Abstract
This essay considers certain cognitive constraints upon the possibility of understanding complexity, as a first step towards identifying the most effective ways of negotiating with those constraints. Its premise is that our narrative understanding of systemic behaviour latches onto the system’s emergent behaviour, at the cost of a disregard for how this emergent behaviour is actually being produced. This limit on narrative understanding points to a cognitive borderland, in which our cognitive engagement with complexity is felt as an “edge of sense” phenomenon. I pursue the qualities of this feeling in relation to the (rather surprising) attempts to define emergence in terms of surprise, and put the notion of surprise in narrative context by invoking Alfred Hitchcock’s well-known distinction between surprise and suspense. Doing so provides a way to clarify the affective dimension of the observer’s experience of emergence, and locates it in a certain double relation to knowledge in narrative. This double perspective clarifies the respect in which things may appear to make sense even while we are unable to make sense of them; an affective experience I equate with wonder. Wonder is, among other things, a religious feeling that conforms to this double perspectival structure by positing that the order of things, whilst eluding us, submits to omniscient cognition. I situate omniscience in relation to its literary analogue, omniscient narration, and contrast it with the position of the character narrator, in the middest—drawing upon Don DeLillo’s White Noise as example. DeLillo’s novel provides a suggestive link to The Cloud of Unknowing and a mystical tradition of understanding as a feeling, and even a relinquishing of knowledge. I end by relating this mystical sense of wonder to the unnarratable, and consider how it can help clarify our cognitive difficulties with emergence in complex systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, Ronald et al. (1999).
- 2.
Quoted in Truffaut (1984, p. 73).
- 3.
See Sternberg (2003, p. 327) for a related tripartite distinction between suspense, curiosity and surprise as universals of narrative dynamics characterized, respectively, by prospection, retrospection and recognition.
- 4.
Kermode (1967, passim), who is himself invoking Sidney’s Apology for Poetry: “a Poet thrusteth into the middest, euen where it most concerneth him, and there recoursing to the thinges forepaste, and diuining of thinges to come, maketh a pleasing analysis of all” (quoted p. 181). Kermode’s reflections on the consolations of narrative closure are the foundation for my own here.
- 5.
OED, “wonder” (n.) senses 2b, 4a, 7a; “wonder” (v.) senses 1, 2.
- 6.
- 7.
In The American Mystery, Tanner (2000) has written very pertinently on Underworld.
- 8.
- 9.
This is, I think, in tune with Shklovsky’s thought when he explains the Russian Formalist concept of defamiliarization, or estrangement, as both the arch-literary artifice of “baring the device” (Shklovsky 1965b, pp. 26–30) and a way to “make the stone stony ... to increase the difficulty and length of perception” (Shklovsky 1965a, p. 12).
References
Abbott HP (2013) Real mysteries: narrative and the unknowable. Ohio State University Press, Columbus
Auyoung E (2013) Partial cues and narrative understanding in Anna Karenina. In: Bernaerts L, Herman L, Vervaeck B, de Geest D (eds) Stories and minds: cognitive approaches to literary narrative. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 59–80
Benjamin W (1970) The storyteller: reflections on the works of Nikolai Leskov [1955]. In: Illuminations. Jonathan Cape, London
Branigan E (1992) Narrative comprehension and film. Routledge, New York
Brooks P (1984) Reading for the plot: design and intention in narrative. Knopf, New York
Crutchfield JP, Young K (1990) Computation at the onset of chaos. In: Zurek WH (ed) Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, pp 223–269
Dawson P (2009) The return of omniscience in contemporary fiction. Narrative 17(2):143–161
DeLillo D (1986) White noise [1984]. Pan Books, London
DeLillo D (1997) Underworld. Simon & Schuster, New York
Hall DD (1990) Worlds of wonder, days of judgment: popular religious belief in early new England. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hitchkock A (1970) AFI seminar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Xs111uH9ss
Kermode F (1967) The sense of an ending: studies in the theory of fiction. Oxford University Press, New York
Kubík A (2003) Toward a formalization of emergence. Artificial Life 9(1):41–65
Minsky M (1986) The society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New York
Ronald EA, Sipper M, Capcarrère MS (1999) Design, observation, surprise! a test of emergence. Artificial Life 5:225–239
Shklovsky V (1965a) Art as technique In: Lemon LT, Reis MJ (trans) Russian formalist criticism: four essays. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 3–24
Shklovsky V (1965b) Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: stylistic commentary. In: Lemon LT, Reis MJ (trans) Russian formalist criticism: four essays. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 25–59
Spearing AC (trans) (2001) The cloud of unknowing and other works. Penguin, London
Sternberg M (2003) Universals of narrative and their cognitivist fortunes (I). Poet Today 24(2):297–395
Tanner T (1965) The reign of wonder: naivety and reality in American literature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tanner T (2000) The American mystery: American literature from Emerson to DeLillo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Truffaut F (1984) Hitchcock [1967], Rev edn. Simon & Schuster, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walsh, R. (2018). Sense and Wonder: Complexity and the Limits of Narrative Understanding. In: Walsh, R., Stepney, S. (eds) Narrating Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64714-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64714-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64712-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64714-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)