Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The History of MNI in North American Zooarchaeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zooarchaeology in Practice

Abstract

North American zooarchaeologists’ use of the minimum number of individuals (MNI) quantitative unit began early in the twentieth century, prior to the discipline’s received wisdom that Theodore White introduced it. Frequencies of publications indicate that MNI’s popularity grew in the 1960s as a result of White’s innovative technique for estimating meat weight and his demonstration (if not explanation) of how to determine MNI values from tallies of particular skeletal parts (e.g., left distal humerus) in order to infer butchering practices. Use of MNI also increased as a result of a desire to measure taxonomic abundances with a quantitative unit that accounted for intertaxonomic variation in the number of identifiable skeletal elements per carcass and in fragmentation intensity. Knowing zooarchaeology’s history is critical to avoiding disciplinary amnesia and previously noted analytical pitfalls. Further, historical knowledge reveals target variables early zooarchaeologists sought to measure and why they chose particular measured variables—in this case, MNI—to monitor those target variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, W. R. (1949a). Faunal remains from the Angel site. Unpublished master’s thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. R. (1949b). Food animals used by the Indians at the Angel site. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 59, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badgley, C. (1986). Counting individuals in mammalian fossil assemblages from fluvial environments. PALAIOS, 1, 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, K. A. (1979). An analysis of the faunal assemblage from the Elam site: An upper Mississippian seasonal encampment on the Kalamazoo River in Allegan County, Michigan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1968a). Archeological perspectives. In S. R. Binford & L. R. Binford (Eds.), New perspectives in archeology (pp. 5–32). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1968b). Some comments on historical versus processual archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24, 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1978). Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1981). Bones: Ancient men and modern myths. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1984). Faunal remain from Klasies River Mouth. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R., & Bertram, J. B. (1977). Bone frequencies—and attritional processes. In L. R. Binford (Ed.), For theory building in archaeology (pp. 77–153). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogan, A. E. (1976). A zooarchaeological analysis of vertebrate remains from Chota-Tanasi, a historic Cherokee village in east Tennessee. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogan, A. E., Curren, C. B., Jr., Noble, A. W., & Robison, N. D. (1978). A bibliography for zooarchaeology with an emphasis on eastern North America. In A. E. Bogan & N. D. Robison (Eds.), A history and selected bibliography of zooarchaeology in Eastern North America (pp. 23–92). Knoxville: Tennessee Anthropological Association. Miscellaneous Paper No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogan, A. E., Robison, N. D., & Bogan, C. M. (1987). Bibliography of zooarchaeology. In A. E. Bogan & N. D. Robison (Eds.), The zooarchaeology of Eastern North America: History, method and theory, and bibliography (pp. 66–202). Knoxville: Tennessee Anthropological Association. Miscellaneous Paper No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, C. K. (1967). Hottentot food remains and their bearing on the interpretation of fossil bone assemblages. Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station, 32, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, C. K. (1969). The contribution of the Namib Desert Hottentots to an understanding of australopithecine bone accumulations. Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station, 39, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, C. K. (1976). Some principles in the interpretation of bone accumulations associated with man. In G. L. Isaac & E. R. McCown (Eds.), Human origins: Louis Leakey and the East African evidence (pp. 97–116). Menlo Park, CA: W.B. Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, H. T. (1982). Meat-eating and human evolution: Studies on the diet and subsistence patterns of Plio-Pleistocene hominids in East Africa. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, H. T. (1986). Patterns of skeletal element representation and hominid subsistence activities at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, and Koobi Fora, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 15, 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, H. T., & Kroll, E. M. (1986). Systematic butchery by Plio/Pleistocene hominids at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Current Anthropology, 27, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, W. H. (1961). A fauna from an Indian site near Redington, Arizona. Journal of Mammalogy, 42, 115–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casteel, R. W. (1977a). Characterization of faunal assemblages and the minimum number of individuals determined from paired elements: Continuing problems in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 4, 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casteel, R. W. (1977b). A consideration of the behaviour of the minimum number of individuals index: A problem in faunal characterization. OSSA, 3(4), 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The study of animal bones from archaeological sites. London: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. E. (1960). Analysis of the animal remains in the prehistoric Ozark Bluff dwellings of Northwest Arkansas. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. E. (1966). The prehistoric animal ecology and ethnology of the upper Great Lakes Region. Anthropological Papers No. 29. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, I. W. (1956). Bones for the archaeologist. London: Phoenix House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, P. (1969). Approaches to faunal analysis in archaeology. American Antiquity, 34, 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J. (1970). Archeology as social science. In A. Fischer (Ed.), Current directions in anthropology: A special issue (pp. 115–125). American Anthropological Association, Bulletin 3(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, G. N. (1999). What science is and how it works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (2012). Critical review of the MNI (minimum number of individuals) as a zooarchaeological unit of quantification. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 4, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity, 43, 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, K. F. (2003). The noble beast: Status and differential access to animals in the Maya world. World Archaeology, 34, 498–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, J. T., & Gordon, A. D. (2007). Skeletal element abundances in archaeofaunal assemblages: Economic utility, sample size, and assessment of carcass transport strategies. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 872–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. V. (1967). The vertebrate fauna and hunting patterns. In D. Byers (Ed.), The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley (pp. 132–178). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, B. M. (1969). Some aspects of diet and butchering techniques among prehistoric Indians in South Dakota. Plains Anthropologist, 14, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1973). On the methodology of faunal analysis. American Antiquity, 38, 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1978). Minimum numbers and sample size in vertebrate faunal analysis. American Antiquity, 43, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1979). On the quantification of vertebrate archaeofaunas. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 199–237). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. K. (1984). Quantitative zooarchaeology: Topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilday, J. E. (1963). Bone refuse from the Oakfield site, Genesee County, New York. Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 33, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilday, J. E., Parmalee, P. W., & Tanner, D. P. (1962). Aboriginal butchering techniques at the Eschelman site (36 La 12), Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 32(2), 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag, W. G. (1948). An osteometric analysis of some aboriginal dogs. University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology, 7(3), 107–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heizer, R. F. (1960). Physical analysis of habitation residues. In R. F. Heizer & S. F. Cook (Eds.), The application of quantitative methods in archaeology (pp. 93–157). Chicago: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology No. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. (1930). A census of Pleistocene birds of Rancho La Brea from the collections of the Los Angeles Museum. Condor, 32, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, T. F. (1967). The Boarding School Bison Drive site. Plains Anthropologist Memoir, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, T. F. (1973). The Gull Lake site: A prehistoric bison drive site in Southwestern Saskatchewan. Milwaukee Public Museum, Publications in Anthropology and History No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, T. F., & Kehoe, A. B. (1960). Observations on the butchering technique at a prehistoric bison kill in Montana. American Antiquity, 25, 420–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G., & Cruz-Uribe, K. (1984). The analysis of animal bones from archeological sites. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1968). The history of science. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 14, 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain, D. (1967). Faunal remains. In E. B. Jelks (Ed.), The Gilbert site: A Norteño site in Northeastern Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological Society 37 (pp. 225–243).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain, D. (1968). Analysis of the bison bones from Bonfire Shelter. In D. S. Dibble & D. Lorrain (Eds.), Bonfire Shelter: A stratified bison kill site, Val Verde County, Texas (pp. 77–134). Texas Memorial Museum Miscellaneous Papers No. 1. Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (1979). Archaeological faunal analysis: A bibliography. Occasional Papers of the Idaho Museum of Natural History, No. 31. Pocatello.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (1984). Bone density and differential survivorship of fossil classes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 3, 259–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (1985). Bone frequencies: Differential transport, in situ destruction, and the MGUI. Journal of Archaeological Science, 12, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (1994a). Quantitative units and terminology in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity, 59, 36–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (1994b). Relative abundances of skeletal specimens and taphonomic analysis of vertebrate remains. PALAIOS, 9, 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2006). Identifying bilateral pairs of deer (Odocoileus sp.) bones: How symmetrical is symmetrical enough? Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1237–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2008). Quantitative paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2012). Lewis R. Binford’s impact on zooarchaeology: A consideration of three volumes (and assorted other things) that altered the way we think about the bones of human prey. Ethnoarchaeology, 4, 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2015a). The history of “laundry lists” in North American zooarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 39, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2015b). On the variable relationship between NISP and NTAXA in bird remains and in mammal remains. Journal of Archaeological Science, 53, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2016). Theodore E. White and the development of zooarchaeology in North America. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. M. (1937). Pinnipeds and a sea otter from the point Mugu Shell Mound of California. University of California at Los Angeles Publications in Biological Sciences, 1, 133–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. S. (1971). The revolution in archaeology. American Antiquity, 36, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, G., & Segal, E. M. (1969). The game of science. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medlock, R. C. (1975). Determining the minimum number of individuals in archeological faunal analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meighan, C. W., Pendergast, D. M., Swartz, B. K., & Wissler, M. D. (1958). Ecological interpretation in archaeology, part I. American Antiquity, 24, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, W. T., Gut, H. J., & Brodkorb, P. (1956). Animal remains from four preceramic sites in Florida. American Antiquity, 21, 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T. (2000). The archaeology of animal bones. College Station, TX: A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. J. (1971). Zooarchaeology: Animal bones in archaeology and their interpretation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Module in Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmalee, P. W. (1965). The food economy of archaic and woodland peoples at the Tick Creek site, Missouri. Missouri Archaeologist, 27(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, H. E. D., & Ray, C. E. (1957). Notes on vertebrate remains from Mayapan. In Current reports (Vol. 41, pp. 633–656). Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute, Department of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quitmyer, I. R. (2003). Zooarchaeology of Cinnamon Bay, St. Johns, U.S. Virgin Islands: Pre-Columbian overexploitation of animal resources. In F. W. King & C. M. Porter (Eds.), Zooarchaeology: Papers to honor Elizabeth S. Wing (pp. 131–158). Florida Museum of Natural History Bulletin, Vol. 44(1). Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C. A. (1963). Osteo-archaeology. In D. Brothwell & E. Higgs (Eds.), Science in archaeology (pp. 204–216). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E. J. (1993). Zooarchaeology. In J. K. Johnson (Ed.), The development of Southeastern archaeology (pp. 109–131). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E. J. (2003). Resource use through time at Paloma, Peru. In F. W. King & C. M. Porter (Eds.), Zooarchaeology: Papers to honor Elizabeth S. Wing (pp. 65–80). Florida Museum of Natural History Bulletin, Vol. 44(1). Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (1999). Zooarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, N. D. (1977). A zooarchaeological analysis of the Mississippian faunal remains from the Normandy Reservoir. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, N. D. (1978). Zooarchaeology: Its history and development. In A. E. Bogan & N. D. Robison (Eds.), A history and selected bibliography of zooarchaeology in Eastern North America (pp. 1–22). Miscellaneous Paper No. 2. Knoxville: Tennessee Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, N. D. (1987). Zooarchaeology: Its history and development. In A. E. Bogan & N. D. Robison (Eds.), The zooarchaeology of Eastern North America: History, method and theory, and bibliography (pp. 1–26). Miscellaneous Paper No. 12. Knoxville: Tennessee Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1979). Some impacts of cultural resource management on American archaeology. In J. R. McKinlay & K. L. Jones (Eds.), Archaeological resource management in Australia and Oceania (pp. 1–11). Wellington: New Zealand Historic Places Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotwell, J. A. (1955). An approach to the paleoecology of mammals. Ecology, 30, 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. D. (1975). Middle Mississippi exploitation of animal populations. Anthropological Papers No. 57. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. D. (1976). “Twitching”: A minor ailment affecting human paleoecological research. In C. E. Cleland (Ed.), Cultural change and continuity: Essays in honor of James Bennett Griffin (pp. 275–292). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, D. J. (1976). The Walakpa Site, Alaska: Its place in the Birknirk and Thule cultures.Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology No. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. M. (2002). Past and present zooarchaeology in Canada. Archaeofauna, 11, 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. L. (2003). Zooarchaeology: Where have we been and where are we going? In K. M. Stewart & F. L. Stewart (Eds.), Transitions in zooarchaeology: New methods and new results (pp. 135–150). Canadian Zooarchaeology Supplement 1. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Museum of Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiner, M. C. (2005). The faunas of Hayonim Cave, Israel: A 200,000-year record of Paleolithic diet, demography, and society. American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin 48. New Haven, CT: Harvard University, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, C. (1929). A census of the Pleistocene mammals of Rancho La Brea, based on the collections of the Los Angeles Museum. Journal of Mammalogy, 10, 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, L. C. (1983). The Horner Site: Taphonomy of an early Holocene bison bonebed. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, L. C. (1987). Taphonomy of the Horner II bone bed. In G. C. Frison & L. C. Todd (Eds.), The Horner site: The type site of the Cody Cultural Complex (pp. 107–198). Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., & Redman, C. L. (1971). Explanation in archeology: An explicitly scientific approach. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1952a). Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples: No. 1. American Antiquity, 17, 337–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1952b). Suggestions on the butchering technique of the inhabitants of the Dodd and Phillips Ranch sites in Oahe Reservoir area. Plains Archaeological Conference News Letter, 5, 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1953a). A method of calculating the dietary percentage of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity, 18, 396–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1953b). Studying osteological material. Plains Archaeological Conference News Letter, 6(1), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1953c). Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples: No. 2. American Antiquity, 19, 160–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1954). Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples: Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 6. American Antiquity, 19, 254–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1955). Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples: Nos. 7, 8, and 9. American Antiquity, 21, 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, E. S. (1962). Succession of mammalian faunas on Trinidad, West Indies. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, E. S. (1963a). Vertebrate remains from the Wash Island site. Florida Anthropologist, 16, 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, E. S. (1963b). Vertebrates from the Jungerman and Goodman sites near the east coast of Florida. Contributions to the Florida State Museum Social Sciences, 10, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. R. (1962). Notes on the bison bone from the Paul Brave, Huff, and Demery sites (Oahe Reservoir). Plains Anthropologist, 7, 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. R. (1968). Mississippian hunting and butchering patterns: Bone from the Vista Rockshelter (23-SR-20), Missouri. American Antiquity, 33, 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A. C. (1965). The role of faunal remains in archaeological investigations. Sacramento Anthropological Society and Central California Archaeological Foundation Papers, 3,47–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Chistina Giovas and Aaron Poteate for asking me to participate in the 79th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology where an initial (much shorter) version of this paper was presented. They and two anonymous referees identified important ways to make a longer version better.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    R. Lee Lyman

Authors
  1. R. Lee Lyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Lee Lyman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

    Christina M. Giovas

  2. Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

    Michelle J. LeFebvre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee Lyman, R. (2018). The History of MNI in North American Zooarchaeology. In: Giovas, C., LeFebvre, M. (eds) Zooarchaeology in Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64763-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64763-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64761-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64763-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation