Abstract
The Master’s candidate was invited to a meeting of the Research Ethics Committee (REC) to discuss the changes being required by the members who reviewed her proposal. The Master’s candidate displayed obvious annoyance and anger on her facial expression. Shortly after the meeting started, she stated:
References
Alahmad, G., M. Al-Jumah, and K. Dierickx. 2012. Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries. BMC Medical Ethics 13: 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-34.
Block, K., E. Riggs, and N. Haslam. 2013. Values and vulnerabilities: The ethics of research with refugees and asylum seekers. Australia: Australian Academic Press.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), World Health Organization (WHO). 2016. International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans vol. Retrieved from: http://www.cioms.ch/index.php/12-newsflash/400-cioms-inernational-ethical-guidelines.
Grady, C. 2009. Vulnerability in research: individuals with limited financial and/or social resources. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00347.x.
Human Development Report 2014. Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2014.
Hurst, S.A. 2008. Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 22 (4): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00631.x.
International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). 1996. Good clinical practice: Available at: http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/article/efficacy-guidelines.html.
Leaning, J. 2001. Ethics of research in refugee populations. Lancet 357 (9266): 1432–1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04572-4.
Levine, C., R. Faden, C. Grady, D. Hammerschmidt, L. Eckenwiler, J. Sugarman, and Consortium to Examine Clinical Research, E. 2004. The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160490497083.
Lott, J.P. 2005. Module three: Vulnerable/special participant populations. Developing World Bioethics 5: 30–54. Available at: http://www.udo-schuklenk.org/files/module33.pdf.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont report. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2016. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49c3646c2.html.
Schroeder, D., and E. Gefenas. 2009. Vulnerability: Too vague and too broad? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (2): 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180109090203.
Schuman, J. 2012. Beyond Nuremberg: A critique of informed consent in third world human subject research. Journal of Law and Health 25: 123–153.
Silverman, H. 2011. Protecting vulnerable research subjects in critical care trials: Enhancing the informed consent process and recommendations for safeguards. Annals of Intensive Care 1 (1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ali, N.M. (2017). Research Involving Persons Likely to be Vulnerable. In: Silverman, H. (eds) Research Ethics in the Arab Region. Research Ethics Forum, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65266-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65266-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65264-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65266-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)