Skip to main content

Intellectual Capital and Gender Capital: The Case of Italian Universities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 965 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

This chapter aims to understand whether the organizations characterized by the culture of diversity and inclusion are organizations that promote the creation of value. Starting from the hypothesis that gender capital, considered as gender diversity within a business reality, facilitates the transfer of interpersonal skills and relationships with stakeholders and company culture, our analysis is aimed at assessing the impact of gender capital on intellectual capital of organizations and, in particular, on its components (human capital, relational capital, structural capital). The research proposes a quantitative method. In the first step of the analysis, for each university the number of women full professors, associate professors and researchers are identified as independent variables. In the second step, the intellectual capital components are identified by the quota premium that universities receive from the ministry for research and teaching activities as dependent variables. To assess the impact that gender capital has on intellectual capital, the independent variables are correlated with the dependent variables. This methodology allows us to understand if the culture of diversity is able to generate greater value within organizations, in particular, if women’s skills can make a real difference to foster the competitive advantage of an organization. Moreover, this study contributes expanding the literature on gender studies and it offers a new perspective applied to the concept of gender capital. The outcomes of the application are related to a better understanding the need to fill the cultural and social gap. The results allow asserting that to implement diversity within organizations and develop the principle of inclusion enables to create greater value in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, D., Sweeney, D., Williams, T., Camm, J., & Cochran, J. (2012). Quantitative methods for business. London: Cengage Learning EMEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, L., & Adamuti-Trache, M. (2007). You’ve come a long way, baby? Persistent gender inequality in university enrolment and completion in Canada, 1979–2004. Canadian Public Policy, 33(1), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M. G., Del Baldo, M., & Vignini, S. (2015). White flies in Italian accounting scholars: Some suggestions from the past. Paper presented at VIII Accounting History International Conference Accounting’s history in diverse industries and other settings, Ballarat, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M. G., Del Baldo, M., & Vignini, S. (2016). Disuguaglianza di genere nel contesto accademico e universitario in Italia: il contributo delle studiose di Economia Aziendale. In P. Paoloni (Ed.), I mondi delle donne. Percorsi interdisplinari (pp. 1–26). Roma: EDI Cusano, Collana Studi e Ricerche. isbn: 978-88–98948–05–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B. (2002). Challenging equal opportunities; changing and adapting male hegemony in academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, M. L. (2002). Effetti della riforma dei concorsi universitari su carriere accademiche e dinamiche di genere. Polis, 16(3), 417–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, T. S. (2009). Gender capital and male bodybuilders. Body & Society, 15(1), 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañibano, L., & Sánchez, M. P. (2009). Intangibles in universities: Current challenges for measuring and reporting. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorrego, P. F., Costa, R. V., & Fernández, C. F. J. (2013). Product innovation and relational capital: Evidence from Portugal. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J. (2016). A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: From reporting to disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(1), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facchini, C. (1997). Uomini e donne nell’università italiana. In R. Moscati (Ed.), Chi governa l’Università? (Vol. 1997, pp. 214–244). Napoli: Liguori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frattini, R., & Rossi, P. (2012). Report sulle donne nell’universitá italiane. Meno di zero III (8–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granelli, A., & Robotti, O. (2016). Introduzione. Il valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (pp. 7–14). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, P. (2016). La diversità è ricchezza. ll valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (p. 28). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groysberg, B., & Connolly, K. (2016). I grandi leader che hanno realizzato l’inclusione. ll valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (pp. 47–64). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, K. H., & Warden, C. (2004). Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organizations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 15(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, K. H., Curaj, A., Elena-Perez, S., Fazlagic, J., Kalemis, K., Martinaitis, Z., et al. (2014). A strategic approach for intellectual capital management in European universities. Guidelines for implementation. Bucharest: UEFISCDI Blueprint Series No. 1. Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A., Papa, A., Cuozzo, B., & Russo, G. (2016). Evaluating the innovation of the Internet of things: Empirical evidence from the Intellectual Capital assessment. Business Process Management Journal, 2(2), 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, J., Larsden, H.T., & Bukh, P.N.D. (2001). Intellectual capital and the capable firm: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7), 735–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (2015). Qualitative research in business & management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomba, R. (2003). Figlie di Minerva. Primo rapporto sulle carriere femminili negli Enti Pubblici di Ricerca italiani. Franco Angeli: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoloni, P. (2011). La dimensione relazionale delle imprese femminili. Franco Angeli: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoloni, P., & Dumay, J. (2015). The relational capital of micro-enterprises run by women: the start-up phase. Vine, 45(2), 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehler, K. P. (2016). Per una cultura realmente inclusiva. Il valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (p. 29). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, E. (2008). Donne, uomini e potere. Disuguaglianze di genere in azienda, politica, accademica. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, M. P., Elena, S., & Castrillo, R. (2009). Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, M. P., & Elena, S. (2006). Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(4), 529–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secundo, G., Dumay, J., Schiuma, G., & Passiante, G. (2016). Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 298–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance Improvement, 37(7), 56–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todericiu, R., & Şerban, A. (2015) Intellectual Capital and its Relationship with Universities. Paper presented at 22nd International Economic Conference–IECS 2015 “Economic Prospects in the Context of Growing Global and Regional Interdependencies”, IECS 2015 Procedia Economics and Finance 27, p. 713–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trequattrini, R., Shams, R., Lardo, A., & Lombardi, R. (2016). Risk of an epidemic impact when adopting the internet of things: The role of sector-based resistance. Business Process Management Journal, 22(2), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veltri, S., Mastroleo, G., & Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M. (2014). Measuring the intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, D. (2008). Quantitative methods for business. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper is the result of a group effort of analysis and reflection, Raffaele Trequattrini, authored Sects. 12.6 and 12.8; Fabio Nappo, Sects. 12.3 and 12.4; Alessandra Lardo, Sect. 12.1 and 12.5; and Benedetta Cuozzo, Sect. 12.2 and 12.7. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedstta Cuozzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trequattrini, R., Nappo, F., Lardo, A., Cuozzo, B. (2018). Intellectual Capital and Gender Capital: The Case of Italian Universities. In: Paoloni, P., Lombardi, R. (eds) Gender Issues in Business and Economics. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65193-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics