Skip to main content

Radiofrequency Ablation for Lower Extremity Venous Reflux

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1955 Accesses

Abstract

Lower extremity chronic venous disease is a significant public health problem and can have considerable negative effects on functional status in its advanced stages. Invasive interventions are indicated when the disease is symptomatic and refractory to compression therapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is much less invasive than surgical vein stripping with an excellent long-term success rate and acceptable recurrence rates compared to surgery. Postoperative pain and discomfort after RFA is much less than surgery, and patients have faster recovery with a higher quality of life during the perioperative period. Attention to proper technique, knowledge of venous anatomy and pathophysiology, and an understanding of ultrasound imaging while performing RFA will assure the best possible clinical results and diminish potential complications. RFA has been demonstrated to have less pain and bruising compared with laser ablation methods. It is now a well-established clinical treatment for superficial venous reflux and will be used as a standard of comparison for future technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Abbreviations

CVI:

Chronic venous insufficiency

DVT:

Deep venous thrombosis

EHIT:

Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis

EVLA:

Endovenous laser ablation

GSV:

Great saphenous vein

PAD:

Peripheral arterial disease

PE:

Pulmonary embolus

RFA:

Radiofrequency ablation

References

  1. Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15(3):175–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, et al. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the society for vascular surgery and the American venous forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(5 Suppl):2s–48s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simka M, Majewski E. The social and economic burden of venous leg ulcers: focus on the role of micronized purified flavonoid fraction adjuvant therapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(8):573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong K, Georgiades C. Radiofrequency ablation: mechanism of action and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8 Suppl):S179–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tatli S, Tapan U, Morrison PR, Silverman SG. Radiofrequency ablation: technique and clinical applications. Diag Interv Radiol (Ankara, Turkey). 2012;18(5):508–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Donnell TF Jr, Passman MA, Marston WA, Ennis WJ, et al. Management of venous leg ulcers: clinical practice guidelines of the society for vascular surgery and the American venous forum. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2 Suppl):3s–59s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merchant RF, Pichot O. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(3):502–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Merchant RF, Pichot O, Myers KA. Four-year follow-up on endovascular radiofrequency obliteration of great saphenous reflux. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(2):129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Enzler MA, Russell D, Schimmelpfennig J. Thermal ablation in the management of superficial thrombophlebitis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(6):726–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharifi M, Mehdipour M, Bay C, Emrani F, et al. Effect of anticoagulation on endothermal ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1):147–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Welch HJ. Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(3):601–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. American Venous Forum. Consent for superficial vein catheter ablation. http://www.veinforum.org/uploadDocs/1/Med-practice-Consent-AVF_-Vein_closure_10-20-2011.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2016.

  13. Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, et al. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):344–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e227S–77S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh R, Mesh CL, Aryaie A, Dwivedi AK, et al. Benefit of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic on surgical site infection in varicose vein surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26(5):612–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Joint Commission on National Quality Core Measures. Specifications manual for joint commission national quality core measures. 2010b. https://manual.jointcommission.org/releases/archive/TJC2010B/index.html. Accessed October 9, 2016.

  17. Intersocietal Accreditation Commission. IAC standards for vein center accreditation: superficial venous evaluation and management. http://www.intersocietal.org/vein/standards/IACVeinStandardsAug2015.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2016.

  18. Sadek M, Kabnick LS, Rockman CB, Berland TL, et al. Increasing ablation distance peripheral to the saphenofemoral junction may result in a diminished rate of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis. 2013;1(3):257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goode SD, Chowdhury A, Crockett M, Beech A, et al. Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(2):246–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS study). J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(2):207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Brar R, Moxey P, et al. A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):876–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Balint R, Farics A, Parti K, Vizsy L, et al. Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review. Vascular. 2016;24(6):649–57. pii: 1708538116648035. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Donnell TF, Balk EM, Dermody M, Tangney E, et al. Recurrence of varicose veins after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein in randomized trials. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis. 2016;4(1):97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rasmussen L, Lawaetz M, Serup J, Bjoern L, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins with 3-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis. 2013;1(4):349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Helmy ElKaffas K, ElKashef O, ElBaz W. Great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation versus standard stripping in the management of primary varicose veins-a randomized clinical trial. Angiology. 2011;62(1):49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Subramonia S, Lees T. Radiofrequency ablation vs conventional surgery for varicose veins - a comparison of treatment costs in a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(1):104–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dermody M, O'Donnell TF, Balk EM. Complications of endovenous ablation in randomized controlled trials. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis. 2013;1(4):427–436.e421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harlander-Locke M, Jimenez JC, Lawrence PF, Derubertis BG, et al. Management of endovenous heat-induced thrombus using a classification system and treatment algorithm following segmental thermal ablation of the small saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(2):427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dermody M, Schul MW, O’Donnell TF. Thromboembolic complications of endovenous thermal ablation and foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency. Phlebology. 2015;30(5):357–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marsh P, Price BA, Holdstock J, Harrison C, et al. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous thermoablation techniques: rates of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and classical DVT after radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation in a single centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(4):521–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haqqani OP, Vasiliu C, O'Donnell TF, Iafrati MD. Great saphenous vein patency and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous thermal ablation with modified catheter tip positioning. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(6 Suppl):10s–7s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sufian S, Arnez A, Lakhanpal S. Case of the disappearing heat-induced thrombus causing pulmonary embolism during ultrasound evaluation. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(2):529–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmad A, Sajjanshetty M, Mandal A, Hamilton H. Early arteriovenous fistula after radiofrequency ablation of long saphenous vein. Phlebology. 2013;28(8):438–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rudarakanchana N, Berland TL, Chasin C, Sadek M, et al. Arteriovenous fistula after endovenous ablation for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(5):1492–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziporin SJ, Ifune CK, MacConmara MP, Geraghty PJ, et al. A case of external iliac arteriovenous fistula and high-output cardiac failure after endovenous laser treatment of great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(3):715–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin EC, Todd GJ. Embolization of an arteriovenous fistula after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the saphenous vein. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(1):227–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shahid KR, Dellon AL, Amrami KK, Spinner RJ. Sciatic and peroneal nerve injuries after endovascular ablation of lower extremity varicosities: case reports and review of the literature. Annal Plastic Surg. 2015;74(1):64–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Harlander-Locke M, Lawrence PF, Alktaifi A, Jimenez JC, et al. The impact of ablation of incompetent superficial and perforator veins on ulcer healing rates. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(2):458–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Perala J, Ohtonen P, et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):958–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, et al. Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(1):67–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Perala J, Rautio T, Biancari F, Ohtonen P, et al. Radiofrequency endovenous obliteration versus stripping of the long saphenous vein in the management of primary varicose veins: 3-year outcome of a randomized study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19(5):669–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Subramonia S, Lees T. Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation or conventional high ligation and stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2010;97(3):328–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Almeida JI, Kaufman J, Gockeritz O, Chopra P, et al. Radiofrequency endovenous ClosureFAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY study). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(6):752–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gale SS, Lee JN, Walsh ME, Wojnarowski DL, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of endovenous thermal ablation using the 810-nm wavelength laser and the ClosurePLUS radiofrequency ablation methods for superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):645–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shepherd AC, Gohel MS, Brown LC, Metcalfe MJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2010;97(6):810–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rasmussen LH, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, Vennits B, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1079–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dzieciuchowicz L, Krasinski Z, Kruszyna L, Espinosa G. Assessment of the level of difficulty of four techniques of endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein and the echogenicity of the tip of the working device in vivo. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013;27(3):322–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dzieciuchowicz L, Espinosa G, Paramo JA. Haemostatic activation and inflammatory response after three methods of treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology. 2014;29(3):154–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mese B, Bozoglan O, Eroglu E, Erdem K, et al. A comparison of 1,470-nm endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of great saphenous veins 10 mm or more in size. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(7):1368–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, Goldman M, et al. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis. 2015;61(4):985–94.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Boersma D, van Eekeren RR, Kelder HJ, Werson DA, et al. Mechanochemical endovenous ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein insufficiency (MESSI trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. van Eekeren RR, Boersma D, Holewijn S, Vahl A, et al. Mechanochemical endovenous ablation versus RADiOfrequeNcy ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Aziz F, Diaz J, Blebea J, Lurie F. Practice patterns of endovenous ablation therapy for the treatment of venous reflux disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis. 2017;5(1):75–81.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Blebea MD, MBA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blebea, J., Khorgami, Z. (2018). Radiofrequency Ablation for Lower Extremity Venous Reflux. In: Chaar, C. (eds) Current Management of Venous Diseases . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65226-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65226-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65225-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65226-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics