Skip to main content

Introduction and Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corruption, Entrepreneurship, and Social Welfare

Abstract

Globalization and the recent global recession have been a problem for people around the world, in developed and developing countries. The effects have been stronger in developing countries. Proponents of globalization argue that globalization contributes to economic growth through technological development, entrepreneurship, innovative activity, increased efficiency, and productivity. Greater trade activity has put pressure on nations to compete with each other and put downward pressure on production costs. In the process, countries with low labor costs have been better able to take and benefit from opportunity. Yet the question of individual benefit vs. collective benefit from globalization remains unanswered. To shed light on this question, this book provides a deeper look into how home country institutions and resources can contribute to inclusive growth through entrepreneurship, as well as some of the key challenges faced by the entrepreneurs. We discuss how social welfare policies have changed through development and political environment, as well as some key challenges faced by the welfare policies. We explore how corruption affects the distribution of income generated through entrepreneurial activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rostow (1960) identified five stages of development.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Carlsson, B., & Karlsson, C. (1999). Entrepreneurship, small and medium-sized enterprises and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Africa Report. (2012). Outsourcing: The Indian connection and Africa. Retrieved July 31, 2016, from http://www.theafricareport.com/North-Africa/outsourcing-the-indian-connection-and-africa.html

  • Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H., & Stamm, A. (2008). Breakthrough? China’s and India’s transition from production to innovation. World Development, 36(2), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiti, M. (2001). Regional specialization and technical leapfrogging. Journal of Regional Science, 41(1), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. (2010). Say’s law, poverty persistence, and employment neglect. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 11(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. (2012). Grass roots war on poverty. World Economic Review, 1, 114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001a). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001b). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. In D. C. Mueller & U. Cantner (Eds.), Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century (pp. 23–40). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Auer, R. A., Degen, K., & Fischer, A. M. (2013). Low-wage import competition, inflationary pressure, and industry dynamics in Europe. European Economic Review, 59, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. The American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121–2168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2007). How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. The quarterly journal of Economics, 122(4), 1721–1758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, P., & Bhattarai, K. (2012). Cognitive skills, openness and growth. Economic Record, 88(280), 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship, productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1993). Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labour Economics, 7(5), 471–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. National Bureau of Economic Research (No. w16717).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(1), 87–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boskin, M. J. (2016, October). Out of ammunition to Combat Recession? Project Syndicate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugamelli, M., Schivardi, F., & Zizza, R. (2008). The Euro and firm restructuring. NBER Working Paper No. 14454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustos, P. (2011). Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms. The American Economic Review, 101(1), 304–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartiglia, F. (1997). Credit constraints and human capital accumulation in the open economy. Journal of International Economics, 43, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Growth and Development. (2008). Growth report: Strategies for sustained growth and inclusive development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016). Prices, markups, and trade reform. Econometrica, 84(2), 445–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. 2001. Growth Is Good for the Poor. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2587. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. M., & C. Paunov (2010). Does trade stimulate innovation? Evidence from firm-product data. OECD Development Centre Working Papers 286, OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B., & Kleiner, M. M. (2005). The last American shoe manufacturers: Decreasing productivity and increasing profits in the shift from piece rates to continuous flow production. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 44(2), 307–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorodnichenko, Y., Kukharskyy, B., & Roland, G. (2015). Culture and global sourcing. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. w21198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, J. (2015). New patterns of structural change and effects on inclusive development. WIDER Working Paper 2015/006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. J., & Schmitz, J. A. (2010). Competition and productivity: A review of evidence. Annual Review of Economics, 2, 619–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization. (2011). Decent work decade resource kit: Competitiveness, productivity and jobs. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_098152.pdf.

  • Long, N.V., Raff, H., & Stähler, F. (2011). Innovation and trade with heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics, 84(2), 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. (2012). Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, M. M. (2007). Fear of China: Is there a future for manufacturing in Latin America? World Development, 35(3), 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., Sachs, J. D., & McArthur, J. W. (2002). Executive summary: Competitiveness and stages of economic development. In M. E. Porter, J. D. Sachs, P. K. Cornelius, J. W. McArthur, & K. Schwab (Eds.), The global competitiveness report 2001–2002 (pp. 16–25). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G., & Fei, J. C. (1961). A theory of economic development. The American Economic Review, 51(4), 533–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S. (2013). Economics beyond the economists. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(33), 1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., Hay, M., & Camp, S. (1999). GEM global entrepreneurship monitor: 1999 executive report. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W. W. (1960). The process of economic growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2013). Poverty facts and stats. Retrieved July 22, 2016, from http://www.global issues.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Making globalization work. New York: s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syrquin, M. (1988). Patterns of structural change. Handbook of Development Economics, 1, 203–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2007). Corruption in the education sector. Working Paper #04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2015). Tax systems: A channel for corruption or a way to fight it? Working Paper #03.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). The millennium development goals report. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R.. (2001). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions and culture. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 01-030/3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. W., Kistruck, G. M., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2010). The entrepreneurship process in base of the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., Van Wennekers, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., & Gough, I. (2006). A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy. World Development, 34(10), 1696–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William J. Baumol, (1990) Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5, Part 1):893–921.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chowdhury, F., Desai, S., Audretsch, D.B. (2018). Introduction and Overview. In: Corruption, Entrepreneurship, and Social Welfare. SpringerBriefs in Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64916-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics