Skip to main content

Caregiver Resilience: Improving Ergonomics for the Safety, Comfort, and Health of Caregivers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Family Caregiving

Abstract

Hospitals are not always functional for caregivers. Caregivers have to sit for long hours while they take care of patients. In addition, caregivers have to sleep on uncomfortable furniture in order to be in close proximity to their loved ones. Prolonged sitting with immobility in the knee and hip joints, and compression of the popliteal vein at the edge of the chair, results in reduced venous blood flow, which could lead to venous thrombosis. In addition, inadequate sleep as a result of using uncomfortable furniture along with caregiver responsibilities and worries can lead to a diminished ability to think and make decisions, and have a negative impact on the health of the caregiver. Novel ergonomic design interventions such as the Venous Chair to help improve venous blood flow for seated activities and the Sit2Sleep furniture for sleeping are therefore essential to improve the physical and psychological resilience of caregivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailey, W. A. & Gordon, S. R. (2016). Family caregiving amidst age-associated cognitive changes: Implications for practice and future generations. Family Relations, (65). doi:10.1111/fare.12176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellucci, H. I., Arezes, P. M., & Viviani, A. A. (2010). Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools. Applied Ergonomics, 41, 563–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC Fact Sheet on the State of Aging and Health in America. (2013). Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.cdc.gov/features/agingandhealth/state_of_aging_and_health_in_america_2013.pdf

  • Charles Alan. (2015). ProBax technology in Charles Alan seating. Retrieved January 9, 2017, from http://www.charlesalaninc.com/probax/

  • Dahl, R. E., & Lewin, D. S. (2002). Pathways to adolescent health: Sleep regulation and behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 479–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dianat, I., Karimi, M. A., Hashemi, A. A., & Bahrampour, S. (2013). Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: Proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, J. (2011). Sleep deficit, fatigue, and health in family caregivers of persons with dementia awaiting placement. Master of Nursing Thesis in Aging. Edmonton: University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannetti, E. R., & Wolff, J. L. (2010). Cross-survey differences in national estimates of numbers of caregivers of disabled older adults. The Milbank Quarterly, 88, 310–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouvali, M. K., & Boudolos, K. (2006). Match between school furniture dimensions and children’s anthropometry. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 765–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helander, M. G., & Zhang, L. (1997). Filed studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Ergonomics, 40, 895–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. S., Hubbard, R. L., Struckmeyer, K. M., & Spencer, T. A. (this volume). Family resilience and caregiving.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroemer, K. H. E. (1989). Engineering anthropometry. Ergonomics, 32, 767–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B., Jung, K., Jeong, J., Kim, J., Hong, W., Park, S., & You, H. (2015). Ergonomic evaluation of console chairs for a weapon locating radar. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting (pp. 1409–1413).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maolne, E. B., & Dellinger, B. A. (2011). Furniture design features and healthcare outcomes. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from https://www.healthdesign.org/sites/default/files/FurnitureOutcomes_2011.pdf

  • Mittermayr, M., Fries, D., Gruber, H., Peer, S., Klingler, A., Fischbach, U., … Schobersberger, W.(2007). Leg edema formation and venous blood flow velocity during a simulated long-haul flight. Thrombosis Research, 120, 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenbroek, J. F. M., Kroon-Ramaekers, Y. M. T., & Snijders, C. J. (2003). Revision of the design of a standard for the dimensions of school furniture. Ergonomics, 46, 681–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niinimaki, K., & Koskinen, I. (2011). I love this dress, it makes me feel beautiful! Empathic knowledge in sustainable design. The Design Journal: An International Journal of all Aspects of Design, 14, 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keeffe, M., Dankaerts, W., O’Sullivan, P., O’Sullivan, L., & O’Sullivan, K. (2013). Specific flexion-related low back pain and sitting: Comparison of seated discomfort on two different chairs. Ergonomics, 56, 650–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, H., Ebine, Y., Ando, T., & Noro K. (2004). Measurement of venous blood flow in the lower limbs: Prevention of deep vein thrombosis during prolonged sitting. In Proceedings of the International Conference WWCS, Kuala Lumpur (Vol. 7, pp. 302–305).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, M., & Zimring, C. (2008). A review of the empirical literature on the relationship between indoor environments and stress in healthcare and office settings: Problems and prospects of sharing evidence. Environment and Behavior, 40(2), 151–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochelman, K., Albert, N., Spence, J., Murray, T., & Slifcak, E. (2012). Patients and their families weigh in on evidence based hospital design. Critical Care Nurse, 32, e1–e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya Jayadas Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Survey for Use with the Venous Chair

Please complete this questionnaire. Your name will not be included with this questionnaire, so your responses are completely confidential . Please circle the number and/or write your responses.

  1. 1.

    Age

  2. 2.

    Gender:

  3. 3.

    Ethnicity:

  4. 4.

    How long does it take for you to come to the hospital?

  5. 5.

    How long are you expected to stay in the hospital during this visit?

  6. 6.

    What is the reason for your hospital visit?

Based on your experience after using the Venous Chair, please answer the following questions:

  • (1) Strongly agree, (2) Agree, (3) Neutral, (4) Disagree, (5) Strongly disagree

Description

1

2

3

4

5

1. I have sore muscles

     

2. My back hurts

     

3. I feel stiff

     

4. I feel tired

     

5. I feel pain

     

6. I feel numb

     

7. I feel uneven pressure

     

8. I feel cramped

     

9. I feel relaxed

     

10. I feel refreshed

     

11. I feel restful

     

12. I feel pleased

     

13. I feel comfortable

     

14. I feel the furniture is spacious

     

15. I feel the furniture is visually appealing

     

16. I like the furniture

     

Appendix 2: Interview Questions After Using the Venous Chair

  1. 1.

    What are your overall impressions of the furniture?

  2. 2.

    What was your impression of the material of the furniture?

  3. 3.

    If you had to give the furniture a grade, from A to F, where A was outstanding and F was very poor, what grade would you give the furniture?

    1. (a)

      Why would you give the furniture this grade?

  4. 4.

    What did you like best about the furniture?

  5. 5.

    Was there anything you found less appealing about the furniture?

  6. 6.

    Raise any critical incidents observed when the individual was seated on the furniture —explore as much as possible one incident at a time: What were the actions that you think led up to the incident? What was the problem? How did you try to resolve it? What were you thinking at that time? etc.

  7. 7.

    Did you find similarities or differences between this piece of furniture and others you have used in the past?

  8. 8.

    Are there features you would like to see added to the furniture? If so, what?

  9. 9.

    If you could suggest one change to this furniture, what change would you suggest?

  10. 10.

    Would you consider using this furniture in the future? _____ Why/why not?

  11. 11.

    Would you recommend this furniture to a friend or relative? _____ Why/why not?

  12. 12.

    Do you have any other questions or comments based on your experience with the furniture?

Appendix 3: Survey for Use After Using the Sit2Sleep Furniture

Please complete this questionnaire. Your name will not be included with this questionnaire, so your responses are completely confidential . Please circle the number and/or write your responses.

  1. 1.

    Age:

  2. 2.

    Gender:

  3. 3.

    Ethnicity:

  4. 4.

    How long does it take for you to come to the hospital?

  5. 5.

    How long are you expected to stay in the hospital during this visit?

  6. 6.

    What is the reason for your hospital visit?

Based on your experience after using the Sit2Sleep, please answer the following questions:

  • (1) Strongly agree, (2) Agree, (3) Neutral, (4) Disagree, (5) Strongly disagree

Description

1

2

3

4

5

1. I have sore muscles

     

2. My back hurts

     

3. I feel stiff

     

4. I feel tired

     

5. I feel pain

     

6. I feel numb

     

7. I feel uneven pressure

     

8. I feel cramped

     

9. I feel relaxed

     

10. I feel refreshed

     

11. I feel restful

     

12. I feel pleased

     

13. I feel comfortable

     

14. I feel the furniture is spacious

     

15. I feel the furniture is visually appealing

     

16. I like the furniture

     

17. I feel the furniture is easy to transform

     

18. I feel the furniture serves multiple purposes

     

Appendix 4: Interview Questions After Using the Sit2Sleep Furniture

  1. 1.

    What are your overall impressions of the furniture?

  2. 2.

    What was your impression of the material of the furniture?

  3. 3.

    If you had to give the furniture a grade, from A to F, where A was outstanding and F was very poor, what grade would you give the furniture?

    1. (a)

      Why would you give the furniture this grade?

  4. 4.

    What did you like best about the furniture?

  5. 5.

    Was there anything you found less appealing about the furniture?

  6. 6.

    Raise any critical incidents observed when the individual was seated on the furniture —explore as much as possible one incident at a time: What were the actions that you think led up to the incident? What was the problem? How did you try to resolve it? What were you thinking at that time? etc.

  7. 7.

    Did you find similarities or differences between this piece of furniture and others you have used in the past?

  8. 8.

    Are there features you would like to see added to the furniture? If so, what?

  9. 9.

    If you could suggest one change to this furniture, what change would you suggest?

  10. 10.

    Would you consider using this furniture in the future? _____ Why/why not?

  11. 11.

    Would you recommend this furniture to a friend or relative? _____ Why/why not?

  12. 12.

    Do you have any other questions or comments based on your experience with the furniture?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jayadas, A., Kang, M. (2018). Caregiver Resilience: Improving Ergonomics for the Safety, Comfort, and Health of Caregivers. In: Bailey, W., Harrist, A. (eds) Family Caregiving. Emerging Issues in Family and Individual Resilience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64783-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64783-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64782-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64783-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics