Skip to main content

Deciding What Is Worth Knowing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice
  • 169 Accesses

Abstract

In the first phase of a scientific study, a set of choices must be made for which scientific advisors cannot completely rely on epistemological values: doing scientific research, choice of research topic, research question and theories. The choices that are made in this phase of a study have implications for the advice that can be given. They determine about what issues inconvenient truths might be provided. Theory choices also lead to a particular value slope or appreciative system built-in in the conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dunn, W. N. (2012). Public Policy Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Th. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1973). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Lakatos, I. & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91–138). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press (Cambridge, Ma.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1993). The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol 2. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (2002). Science: Conjectures and Refutations. In idem, Conjectures and Refutations (pp. 43–78). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1954). Gespräch über die Macht und Zugang zum Machthaber. Pfullingen: Neske.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (2011). Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Ch. (1985). Neutrality in Political Science. In: Ch. Taylor (Ed.), Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers 2. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1995). The Art of Judgment. Sage (Thousand Oaks CA): A Study of Policy Making.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1948a). Science as a Vocation. In: H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.) From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology (pp. 129–156). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berry Tholen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tholen, B. (2018). Deciding What Is Worth Knowing. In: Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65253-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics