Skip to main content

Connecting the Dots: The Politics of Governing Urban Climate Adaptation Innovations Through Transnational Municipal Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Climate Change in Cities

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

Since Agenda 21 was ratified at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, a number of transnational municipal networks (TMNs) have emerged to promote a variety of sustainability and climate change actions. Despite research on the role of TMNs in facilitating urban climate action, there have been few reflexive inquiries regarding how governance actors, institutions, and processes have transformed resulting from local governments’ participation in TMNs. In this chapter, I investigate how TMNs have promoted urban adaptation actions as well as their effects on local government climate policy processes. I first draw on the theories of multi-level governance, urban planning, and social innovation in the context of climate change to develop a framework for governing adaptation innovations through a model of contentious urban politics. I then apply this framework to explore climate adaptation processes in Rotterdam (The Netherlands) and Berkeley (California, United States), and examine the actors, resources, and networks involved in motivating, sustaining, and prioritizing adaptation across competing sectoral agendas. The results note that the successful and eventual uptake of adaptive innovations requires communicating competing interests, confronting conflicts, and building cross-sectoral coalitions. I conclude by arguing that a model of contentious politics, especially as advocated by TMNs, is more appropriate to understand how governance innovations can be harnessed to promote more climate adaptive cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andonova, L. B. (2013). Boomerangs to partnerships? Explaining state participation in transnational partnerships for sustainability. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., & Bulkesley, H. (2013). Transnational climate governance. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andonova, L. B., & Mitchell, R. B. (2010). The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 35, 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anguelovski, I., Chu, E., & Carmin, J. (2014). Variations in approaches to urban climate adaptation: Experiences and experimentation from the global south. Global Environmental Change, 27, 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, X., McAllister, R. R. J., Beaty, R. M., & Taylor, B. (2010). Urban policy and governance in a global environment: Complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. (2015). What a chief resilience officer does. http://www.100resilientcities.org/blog/entry/what-is-a-chief-resilience-officer1#/-_/.

  • Betsill, M., & Bulkeley, H. (2004). Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterly, 471–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, I. (2013). Analysing urban governance networks: Bringing regime theory back in. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(2), 276–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogason, P., & Musso, J. A. (2006). The democratic prospects of network governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, E., & Osbahr, H. (2010). Responses to climate change: Exploring organizational learning across internationally networked organizations for development. Environmental Education Research, 16(December), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. (2013). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., & Broto, C. V. (2015). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., & Tuts, R. (2013). Understanding urban vulnerability, adaptation and resilience in the context of climate change. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmin, J., Dodman, D., & Chu, E. (2013). Urban climate adaptation and leadership: From conceptual understanding to practical action. OECD Publishing, (26).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, E. (2016). The governance of climate change adaptation through urban policy experiments. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(6), 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2016). Inclusive approaches to urban climate adaptation planning and implementation in the global south. Climate Policy, 16(3), 372–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, E., & Schenk, T. (2017). Communicating about climate change with urban populations and decision-makers. In M. C. Nisbet (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Berkeley. (2009). Department of planning and development. Climate action plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Berkeley. (2015). Office of energy and sustainable development. Climate action plan progress update.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Berkeley. (2016). Office of energy and sustainable development. Berkeley resilience strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Rotterdam. (2009). Rotterdam climate proof. Rotterdam climate proof: The Rotterdam challenge on water and climate adaptation.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Rotterdam. (2013). Rotterdam climate proof. Rotterdam climate change adaptation strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Rotterdam. (2016). Rotterdam climate initiative. Rotterdam resilience strategy: Ready for the 21st century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D., & Thatcher, M. (2008). Network governance and multi-level delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzebo, A., & Stripple, J. (2015). Transnational adaptation governance: An emerging fourth era of adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FĂĽnfgeld, H. (2015). Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12(February), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giest, S., & Howlett, M. (2013). Comparative climate change governance: Lessons from european transnational municipal network management efforts. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(6), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. J. (2013). Between local innovation and global impact: Cities, networks, and the governance of climate change. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 19(3), 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1531–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2004). Creativity and urban governance. Policy Studies, 25(2), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 4016 (November 2014), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K., & Alber, G. (2009). Governing climate change in cities: Modes of urban climate governance in multi-level systems. Competitive Cities and Climate Change, 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck, H., & Simon, D. (2012). Fostering multiscalar collaboration and co-operation for effective governance of climate change adaptation. Urban Studies, 50(May), 1221–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Taedong. (2013). Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 108–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Altbach, P. G. (1966). Student politics and higher education in the United States. Comparative Education Review, 10(2), 320–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, E., Biesbroek, R., Huitema, D., & Jordan, A. (2014). Climate policy innovation: The adoption and diffusion of adaptation policies across Europe. Global Environmental Change, 29, 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham, T. G., Preston, B. L., Smith, T. F., Brooke, C., Gorddard, R., Withycombe, G., et al. (2011). Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(8), 889–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyseth, T. (2008). Network governance in contested urban landscapes. Planning Theory & Practice, 9(4), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., & Schroeder, H. (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, P., & Stripple, J. (2008). Beyond the public and private divide: Remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan G. Bellinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: List of Interviews

Assistant Director of Planning and Research. Association of Bay Area Governments. 15 December 2016.

Chief Resilience Officer. Department of City Development. City of Rotterdam. 24 August 2016.

Climate Action Program Manager. Energy and Sustainable Development Department. City of Berkeley. 18 August 2016.

Deputy Director of the Environment. DCMR. 9 December 2016.

Environmental Policy Advisor. Department of City Development. City of Rotterdam. 26 August 2016.

Innovation and Change Program Advisor. Department of Engineering. City of Rotterdam.17 October 2016.

Planner, Energy and Sustainable Development Department. City of Berkeley. 24 August 2016.

Resilience Planner. Association of Bay Area Governments. 6 December 2016.

Soil and Ground Water Division Manager. DCMR. 6 December 2016.

Sustainability Program Manager, Energy and Sustainable Development Department. City of Berkeley. 22 August 2016.

Appendix B: List of Public Meetings

Climate Action Plan Drafting Special Meeting. City Council Meeting. City of Berkeley. 9 January 2008.

Climate Action Plan Update & Resilience Strategy Planning Special Meeting. City Council Meeting. City of Berkeley. 9 June 2015.

Resilience Strategy Update Special Meeting. City Council Meeting. City of Berkeley. 3 November 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bellinson, R.G. (2018). Connecting the Dots: The Politics of Governing Urban Climate Adaptation Innovations Through Transnational Municipal Networks. In: Hughes, S., Chu, E., Mason, S. (eds) Climate Change in Cities. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65003-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics