simulation study. Int. J. Biostat. 7(1), Article 11 (2011b)
N.A. Christakis, J.H. Fowler, The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357(4), 370–379 (2007)
N.A. Christakis, J.H. Fowler, Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Stat. Med. 32(4), 556–577 (2013)
V. Didelez, A.P. Dawid, S. Geneletti, Direct and indirect effects of sequential treatments, in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2006), pp. 138–146
A. Donner, N. Klar, Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research (Arnold, London, 2000)
R.D. Gill, J.M. Robins, Causal inference in complex longitudinal studies: continuous case. Ann. Stat. 29(6), 1785–1811 (2001)
M.E. Halloran, C.J. Struchiner, Causal inference in infectious diseases. Epidemiology 6(2), 142–151 (1995)
R.J. Hayes, L.H. Moulton, Cluster Randomised Trials. (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2009)
F. Hu, W.F. Rosenberger, The Theory of Response Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials (Wiley, New York, 2006)
M.G. Hudgens, M.E. Halloran, Toward causal inference with interference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103(482), 832–842 (2008)
R. Lyons, The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Stat. Politics Policy 2(1) 1–26 (2010)
E.L. Ogburn, O. Sofrygin, M.J. van der Laan, I. Diaz, Causal inference for social network data with contagion. ArXiv e-prints, October (2017)
J. Pearl, Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, New York, 2009a)
D.B. Rubin, Matched Sampling for Causal Effects (Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, 2006)
C.R. Shalizi, A.C. Thomas, Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(2), 211–239 (2011)
M. Sobel, What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate? J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101(476), 1398–1407 (2006)
E.J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, T.J. VanderWeele. On causal inference in the presence of interference. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 21(1), 55–75 (2012)
A.A. Tsiatis, Semiparametric Theory and Missing Data. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2006)
M.J. van der Laan, Estimation based on case-control designs with known prevalence probability. Int. J. Biostat. 4(1), Article 17 (2008a)
M.J. van der Laan, Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I. Int. J. Biostat. 6(2), Article 2 (2010a)
M.J. van der Laan, Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part II. Int. J. Biostat. 6(2), Article 3 (2010b)
M.J. van der Laan, Causal inference for networks. Technical Report, Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley (2012)
M.J. van der Laan, Causal inference for a population of causally connected units. J. Causal Inference 2(1), 13–74 (2014a)
M.J. van der Laan, J.M. Robins, Unified Methods for Censored Longitudinal Data and Causality (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2003)
M.J. van der Laan, S. Rose, Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2011)
M.J. van der Laan, D.B. Rubin, Targeted maximum likelihood learning. Int. J. Biostat. 2(1), Article 11 (2006)
M.J. van der Laan, L.B. Balzer, M.L. Petersen, Adaptive matching in randomized trials and observational studies. J. Stat. Res. 46(2), 113–156 (2013a)
A.W. van der Vaart, Asymptotic Statistics (Cambridge, New York, 1998)
A.W. van der Vaart, J.A. Wellner, Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1996)
T.J. VanderWeele, W. An, Social networks and causal inference, in Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research (Springer, Berlin, 2013), pp. 353–374
T.J. VanderWeele, J.P. Vandenbrouke, E.J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, J.M. Robins, A mapping between interactions and interference: implications for vaccine trials. Epidemiology 23(3), 285–292 (2012b)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sofrygin, O., van der Laan, M.J. (2018). Causal Inference in Longitudinal Network-Dependent Data. In: Targeted Learning in Data Science. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65304-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65304-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65303-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65304-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)