Skip to main content

Challenges of Research Ethics Committees in the Arab Region

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Research Ethics in the Arab Region

Part of the book series: Research Ethics Forum ((REFF,volume 5))

  • 875 Accesses

Abstract

In the last decade health research, including international clinical trials, has increased greatly in the Arab region. However, commentators have voiced concerns that many RECs in this region might not be able to promote high standards of human subject protection due to several challenges that they face. These challenges include the lack of an enabling legal framework at the national level, inadequate institutional support that includes appropriate human and capital resources, insufficient training of members to review studies, inadequate membership diversity, lack of transparency and accountability mechanisms, absence of internal quality improvement programs, and 1lack of assessment mechanisms. We offer several solutions to address these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel-Aal, W., E.A. Ghaffar, and O. El Shabrawy. 2013. Review of the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC), National Research Center of Egypt, 2003–2011. Current Medical Research and Opinion 29 (10): 1411–1417. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2013.815158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP). 2015. Available at: http://www.aahrpp.org

  • Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), and World Health Organization (WHO). 2016. International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Geneva: CIOMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egyptian Network of Research Ethics Committees (ENREC). 2015. Available at: www.enrec.org.

  • Hyder, A.A., S.A. Wali, A.N. Khan, N.B. Teoh, N.E. Kass, and L. Dawson. 2004. Ethical review of health research: A perspective from developing country researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics 38: 68–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, N., L. Dawson, and N.I. Loyo-Berrios. 2003. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matar, A., and H. Silverman. 2013. Perspectives of Egyptian research ethics committees regarding their effective functioning. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 8 (1): 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milford, C., D. Wassenaar, and C. Slack. 2006. Resources and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: Preparations for HIV vaccine trials. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 28: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodley, K., and L. Myer. 2007. Health research ethics committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy. BMC Medical Ethics 8: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-8-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP). 2015. IRBs and assurances. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances/index.html.

  • Silaigwana, B., and D. Wassenaar. 2015. Biomedical research ethics committees in sub-Saharan Africa: A collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10 (2): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615575511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, H., H. Sleem, K. Moodley, N. Kumar, S. Naidoo, T. Subramanian,. .. M. Moni 2015. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 41(4): 332–337. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleem, H., S. El-Kamary, and H.J. Silverman. 2010a. Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt. BMC Medical Ethics 11: 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleem, H., R.A. Abdelhai, I. Al-Abdallat, M. Al-Naif, H.M. Gabr, E. T. Kehil, . .. H. Silverman. 2010b. Development of an accessible self-assessment tool for research ethics committees in developing countries. Journal of Empirical Research Human Reseach Ethics 5(3): 85–96; quiz 97–88. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER). 2015. SIDCER recognition programme: Available at: http://www.who.int/sidcer/en/

  • World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/

  • Younis, I.M. 2015. Overview of research committees status in Egypt: Challenges aspirations and current situation. Accountability in Research 22 (4): 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.956869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hany M. Sleem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sleem, H.M., Silverman, H. (2017). Challenges of Research Ethics Committees in the Arab Region. In: Silverman, H. (eds) Research Ethics in the Arab Region. Research Ethics Forum, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65266-5_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics