Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multilevel Cultural Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross Cultural Issues in Consumer Science and Consumer Psychology

Abstract

Multilevel structures are omnipresent. Consumers live in geographical locations, shop in specific stores, or are members of clubs. Consumers who belong to the same group share characteristics and are expected to be more similar than consumers belonging to another group. In data analysis, this sharedness needs to be taken into account to enable valid inferences. In this chapter, we describe what multilevel analysis is and introduce major methods when dealing with multiple levels of analysis (e.g., individual and country). We elaborate on the key issues in multilevel analysis being aggregation and isomorphism, and finalize with a discussion on the conventional top-down approach in which higher levels affect individuals and the recent bottom-up approach in which individuals via their attitudes and behaviors affect societal norms. Multilevel issues are expected to become more popular in the next years, also because of the available new tools for applied researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akdeniz, M. B., & Talay, M. B. (2013). Cultural variations in the use of marketing signals: A multilevel analysis of the motion picture industry. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 601–624. doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0338-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcikowski, R. S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(3), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. (1986). Factor comparison: An examination of three methods. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA [etc.]: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. Review of Research in Education, 8, 158–233. doi:10.2307/1167125

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Bliese, P. D., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, E., Dülmer, H., Schlüter, E., Schmidt, P., & Meuleman, B. (2012). Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 558–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkan Ozkaya, H., Dabas, C., Kolev, K., Hult, G. T. M., Dahlquist, S. H., & Manjeshwar, S. A. (2013). An assessment of hierarchical linear modeling in international business, management, and marketing. International Business Review, 22(4), 663–677. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., Ferreira, M. C., Assmar, E., Redford, P., Harb, C., Glazer, S., … Achoui, M. (2009). Individualism-collectivism as descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., Ferreira, M. C., Jiang, D.-Y., Cheng, B.-S., Achoui, M. M., Wong, C. C., … Achmadi, D. (2011). Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? An exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures. Social Justice Research, 24(4), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., Milfont, T. L., & Gouveia, V. V. (2011). Does social context affect value structures? Testing the within-country stability of value structures with a functional theory of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Whence differences in value priorities?: Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1127–1144. doi:10.1177/0022022110381429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., Vauclair, C. M., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Are individual-level and country-level value structures different? Testing Hofstede’s legacy with the Schwartz value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(2), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 345–365. doi:10.1177/0022022108318112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, O., Liu, S.-C., & Sudharshan, D. (2000). The relationships between culture and service quality perceptions: Basis for cross-cultural market segmentation and resource allocation. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel statistical models (Vol. 922). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Romá, V., & Hernández, A. (2017). Multilevel modeling: Research-based lessons for substantive researchers. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Merz, M. A., & Alden, D. L. (2008). Diffusion of measurement invariance assessment in cross-national empirical marketing research: Perspectives from the literature and a survey of researchers. Journal of International Marketing, 16(2), 64–83. doi:10.1509/jimk.16.2.64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyden, M. L. M., Fourné, S. P. L., Koene, B. A. S., Werkman, R., & Ansari, S. (2017). Rethinking ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ roles of top and middle managers in organizational change: Implications for employee support. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/joms.12258

  • Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., & Kuehnl, C. (2010). Social influence on salespeople’s adoption of sales technology: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 159–168. doi:10.1007/s11747-009-0157-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, E. D. T., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2016). Materialism across the life span: An age-period-cohort analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 451–473. doi:10.1037/pspp0000092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2017). A retrospective on culture’s consequences: The 35-year journey. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1), 12–29. doi:10.1057/s41267-016-0037-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K. (Eds.). (2000). Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (Frontiers of industrial and organizational psychology, 12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I. G. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies. Unpublished manuscript, California State University at Los Angeles, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London [etc.]: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, J. R., Fischer, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2017). Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(21), 5407–5412. doi:10.1073/pnas.1616572114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke, G. H., Dolan, C. V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2003a). On the relationship between sources of within-and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model. Intelligence, 31(6), 543–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke, G. H., Dolan, C. V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2003b). Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: An implication of strict factorial invariance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56(2), 231–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. D., & Hill, R. P. (2012). Life satisfaction, self-determination, and consumption adequacy at the bottom of the pyramid. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1155–1168. doi:10.1086/661528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. D., & Neale, M. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 259–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merino, M., & Vargas, D. (2013). How consumers perceive globalization: A multilevel approach. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 431–438. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F., Mithas, S., Keiningham, T., & Aksoy, L. (2011). An investigation of the cross-national determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C. (1993). Comparing correlations based on individual-level and aggregated data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following orthogonal Procrustes rotation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(1), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, R., & Van De Voorde, K. (2016). The application of the multilevel paradigm in human resource management–outcomes research. Journal of Management, 0149206316673720. doi:10.1177/0149206316673720

  • Pituch, K. A., & Stapleton, L. M. (2012). Distinguishing between cross-and cluster-level mediation processes in the cluster randomized trial. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 630–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 189–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modeling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, D. A. Van Hemert, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 93-119). New York etc.: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. (Reprinted from: IN FILE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B. (2011). Communication styles as dimensions of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., & Sparks, K. (2001). An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede values survey module 1994: A comparison of individual and country/province level results. Applied Psychology, 50(2), 269–281. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B., & De Jong, M. G. (2010). A global investigation into the constellation of consumer attitudes toward global and local products. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 18–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B., & Geyskens, I. (2006). How country characteristics affect the perceived value of web sites. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., ter Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (1991). The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strizhakova, Y., & Coulter, R. A. (2013). The “green” side of materialism in emerging BRIC and developed markets: The moderating role of global cultural identity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(1), 69–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405-439. doi:10.1037/a0018938. (Supplemental).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Steel, P., Kirkman, B. L., Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. (2011). Three decades of research on national culture in the workplace: Do the differences still make a difference? Organizational Dynamics, 40(3), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L., Woo, S. E., & Vermunt, J. K. (2014). A conceptual and methodological framework for psychometric isomorphism. Organizational Research Methods, 17(1), 77–106. doi:10.1177/1094428113517008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2001). Personality in cultural context: Methodological issues. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 1007–1031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1994). Methodological issues in cross-cultural studies on parental rearing behavior and psychopathology. In C. Perris, W. A. Arrindell, & M. Eisemann (Eds.), Parental rearing and psychopathology (pp. 173–197). Chicester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J., Van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2008). Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Herk, H., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2012). Current and historical antecedents of individual value differences across 195 regions in Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8), 1229–1248. doi:10.1177/0022022111429719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Shiu, E., & Hassan, L. M. (2014). Cross-national advertising and behavioral intentions: A multilevel analysis. Journal of International Marketing, 22(1), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M., ter Hofstede, F., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (1998). Mixture model analysis of complex samples. Journal of Classification, 15(2), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieseke, J., Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., Dawson, J. F., & Van Dick, R. (2008). Multilevel analysis in marketing research: Differentiating analytical outcomes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigman, J. T. W., van Os, J., Borsboom, D., Wardenaar, K. J., Epskamp, S., Klippel, A., … Wichers, M. (2015). Exploring the underlying structure of mental disorders: Cross-diagnostic differences and similarities from a network perspective using both a top-down and a bottom-up approach. Psychological Medicine, 45(11), 2375–2387. doi:10.1017/S0033291715000331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3–4), 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Economics, Department of Marketing, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hester van Herk

  2. School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand

    Ronald Fischer

Authors
  1. Hester van Herk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hester van Herk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Economics, Department of Marketing, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hester van Herk

  2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA

    Carlos J. Torelli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Herk, H., Fischer, R. (2017). Multilevel Cultural Issues. In: van Herk, H., Torelli, C. (eds) Cross Cultural Issues in Consumer Science and Consumer Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65091-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation