Skip to main content

The Asian Criminological Paradigm and How It Links Global North and South: Combining an Extended Conceptual Tool box from the North with Innovative Asian Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South

Abstract

This chapter reviews the development of Asian criminology under the framework of the Asian Criminological Paradigm (Liu, Asian Journal of Criminology, 4(1), 1–9, 2009). I primarily review the conceptual and theoretical developments, to suggest strategies that can contribute to the task of bridging the gap between global North and South. Asian criminology has expanded the theoretical tool box originally developed in the global North through the strategies of transportation of theories, elaboration of theories, and proposing new concepts and theories based on the empirical grounds of Asian contexts.

This article was originally published as: Liu, J. (2017). The Asian Criminological Paradigm and how it links global North and South: Combining an extended conceptual tool box from the North with innovative Asian contexts. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 6(1): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i1.385.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Analects, the recorded words and deeds of Confucius and his disciples, includes Chap. 14, ‘Constitutional Question’, which is the original Constitution that was compiled by the disciples of Confucius.

  2. 2.

    Duke Ling of Wei was a ruler of the ancient Chinese state of Wei, the son of Duke Xiang of Wei. He was the subject of Chap. 15 of The Analects.

References

  • Aas, K. F. (2012). ‘The Earth is one by the world is not’: Criminological theory and its geopolitical divisions. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1362480611433433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundations for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2006). General strain theory: Current status and directions for future research. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory (pp. 101–123). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2014). The origin of strains: Why certain events and conditions are disliked. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 19–22 November, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelang, K., & Beck, S. (2010). Comparison in the wild and more disciplined usages of an epistemic practice. In T. Scheffer & J. Niewohner (Eds.), Thick Comparison: Reviving the Ethnographic Aspiration (pp. 155–180). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. L., & Bennett, R. R. (1996). Development, gender, and crime: The scope of the routine activities approach. Justice Quarterly, 13(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600092811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, W.-N., Haas, A., Chen, X., & Pi, Y. (2014). Repeated strains, social control, social learning, and delinquency: Testing an integrated model of general strain theory in China. Youth & Society, 46(3), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11436189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, W.-N., Haas, A., & Pi, Y. (2007). Life strain, coping, and delinquency in the People’s Republic of China: An empirical test of general strain theory from a matching perspective in social support. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06294428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. R. (1991). Routine activities: A Cross-national assessment of a criminological perspective. Social Forces, 70, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J. (2015). The expansion of Asian criminology and how it is advancing criminology research and crime control. Keynote speech at 7th Annual Conference of the Asian Criminological Society, 26–27 June. Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2015). Rethinking criminology through radical diversity in Asian reconciliation. Asian Criminology, 10(3), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9200-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K. (2015). Feminism and Global Justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C.-K., Ngai, N.-P., & Ngai, S. S.-Y. (2007). Family strain and adolescent delinquency in two Chinese cities, Guangzhou and Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(5), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9112-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, N. W. T. (2014). Low self-control and co-occurrence of gambling with substance use and delinquency among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9351-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, N. W. T., & Cheung, Y. W. (2008). Self-control, social factors, and delinquency: A test of the general theory of crime among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(4), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9218-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, N. W. T., & Cheung, Y. W. (2010). Strain, self-control, and gender differences in delinquency among Chinese adolescents: Extending general strain theory. Sociological Perspectives, 53(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.3.321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. W. (1997). Family, school, peer, and media predictors of adolescent deviant behavior in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(5), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024534022895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui, W. H., & Chan, H. C. O. (2013). The gendered analysis of self-control on theft and violent delinquency: An examination of Hong Kong adolescent population. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1648–1677. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112871247099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. (Ed.). (2012). Comparative Law and Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottee, S. (2014). We need to talk about Mohammad: Criminology, theistic violence and the murder of Theo van Gogh. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 981–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterrell, R. (2012). Comparative sociology of law. In D. Clark (Ed.), Comparative Law and Society (pp. 39–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cretacci, M. A., Rivera, C. J., & Ding, F. (2009). Self-control and Chinese deviance: A look behind the bamboo curtain. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 4(2), 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith, E. (2013). Laws and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C., Tang, C., & Ko, J. (2004). The impact of peer, family and school on delinquency: A study of at-risk Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 47(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872804046255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, C. (2012). Low Self-Control as a Source of Crime. Bonn, Germany: Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, A., & Fox, R. (Eds.). (2002). Anthropology by Comparison. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R. (2006). The empirical status of control theory in criminology. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory (pp. 77–100). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., Land, K. C., & Wang, J. (2013). Social ties, collective efficacy and perceived neighborhood property crime in Guangzhou, China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(3), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9167-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2012). The stability of self-control: A group-based approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-012-9128-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. T. (2002). The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., & Uchida, Y. (2005). Interdependent agency: An alternative system for action. In R. M. Sorrentino, C. Dov, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Culture and Social Behavior: The Ontario Symposium (10th ed., pp. 137–164). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J. L. (2001). The social ecology of violent victimization: Individual and contextual effects in the NCVS. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, G. (1990). Relativism and cross-cultural criminology: A critical analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(5), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427890027001002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2011). Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-H. (2012). General strain theory in Taiwan: A latent growth curve modeling approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2005) Predicting recidivism in a communitarian society: China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (SSCI) 49(4): 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X04272852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2007). Principles of restorative justice and Confucian philosophy in China. European Forum for Restorative Justice, 8(1), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2009). Asian Criminology—Challenges, opportunities and directions. Asian Journal of Criminology, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-009-9066-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2011a). Asian paradigm of criminology. Paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference of the Asian Criminological Society, 15–19 December, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2013). Asian paradigm and access to justice. Keynote speech at the Fifth Annual Conference of Asian Criminological Society, 14–16 April. Mumbai, India: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2014). Culture and criminal justice—A theory of relational justice. Keynote address at the 6th Annual Conference of Asian Criminological Society, 27–29 June, Osaka, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2015). The roots of restorative justice: Universal process or from the West to the East? Acta Crimologiae et Medicinae Legalis Japonica, 81(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2016). Asian paradigm and access to justice. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216656681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Hebenton, B., & Jou, S. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of Asian Criminology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Palermo, G. B. (2009). Restorative justice and Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice, 7(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. X. (2011b). Strain as a moderator of the relationship between parental attachment and delinquent participation: A China study. International Criminal Justice Review, 21(4), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H. K., Shek, D. T. L., Cheung, P. C., & Tam, K. K. (2002). A longitudinal study of peer and teacher influences on prosocial and antisocial behavior of Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.2.157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattei, U. (2006). Comparative law and critical legal studies. In M. Reimann & R. R. Zimmerman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (pp. 815–836). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. (2014). Inequality and rights: Commentary on Michael McCann’s ‘The unbearable lightness of rights’. Law and Society Review, 48(2), 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (2014). Social institutions, theory development, and the promise of comparative criminological research. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9175-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (2015). When West meets East: Generalizing theory and expanding the conceptual toolkit of criminology. Journal of Asian Criminology, 10(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9197-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., Zhou, L., Zhang, L., & Liu, J. (2007). Risks of criminal victimization in contemporary urban China: An application of lifestyle/routine activities theory. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 496–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701485429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelken, D. (2010). Comparative Criminal Justice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, N.-P., & Cheung, C.-K. (2005). Predictors of the likelihood of delinquency: A study of marginal youth in Hong Kong, China. Youth & Society, 36(4), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X04265090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00911.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Winfree, L. T., Jr., Madensen, T. D., Daigle, L. E., et al. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903379610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., & Zimmerman, R. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2015). Crime and the life course in a changing world: Insights from Chicago and implications for global criminology. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-015-9220-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, S. (2006). Beyond Self-Control: Analysis and Critique of Gottfredson & Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime (1990): Some Considerations on Theory Construction and Theoretical Integration in Positivist/Etiological Criminology. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humboldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. E. (2010). The utility of country structure: A cross-national multilevel analysis of property and violent victimization. International Criminal Justice Review, 20(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567710361718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, D., & Kawachi, I. (2014). Neighborhood social heterogeneity and crime victimization in Japan: Moderating effects of social networks. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9191-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kesteren, J., John, P. M., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2001). Criminal Victimization in Seventeen Industrialized Countries: Key Findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey. The Hague: WODC.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wilsem, J., de Graaf, N. D., & Karin, W. (2002). Variations in cross-national victimization. In N. Paul (Ed.), Crime Victimization in Comparative Perspective: Results from the International Crime Victims Survey, 1989–2000 (pp. 119–140). The Netherlands: Boom Juridische uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2015). Whither criminology: Its global future(s)? Keynote address at the 7th Annual Conference of the Asian Criminological Society, 26–27 June. Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. T., Hengrui, Q., Hong, S., & Zhang, J. (2002). Adolescent social bond, self-control and deviant behavior in China. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 39(1), 52–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics off Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. S. W. (2001). Pathways to delinquency in Hong Kong and Guangzhou (South China). International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 10(1/2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2001.9747893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2011). The Criminological Imagination. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, J. (2018). The Asian Criminological Paradigm and How It Links Global North and South: Combining an Extended Conceptual Tool box from the North with Innovative Asian Contexts. In: Carrington, K., Hogg, R., Scott, J., Sozzo, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65020-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65021-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics