Skip to main content

Deciding on Tools and Risks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice
  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

The choices that must be made in the second phase of a scientific study also inevitably involve social values. First, there are the values that urge the scientist to respect the subjects he researches (e.g., animals, environment, or human beings). Second, choices must be made between measuring instruments that are epistemologically equivalent but might have different social consequences. Third, choices must be made about the level of risk of being wrong that is acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. E. (2007). Rejecting the Ideal of Value-free Science. In H. Kincaid, J. Dupré, & A. Wylie (Eds.), Value-Free Science? (pp. 120–141). Ideals and Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. E. (2009) Science, Policy, and the Value-free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, C. (2004). True Enough. Philosophical. Issues, 14, 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2015). Serviceable Truths: Science for Action in Law and Policy. Texas Law Review, 93, 1723–1749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (2002). Science: Conjectures and Refutations. In: idem, Conjectures and Refutations (pp. 43–78).London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudner. (1953). The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20,1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berry Tholen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tholen, B. (2018). Deciding on Tools and Risks. In: Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65253-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics