Skip to main content

Abstract

Grounded theory is a strategy for conducting qualitative research without having a priori formulated hypotheses, but instead the method requires that researchers continuously compare and contrast pieces of collected empirical material to develop codes and categories that will serve in formulating a theory about the studied phenomenon. This chapter explains the logic of the grounded theory research strategy. The first part of the chapter presents the conceptual roots of the grounded theory approach and differences between deductive and inductive reasoning in theory development. The second part provides a broad description of the consecutive steps in the research process: data gathering, note-making, coding and theory development. Various coding strategies are explained and illustrated with examples. The chapter ends with enumeration of common misunderstandings associated with the grounded theory approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Blumer, the word “object” has a broad meaning: it encompasses physical artifacts, abstract concepts and institutions.

  2. 2.

    Both interviews and observations have been extensively discussed in another chapter of this textbook.

  3. 3.

    For a discussion on the pros and cons of the two approaches to literature review, see McGhee et al. (2007).

References

  • Ashworth, P. (1996). Presuppose Nothing! The Suspension of Assumptions in Phenomenological Psychological Methodology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 27(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (1983). The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing: And Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1988). To Coin a Phrase: The Study of Power and Democracy in Sweden. Stockholm: Regeringskansliets offsetcentral.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1992). Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park/London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1970/2006). Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendt, J., & Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded Theory Method in Management Research: Users’ Perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 430–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. T. (2009). Bracketing in Qualitative Research: Conceptual and Practical Matters. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4/5), 583–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances In the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs Forcing. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hensel, P. (2018). Organizational Responses to Proto-Institutions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, C. A. (2009). Theoretical Coding in Grounded Theory Methodology. The Grounded Theory Review, 8(3), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, J. A. (2010). The Coding Process and Its Challenges. The Grounded Theory Review, 9(1), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konecki, K. (2008). Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Rodziny kodowania wykorzystywane w analizie wizualnej. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 3, 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded Theory and Organizational Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded Theory Research: Literature Reviewing and Reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. (2006). From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2010). Grounded Theory in Practice: Issues and Discussion for New Qualitative Researchers. Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. A. (1981). Some Practical Aspects of Qualitative Data Analysis: One Way of Organizing the Cognitive Processes Associated with the Generation of Grounded Theory. Quality and Quantity, 15, 225–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., & Glaser, B. (2015). What Grounded Theory Is … A Critically Reflective Conversation Among Scholars. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 581–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1985). Sources of Order in Underoganized Systems: Themes in Recent Organizational Theory. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Organizational Theory and Inquiry. The Paradigm Revolution (pp. 106–136). Sage: Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hensel, P., Glinka, B. (2018). Grounded Theory. In: Ciesielska, M., Jemielniak, D. (eds) Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65217-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics