Skip to main content

Utilising Learning Analytics for Study Success: Reflections on Current Empirical Findings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The success of learning analytics in improving higher education students’ learning has yet to be proven systematically and based on rigorous empirical findings. Only a few works have tried to address this but limited evidence is shown. This chapter aims to form a critical reflection on empirical evidence demonstrating how learning analytics have been successful in facilitating study success in continuation and completion of students’ university courses. We present a critical reflection on empirical evidence linking study success and LA. Literature review contributions to learning analytics were first analysed, followed by individual experimental case studies containing research findings and empirical conclusions. Findings are reported focussing on positive evidence on the use of learning analytics to support study success, insufficient evidence on the use of learning analytics and link between learning analytics and intervention measures to facilitate study success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bote-Lorenzo, M., & Gomez-Sanchez, E. (2017). Predicting the decrease of engagement indicators in a MOOC. In International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham Shum, S., & McKay, T. A. (2018). Architecting for learning analytics. Innovating for sustainable impact. Educause Review, 53(2), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho da Silva, J., Hobbs, D., & Graf, S. (2014). Integrating an at-risk student model into learning management systems. In Nuevas Ideas en Informatica Educativa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics - It’s a DELICATE issue. A checklist for trusted learning analytics. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R., Brasher, A., Clow, D., Cooper, A., Hillaire, G., Mittelmeier, J., … Vuorikari, R. (2016). Research evidence on the use of learning analytics – Implications for education policy. In R. Vuorikari & J. Castano Munoz (Eds.). Joint Research Centre Science for Policy Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. & Clow, D. (2017). Where is the evidence? A call to action for learning analytics. In International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gašević, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Wiedmann, M., & Rummel, N. (2016). Determination of off-task/on-task behaviours. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlosta, M., Zdrahal, Z., & Zendulka, J. (2017). Ouroboros: Early identification of at-risk students without models based on legacy data. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Learning analytics. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (Vol. 2, pp. 447–451). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2017a). Are higher education institutions prepared for learning analytics? TechTrends, 61(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0154-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2017b). Learning analytics design. In L. Lin & J. M. Spector (Eds.), The sciences of learning and instructional design. Constructive articulation between communities (pp. 202–211). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D. C., & Dobozy, E. (2018). Informing learning design through analytics: Applying network graph analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., Greiff, S., & Gibson, D. C. (2018). Making use of data for assessments: Harnessing analytics and data science. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), International handbook of IT in primary and secondary education (2nd ed., pp. 649–663). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 923–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9477-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Tracey, M. W. (2016). Exploring the relationship of ethics and privacy in learning analytics and design: Implications for the field of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 877–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9480-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Widanapathirana, C. (2014). Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: Two case studies using support vector machines. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1-2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilis, S., & Gülbahar, Y. (2016). Learning analytics in distance education: A systematic literature review. Paper presented at the 9th European Distance and E-learning Network (EDEN) Research Workshop, Oldenburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah, D.-K. (2016). Learning analytics and digital badges: Potential impact on student retention in higher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9286-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manai, O., Yamada, H., & Thorn, C. (2016). Real-time indicators and targeted supports: Using online platform data to accelerate student learning. In International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, UK, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzouk, Z., Rakovic, M., Liaqat, A., Vytasek, J., Samadi, D., Stewart-Alonso, J., … Nesbit, J. C. (2016). What if learning analytics were based on learning science? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalized and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistilli, M. D., & Arnold, K. E. (2010). Purdue signals: Mining real-time academic data to enhance student success. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 15(3), 22–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C., Yeomans, M., Reich, J., Hulleman, C., & Gehlbach, H. (2016). Forecasting student achievement in MOOCs with natural language processing. In International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrico, C. S. (2018). Completion and retention in higher education. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018a). Features students really expect from learning analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018b). The importance of students’ motivational dispositions for designing learning analytics. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9188-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sclater, N., & Mullan, J. (2017). Learning analytics and student success – Assessing the evidence. Bristol, UK: JISC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchithra, R., Vaidhehi, V., & Iyer, N. E. (2015). Survey of learning analytics based on purpose and techniques for improving student performance. International Journal of Computer Applications, 111(1), 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickle, L. (2015). How universities are using data to stop students dropping out. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-professional/2015/jun/30/how-universities-are-using-data-to-stop-students-dropping-out

  • Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., & Duval, E. (2012). Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D., Huijser, H., & Heath, D. (2016). Putting an ethical lens on learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9464-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rose, C. (2013). “Turn on, tune in, drop out”: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In Neural Information Processing Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF, project number 16DHL1038).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Ifenthaler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ifenthaler, D., Mah, DK., Yau, J.YK. (2019). Utilising Learning Analytics for Study Success: Reflections on Current Empirical Findings. In: Ifenthaler, D., Mah, DK., Yau, J.YK. (eds) Utilizing Learning Analytics to Support Study Success. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64792-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64792-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64791-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64792-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics