Skip to main content

Solving the Issue by Distinguishing Types of Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice
  • 170 Accesses

Abstract

A first answer to the issues noted in Chap. 6 can be found in an approach that is common in the Public Administration and Policy Analysis literature. It maintains that the type of problem must be guiding for addressing the value choices. On closer inspection, this approach proves to be problematic. At issue are the objective definition of problems and the justification of guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bijker, W., Bal, R., & Hendriks, R. (2009). The paradox of scientific authority. The role of scientific advice in democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. B. (2008). Review of R.A. Pielke; The honest broker. Minerva, 46, 485–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2005). For Public Sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. & A. Wildavsky. (1983). Risk and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. N. (1988). Methods of the second type: Coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis. Policy Studies Review, 7, 720–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezrahi, Y. (1980). Utopian and pragmatic rationalism: The political context of scientific advice. Minerva, 18, 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. (1981). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. (2010). The governance of problems. Puzzling, powering and participation. Portland: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2008). Speaking honestly to power. Review of: The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics, by R.A. Pielke. American Scientist, 96(3), 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (1998). Das ‘Webersche Moment’: zur Kontingenz des Politischen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R. (2007). The honest broker. Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Root, M. (2007). Social problems. In H. Kincaid, J. Dupré, & A. Wylie (Eds.), Value-free science? Ideals and illusions (pp. 42–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tholen, B. (2016). The value of the issue context approach for scientific policy advice. Science and Public Policy, 43(2), 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1987). Analysis as Art. In: A. Wildavsky (Ed.), Speaking Truth to Power. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berry Tholen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tholen, B. (2018). Solving the Issue by Distinguishing Types of Problems. In: Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65253-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics