Abstract
This chapter provides an introduction to the qualitative methods and their use in the organization studies. It also provides an overview of the book and particular chapters within it.
Dariusz Jemielniak’s work on the publication was possible thanks to a research grant from the Polish National Science Center (no. UMO-2012/05/E/HS4/01498).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing Work Back In. Organization Science, 12(1), 76–95.
Bowden, A., & Ciesielska, M. (2016). Accretion, Angst and Antidote: The Transition from Knowledge Worker to Manager in the UK Heritage Sector in an Era of Austerity. In The Laws of the Knowledge Workplace: Changing Roles and the Meaning of Work in Knowledge-Intensive Environments. London: Routledge.
Ciesielska, M. (2008). From Rags to Riches – A Fairy Tale Or A Living Ethos? Stories of Polish Entrepreneurship During and After the Transformation of 1989. In M. Kostera (Ed.), Organizational Olympians: Heroes and Heroines of Organizational Myths (pp. 59–70). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Ciesielska, M., & Petersen, G. (2013). Boundary Object As a Trust Buffer. The Study Of an Open Source Code Repository. Tamara Journal of Critical Organisation Inquiry, 11(3), 5.
Czarniawska, B. (2001). Having Hope in Paralogy. Human Relations, 54(1), 13–21.
Czarniawska, B. (2017). Organization Studies As Symmetrical Ethnology. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 6(1), 2–10.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1999). Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.
Gaggiotti, H., Kostera, M., & Krzyworzeka, P. (2016). More than a Method? Organisational Ethnography as a Way of Imagining the Social. Culture and Organization, 23(5), 325–340.
Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jemielniak, D. (2002). Kultura – odkrywana czy konstruowana? Master of Business Administration, 2(55), 28–30.
Jemielniak, D. (2005). Kultura – zawody i profesje. Prace i Materialy Instytutu Studiów Miedzynarodowych SGH, 32, 7–22.
Jemielniak, D. (2013). Netnografia, czyli etnografia wirtualna – nowa forma badań etnograficznych. Prakseologia, 154, 97–116.
Jemielniak, D. (2015). Naturally Emerging Regulation and the Danger of Delegitimizing Conventional Leadership: Drawing on the Example of Wikipedia. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jemielniak, D., & Aibar, E. (2016). Bridging the Gap Between Wikipedia and Academia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1773–1776.
Jemielniak, D., & Greenwood, D. J. (2015). Wake Up or Perish: Neo-Liberalism, the Social Sciences, and Salvaging the Public University. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 15(1), 72–82.
Jemielniak, D., & Kostera, M. (2010). Narratives of Irony and Failure in Ethnographic Work. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 27(4), 335–347.
Konecki, K. (1990). Dependency and Worker Flirting. In B. A. Turner (Ed.), Organizational Symbolism (pp. 55–66). Berlin/New York: Gruyter.
Konecki, K. (2008a). Grounded Theory and Serendipity. Natural History of a Research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 4(1), 171–188.
Konecki, K. (2008b). Triangulation and Dealing with the Realness of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 4(3), 7–28.
Latour, B. (1986). The Powers of Association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief – A New Sociology of Knowledge? London/Boston/Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Latusek-Jurczak, D., & Prystupa, K. (2014). Collaboration and Trust-Building in Open Innovation Community. Journal of Economics & Management, 17, 47.
Pfeffer, J. (1995). Mortality, Reproducibility, and the Persistence of Styles of Theory. Organization Science, 6(6), 681–686.
Przegalinska, A. (2015). Embodiment, Engagement and The Strength Virtual Communities: Avatars of Second Life in Decay. Tamara, 13, 48–62.
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflexive Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Strumińska-Kutra, M. (2016). Engaged Scholarship: Steering Between the Risks of Paternalism, Opportunism, and Paralysis. Organization, 23(6), 864–883.
Van Maanen, J. (1995). Fear and Loathing in Organization Studies. Organization Science, 6(6), 687–692.
Whyte, W. F., & Whyte, K. K. (1984). Learning from the Field: A Guide from Experience. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jemielniak, D., Ciesielska, M. (2018). Qualitative Research in Organization Studies. In: Ciesielska, M., Jemielniak, D. (eds) Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65217-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65217-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65216-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65217-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)