Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Ulcers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Acute Care Surgery

Abstract

Perforation remains a potential lethal complication of peptic ulcer disease. The surgeon should have a high degree of suspicion for perforated ulcer when a patient presents with sudden onset of severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, fever and peritonitis. This can rapidly progress to septic shock if the diagnosis and treatment are delayed. The goal of laparoscopic peptic ulcer repair is no different than that of the open repair, namely, source control through sealing of the perforation and peritoneal irrigation. This chapter describes laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcer including primary repair and Graham patch technique focusing on operating room set-up, instrumentation, operative steps, contraindications and post-operative care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Key References

  1. Muller MK, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer repair: factors predicting conversion in laparoscopy and postoperative septic complications. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart B, et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e9–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soreide K, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1288–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(6):1231–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang AY, Peura DA. The prevalence and incidence of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease and upper gastrointestinal bleeding throughout the world. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2011;21(4):613–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lau JY, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion. 2011;84(2):102–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang YR, Richter JE, Dempsey DT. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Ann Surg. 2010;251(1):51–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thorsen K, Soreide JA, Soreide K. What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(7):1261–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Salama NR, Hartung ML, Muller A. Life in the human stomach: persistence strategies of the bacterial pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(6):385–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Svanes C, et al. Smoking and ulcer perforation. Gut. 1997;41(2):177–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cid T. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2013;18(Suppl 1):12–7. doi:10.1111/hel.12076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dakubo JC, Naaeder SB, Clegg-Lamptey JN. Gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer perforation. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(3):100–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soreide K, Thorsen K, Soreide JA. Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(1):91–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirschowitz BI, Simmons J, Mohnen J. Clinical outcome using lansoprazole in acid hypersecretors with and without Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a 13-year prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3(1):39–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar A, et al. The etiology of pneumoperitoneum in the 21st century. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):542–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thorsen K, et al. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(8):1329–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghekiere O, et al. Value of computed tomography in the diagnosis of the cause of nontraumatic gastrointestinal tract perforation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31(2):169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Furukawa A, et al. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30(5):524–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor H. Perforated peptic ulcer; treated without operation. Lancet. 1946;2(6422):441–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Crofts TJ, et al. A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(15):970–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD004778.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Siu WT, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235(3):313–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Byrge N, et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Am J Surg. 2013;206(6):957–62. discussion 962-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. World J Surg. 2005;29(10):1299–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2005;92(10):1195–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lagoo SA, Pappas TN. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 2002;235(3):320–1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lagoo S, McMahon RL, kakihara M, Pappas T, Eubanks S. The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. JSLS. 2002;6(4):359–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pappas TN. Laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcer and Vagotomy. In: Pappas TN, Chekan EG, Eubanks S, editors. Atlas of laparoscopic surgery. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lunca Y. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Jurnalul de Chirurgie. 2007;3(2):1584–9341.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mancini GJ, Mancini ML. Peptic ulcer surgery. In: Vernon AH, Ashley SW, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgical techniques. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walsh CJ, Khoo DE, Motson RW. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1993;80(1):127.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Michelet I, Agresta F. Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(5):405–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nathanson LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1990;4(4):232–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. So JB, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1996;10(11):1060–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Khoursheed M, et al. Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(1):56–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Robertson GS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(1):6–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Boshnaq TA, Martini I, Doughan S. Utilisation of the falciform ligament pedicle flap as an alternative approach for the repair of a perforated gastric ulcer. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;10 doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-213025.

  38. Munro WS, Bajwa F, Menzies D. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers with a falciform ligament patch. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996;78(4):390–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Costalat G, Alquier Y. Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer using the ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH). Surg Endosc. 1995;9(6):677–9. discussion 680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(12):1565–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Halkic N, Pescatore P, Gillet M. Laparoscopic-endoscopic management of perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer. Endoscopy. 1999;31(9):S64–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Matsuda M, et al. Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 1995;221(3):236–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Seelig MH, et al. Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37(3):226–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pai D, et al. Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69(3):210–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee FY, et al. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg. 2001;136(1):90–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Thompson AR, et al. Laparoscopic plication of perforated ulcer: results of a selective approach. South Med J. 1995;88(2):185–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moller MH, et al. Preoperative prognostic factors for mortality in peptic ulcer perforation: a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(7–8):785–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Urbano D, et al. Alternative laparoscopic management of perforated peptic ulcers. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(10):1208–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Abd Ellatif ME, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: patch versus simple closure. Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):948–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wong CS, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for prevention of ulcer recurrence after simple closure of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Surg Res. 2013;182(2):219–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yuan Y, et al. Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD008337.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kumar P, Khan HM, Hasanrabba S. Treatment of perforated giant gastric ulcer in an emergency setting. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;6(1):5–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading

  • Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1231–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. World J Surg. 2005;29:1299–310. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-7705-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller M, Wrann S, Widmer J, Klasen J, Weber M, Hahnloser D. Perforated peptic ulcer repair: factors predicting conversion in laparoscopy and postoperative septic complications. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD004778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Møller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, Søreide JA. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015;386:1288–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liane S. Feldman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

(MOV 293508 kb) (MOV 293508 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Al Mahroos, M.H., Feldman, L.S. (2018). Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Ulcers. In: Khwaja, K., Diaz, J. (eds) Minimally Invasive Acute Care Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64723-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64723-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64721-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64723-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics