Abstract
This chapter discusses an ongoing arts-based research project that maps relationships between race, socioeconomic status, and measures of school quality in order to visualize systemic educational inequities and interrogate art education’s role in perpetuating them. The project is informed by critical race theorizations of Whiteness as property and explores relationships between socioeconomic stratification, school segregation, and art education. Conceptualized as an activist intervention, the project used the public forum of a painting exhibition in a university art gallery to make connections with art education stakeholders, open up public dialogue, and instigate critical reflection. Through this writing, the project also entailed a critical self-study of the author’s investment in White property as evidenced in the project’s methods and conceptual framework and in her art education practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This exhibition was supported in part by a New Faculty Research Grant from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
- 2.
In this chapter I capitalize Black and White as proper nouns referring to groups of people. When quoting other authors’ work, particularly that of critical race scholars of color, I honor their choices regarding capitalization of racial terms, leaving their original language as is.
- 3.
This designation refers to Title I—Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged—of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965), which provides supplemental funding for schools with high concentrations of students living in poverty, along with fairly strict accountability measures designed to promote the academic achievement of every child.
References
Acuff, J. B., Hirack, B., & Nangah, M. (2012). Dismantling a master narrative: Using culturally responsive pedagogy to teach the history of art education. Art Education, 65(5), 6–11.
Bell, D. A. (2000a). After we’re gone: Prudent speculations on America in a post-racial epoch. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (2nd ed., pp. 2–8). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bell, D. A. (2000b). Property rights in whiteness: Their legal legacy, their economic costs. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (2nd ed., pp. 71–79). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bequette, J. W. (2009). Tapping a postcolonial community’s cultural capital: Empowering native artists to engage more fully with traditional culture and their children’s art education. Visual Arts Research, 35, 76–90.
Campana, A. (2011). Agents of possibility: Examining the intersections of art, education, and activism in communities. Studies in Art Education, 52, 278–291.
Clotfelter, C. T., Lad, H. F., Vigdor, J. L., & Diaz, R. A. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low performing schools to attract and retain high quality teachers? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 251–271.
Cosier, K., & Nemeth, J. (2010). Art teachers as change makers. In T. Anderson, D. Gussak, K. Kelly Hallmark, & A. Paul (Eds.), Art education for social justice (pp. 165–171). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Daniel, P. T. K. (2004). Accountability and desegregation: Brown and its legacy. The Journal of Negro Education, 73(3), 255–267.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davis, D. E. (2009). Preparing white student teachers through a critical consultative interaction model. International Journal of Progressive Education, 5(2), 1–23.
Desai, D. (2010a). The challenge of the new colorblind racism in art education. Art Education, 63(5), 22–29.
Desai, D. (2010b). Reflections on social justice art teacher education. In T. Anderson, D. Gussak, K. Kelly Hallmark, & A. Paul (Eds.), Art education for social justice (pp. 172–178). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Dougherty, J., Harrelson, J., Maloney, L., Murphy, D., Smith, R., Snow, M., & Zannoni, D. (2009). School choice in suburbia: Test scores, race, and housing markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 523–548.
Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York: Peter Lang.
Galbraith, L., & Grauer, K. (2004). State of the field: Demographics and art teacher education. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 415–437). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gotanda, N. (2000). A critique of “our constitution is colorblind”. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (2nd ed., pp. 35–38). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Harris, C. I. (1995). Whiteness as property. In I. K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory: They key writings that formed the movement (pp. 276–291). New York: The New Press.
Knight, W. B. (2006a). E(raced) bodies in and out of sight/cite/site. The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 26, 323–345.
Knight, W. B. (2006b). Using contemporary art to challenge cultural values, beliefs, and assumptions. Art Education, 59(4), 39–45.
Knight, W. B. (2013). Moving beyond preparing just art teachers to preparing JUST art teachers: Teacher education for equity and social justice. In K. Tavin & C. Ballengee Morris (Eds.), Stand(ing) up, for a change (pp. 28–36). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Crown Publishers.
Kraehe, A. M., & Acuff, J. B. (2013). Theoretical considerations for art education research with and about “underserved populations”. Studies in Art Education, 54(4), 294–309.
Kraehe, A. M., Acuff, J. B., & Travis, S. (2016). Equity, the arts, and urban education: A review. Urban Review, 48, 220–244.
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.
Li, Y. (2012). From translation to the transnational: Reading art for the 21st-century classroom. Studies in Art Education, 53, 194–207.
National Education Association. (2003). Personal life. In The status of the American public school teacher (pp. 87–97). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities. (2011, May). Reinvesting in arts education: Winning America’s future through creative schools. Washington, DC: Author.
Purves, T., & Selzer, S. A. (2014). What we want is free: Critical exchanges in recent art. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Rolling, J. H., Jr. (2013). Arts-based research primer. New York: Peter Lang.
Spillane, S. (2015). The failure of whiteness in art education: A personal narrative informed by critical race theory. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 35, 57–68.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Access to arts education: Inclusion of additional questions in education’s planned research would help explain why instruction time has decreased for some students. (GAO Publication No. GAO-09-286). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09286.pdf
Whiteford, L., & Strom, E. (2013). Building community engagement and public scholarship into the university. Annals of Anthropological Practice, 37(1), 72–89.
Whitehead, J. (2012). Counternarratives: Considering urban students’ voices in art education. In K. Hutzel, F. M. C. Bastos, & K. Cosier (Eds.), Transforming city schools through art: Approaches to meaningful K-12 learning (pp. 34–42). New York: Teachers College Press.
Zamudio, M. M., Russell, C., Rios, F. A., & Bridgeman, J. L. (2011). Critical race theory matters: Education and ideology. New York: Routledge.
Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2008). Who is teaching? Does it matter? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 404–423). New York/Manassas, VA: Routledge/Co-published by the Association of Teacher Educators.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spillane, S. (2018). What’s Wrong with this Picture? Interrogating Landscapes of Inequity in Art Education. In: Kraehe, A., Gaztambide-Fernández, R., Carpenter II, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Race and the Arts in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65256-6_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65256-6_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65255-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65256-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)