Abstract
This book is about elicitation, which may be defined as the facilitation of the quantitative expression of subjective judgement, whether about matters of fact or matters of value. To motivate, we review case studies from human health (swine flu); provision of public services (airport location); natural hazards (assessment of the risk of earthquakes) and environmental protection (in the case of radioactive waste) where elicitation was or could have been profitably used to inform decisions. It is often argued that uncertainties are too deep or human values are too profound for quantitative thinking to be applicable: we argue on the contrary (drawing again on cases) that it is impossible to think about important problems without dealing with problems of “how big” and “how much”. We provide an overview of chapters in the book, which, we argue, shows that there is a huge body of knowledge and expertise about how to elicit both probabilities and preferences in important social problems, and conclude with future trends that make the subject of this book (in our view) particularly timely.
I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely in your thoughts advanced to the state of Science, whatever the matter may be.
Lord Kelvin (1891, pp. 72–72)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Anteroinen J (2012) Integration of existing military capability models into the Comprehensive Capability Meta-model. Paper presented at the SysCon, Vancouver
Bea R (2010) Failures of the deepwater horizon semi-submersible drilling unit. Deepwater Horizon Study Group, University of California, Berkeley. https://ccrm.berkeley.edu/pdfs_papers/bea_pdfs/DeepWaterBobBeaPrelimAnalyses-rev5-2.pdf. Accessed 08 June 2017
Bond SD, Carlson KA, Keeney RL (2008) Generating objectives: can decision makers articulate what they want? Manag Sci 54(1):56–70
CoRWM (2006) Managing our radioactive waste safely. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/managing-our-radioactive-waste-safely-corwm-doc-700. Accessed 08 June 2017
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2015) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Harrell E (2009) How to deal with swine flu: heeding the mistakes of 1976. Time Magazine http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1894129,00.html. Accessed 12 June 2017
Financial Times (2016) Britain has had enough of experts, says Gove https://www.ft.com/content/3be49734-29cb-11e6-83e4-abc22d5d108c?mhq5j=e1. Accessed 8 June 2017
Geldermann J, Bertsch V, Treitz M, French S, Papamichail KN, Hamalainen RP (2009) Multi-criteria decision support and evaluation of strategies for nuclear remediation management. Omega Int J Manage S 37(1):238–251
Hall P (1980) Great planning disasters. University of California Press, Berkley
Junger S (1997) The perfect storm. Norton, New York
Keeney RL (1992) Value-focussed thinking: a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Kelvin L (1891) Popular lectures and addresses. MacMillan, London and New York
Martelli A and Mualchin L (2012) Indictment and conviction of members of the Italian “Commissione Grandi Rischi” (open letter to the President of Italy). www.cngeologi.it/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/CoverletterandStatementISSO1.pdf. Accessed 08 June 2017
Masys AJ (2012) Black swans to grey swans: revealing the uncertainty. Disaster Prev Manag 21(3):320–335
Mishan EJ (1970) What is wrong with Roskill. J Transp Econ Policy 4(3):221–234
Morton A, Airoldi M, Phillips LD (2009) Nuclear risk management on stage: a decision analysis perspective on the UK’s committee on radioactive waste management. Risk Anal 29:764–779
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (2010) Interim report on causes of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig blowout and ways to prevent such events. www.nap.edu/catalog/13047.html. Accessed 08 June 2017
Nature (2011) Scientists on trial: at fault? www.nature.com/news/2011/110914/full/477264a.html. Accessed 08 June 2017
Neustadt RE, Fineberg HV (1983) The epidemic that never was. Vintage, New York
Paté-Cornell E (2012) On “Black Swans” and “Perfect Storms”: risk analysis and management when statistics are not enough. Risk Anal 32(11):1823–1833
Pliskin JS, Shepard DS, Weinstein MC (1980) Utility functions for life years and health status. Oper Res 28(1):206–224
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2): 155–169
Roan S (2009) Swine flu debacle of 1976 is recalled. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/apr/27/science/sci-swine-history27?pg=1. Accessed 12 June 2017
Science (2012) Earthquake experts convicted of manslaughter. www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/10/earthquake-experts-convicted-manslaughter. Accessed 08 June 2017
Science (2014) Updated: appeals court overturns manslaughter convictions of six earthquake scientists www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/11/updated-appeals-court-overturns-manslaughter-convictions-six-earthquake-scientists. Accessed 08 June 2017
Self P (1970) “Nonsense on stilts”: cost-benefit analysis and the Roskill commission Polit Q 41(3): 249–260
Taleb NH (2007) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random house, New York
Tetlock PE (2003) Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cogn Sci 7(7):320–324
Tetlock PE, Kristel OV, Elson SB, Green MC, Lerner JS (2000) The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. J Pers Soc Psychol 78(5):853–870
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dias, L.C., Morton, A., Quigley, J. (2018). Elicitation: State of the Art and Science. In: Dias, L., Morton, A., Quigley, J. (eds) Elicitation. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65051-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65052-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)