Skip to main content

Gender Equality Impact Assessment: A Core Element of Gender Budgeting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender Budgeting in Europe

Abstract

This chapter raises a series of questions on how gender budget analysis can reveal central concerns of gender equality as advanced by feminist economics and feminist public policy analysts. It discusses the importance of engaging in budgetary processes and decision-making to identify and eliminate the gendered effects across multiple policy domains including the care economy, definitions of gender equality, and the relevance of gender analysis to economic policy and decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is similar to the more familiar presentation of the distributional impact of a policy change on households ranked by income into quintiles, and the policy’s average effect on (equivalised) household net incomes within each quintile is shown. Any tax-benefit model, used to assess the effect of a policy change on different quintiles, can easily be adapted to show effects on gendered household types (Reed 2016).

  2. 2.

    This is even excluding the effects of cuts in public services, which are harder to allocate at an individual level, but for reasons given below and elsewhere in this book, are likely to have more severe impacts on the opportunities and incomes of women than men.

References

  • Bargawi, Hannah, Giovanni Cozzi, and Susan Himmelweit, eds. 2016. Economics and Austerity in Europe, Gendered Impacts and Sustainable Alternatives. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Fran, Jerome De Henau, and Sirin Sung. 2010. Within-Household Inequalities Across Classes? Management and Control of Money. In Gender Inequalities in the 21st Century: New Barriers and Continuing Constraints, ed. Jacqueline L. Scott, Rosemary Crompton, and Clare Lyonette, 215–241. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, Francesca, Marcella Corsi, Carlo D’Ippoliti, Antigone Lyberaki, Manuela Samek Lodovici, and Alina Verashchagina. 2013. The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Situation of Women and Men and on Gender Equality Policies. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/documents/130410_crisis_report_en.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2016.

  • Bonke, Jens, and Martin Browning. 2009. The Distribution of Financial Well-Being and Income Within the Household. Review of Economics of the Household 7 (1): 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracknell, Richard, and Richard Keen. 2016. Estimating the Gender Impact of Tax and Benefits Changes. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. SN06758. Source: researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06758/SN06758.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2016.

  • De Henau, Jerome. 2017. Costing and Funding Free Universal Childcare of High Quality. WBG Briefing. http://wbg.org.uk/analysis/costing-funding-free-universal-childcare-high-quality/. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.

  • De Henau, Jerome, and Susan Himmelweit. 2013. Unpacking Within-Household Gender Differences in Partners’ Subjective Benefits from Household Income. Journal of Marriage and Family 75 (3): 611–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Henau, Jerome, Susan Himmelweit, Zofia Łapniewska, and D. Diane Perrons. 2016. Investing in the Care Economy: A Gender Analysis of Employment Stimulus in Seven OECD Countries. Report by the UK Women’s Budget Group for the International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels. http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/care_economy_en.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2016.

  • Elson, Diane. 2015. Gender Budgeting and Macroeconomic Policy. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Work and Impact of Ailsa McKay, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 27–37. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, Diane, and Nilufer Çağatay. 2000. The Social Content of Macroeconomic Policies. World Development 28 (7): 1347–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginn, Jay, and Sara Arber. 1993. Pension Penalties: The Gendered Division of Occupational Welfare. Work, Employment & Society 7 (1): 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grown, Caren, and Imraan Valodia, eds. 2010. Taxation and Gender Equity: A Comparative Analysis of Direct and Indirect Taxes in Developing and Developed Countries. Abingdon and New York: Routledge & IDRC. http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/43684/1/IDL-43684.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2016.

  • The Guardian. 2010. Women Will Bear Brunt of Budget Cuts, Says Yvette Cooper. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/jul/04/women-budget-cuts-yvette-cooper

  • Himmelweit, Sue. 2015. Childcare as an Investment in Infrastructure. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Work and Impact of Ailsa McKay, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 83–93. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamessini, Maria, and Jill Rubery, eds. 2014. The Economic Crisis and the Future of Gender Equality. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Howard, and Jonathan Portes. 2014. Cumulative Impact Assessment. Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series Research Report 94. Source: https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication-download/research-report-94-cumulative-impact-assessment. Accessed 30 Oct 2016.

  • Reed, Howard. 2016. The Gender Impact of Austerity in the UK Under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government, 2010–15. In Economics and Austerity in Europe: Gendered Impacts and Sustainable Alternatives, ed. Hannah Bargawi, Giovanni Cozzi, and Susan Himmelweit. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, Jill. 2005. Reflections on Gender Mainstreaming: An Example of Feminist Economics in Action? Feminist Economics 11 (3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Public Sector Adjustment and the Threat to Gender Equality. In Public Sector Shock: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe, ed. Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead, 43–83. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar and ILO.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, Jill, and Koukiadaki, Aristea. 2016. Closing the Gender Pay Gap: A Review of the Issues, Policy Mechanisms and International Evidence. ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---gender/documents/publication/wcms_540889.pdf

  • Sen, Amartya. 1990. Gender and Cooperative Conflicts. In Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, ed. Irene Tinker, 123–149. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women’s Budget Group. 2016a. Autumn Financial Statement 2016: Women’s Budget Group Response. http://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/AFS2016_WBGreport_13Dec_final2.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.

  • ———. 2016b. New Research Shows That Poverty, Ethnicity and Gender Magnify the Impact of Austerity on BME Women. http://wbg.org.uk/news/new-research-shows-poverty-ethnicity-gender-magnify-impact-austerity-bme-women/. Accessed 14 Apr 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Himmelweit, S. (2018). Gender Equality Impact Assessment: A Core Element of Gender Budgeting. In: O'Hagan, A., Klatzer, E. (eds) Gender Budgeting in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64891-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64891-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64890-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64891-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics