Skip to main content

Poetry in and for Society: Poetic Messages, Creativity, and Social Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poetry And Imagined Worlds

Abstract

Poetry is far from being an escapist type of activity, removed from society and reduced to a personal form of expression. On the contrary, poetic expressions are not only social endeavors, they also create something with the potential to question society and engage people in political action. In making this claim, we trace back poetry to its etymological roots, the Greek term poiesis, designating the activity of “making” or “bringing into existence.” In this chapter, we illustrate the political power of poetic expressions or, more broadly, of creative making (poiesis), at the level of society. Concretely, we will take the case study of a recent social movement in Mexico, YoSoy132, which uses poetic messages, among other art forms, to protest against the political establishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Revista Proceso, Se globaliza #YoSoy132; cuenta con 52 células en distintas partes del mundo, August 1, 2012.

References

  • Arditi, B. (2015). The people as re-presentation and event. In C. de la Torre (Ed.), The promise and perils of populism (pp. 91–112). Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, W., Ross, D., & Brown, L. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aroch-Fugellie, P. (2013). Leverage: Artistic interventions of Mexican student movement. Journal of Latin American Studies, 22(4), 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad, S. H. (2017). Documenting a forbidden memory: Symbols in the changing city space of Cairo. Culture & Psychology, 23(2), 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad, S. H., Wagoner, B., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2016). The (street) art of resistance. In N. Chaudhary, P. Hviid, G. Marsico & J. W. Villadsen (Eds.), Rhythms of Resistance and Existence: An Introduction (pp. 161–180). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaban, O. (1990). Praxis and Poesis in Aristotle’s practical philosophy. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 24, 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. E. (2001). Symbolic action theory in cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 7(4), 479–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boros, D. (2012). Creative rebellion for the twenty-first century: The importance of public and interactive art to political life in America. NY: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnin, N., & Yu, J. (2004). The blackwell dictionary of western philosophy. MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope. Social movements in the internet age. MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colas [Recorded by Los Lobos]. (2005). On acoustic en vivo. USA: Los Lobos label.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements. An introduction (2nd ed.). MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz Cepeda, R. (2015). #Yo Soy 132: A networked social movement of mexican youth. In N. Konak & R. Özgür (Eds.), Waves of social movement mobilizations in the twenty-first century. Challenges to the neo-liberal world order and democracy (pp. 41–84). NY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1995). From art to politics: How artistic creations shape political conceptions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1986). Ecological approach to visual perception. NY: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G. P. (1980). Epilogue: A conception of situated action. In M. Brenner (Ed.), The structure of action (pp. 313–350). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Developing society: Reflections on the notion of societal creativity. In A. G. Tan & C. Perleth (Eds.), Creativity, culture, and development (pp. 183–200). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2009). The question concerning technology. In D. M. Klaplan (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of technology (pp. 9–24). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lledó, E. (1961). El concepto “Poíesis” en la filosofía griega. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Instituto Luis Vives de Filosofía.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manifesto #YOSOY132. (2012). Retrieved from https://pastebin.com/pxpfU8Nv

  • Macro fandango Masivo. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7Q1cRTubfQ

  • Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected writings: George Herbert Mead (A. J. Reck, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, T. (2007). The psychological dimensions of collective action, online. In A. Joinson, K. MaKenna, T. Postmes, & U. D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2010). The politics of aesthetics. In Dissensus. On politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storr, A. (1988). Solitude: A return to the self. NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, G. (Ed.). (2013). Encyclopedia of Latin American popular music. Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcintas, A. (2015). Intellectual disobedience in Turkey. In A. Yalcintas (Ed.), Creativity and humour in occupy movements (pp. 6–29). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Argüello Manresa, G., Glăveanu, V. (2017). Poetry in and for Society: Poetic Messages, Creativity, and Social Change. In: Lehmann, O., Chaudhary, N., Bastos, A., Abbey, E. (eds) Poetry And Imagined Worlds. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64858-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics