Skip to main content

The ‘Holy Grail’ of Interoperability of Health Information Systems: Challenges and Implications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 647 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 294))

Abstract

Enabling integration between heterogeneous health information systems (IS) across different institutions is attracting growing interest from national and regional governments. “Interoperability of health information systems” is an overall goal to strive for. This empirical paper addresses the challenges of integrating heterogeneous health information systems with the goal of achieving semantic interoperability of patient information within and between all hospitals in a health region. The paper describes a complex development and integration process, and looks into a promising strategy of using openEHR archetypes as an architecture to reach the goal of interoperability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    A Norwegian acronym, in English “Common Deployment of Clinical Systems”.

  2. 2.

    The National ICT Health Trust is responsible for coordinating ICT-related initiatives in the specialized health care services. It is a central agent in bringing about and realizing national efforts and strategies for ICT. The mandate is given by the Regional Health Authorities.

References

  1. Balka, E.S., Whitehouse, S., Coates, S.T., Andrusiek, D.: Ski hill injuries and ghost charts: socio-technical issues in achieving e-Health interoperability across jurisdictions. Inf. Syst. Front. 14(1), 19–42 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knaup, P., Bott, O., Kohl, C., Lovis, C., Garde, S.: Electronic patient records: moving from islands and bridges towards electronic health records for continuity of care. Yearb. Med. Inform. 1, 34–46 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gartner IT Glossary. http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/

  4. European Commission and Directorate-General for Health and Food: Safety, Disruptive Innovation: Considerations for Health and Health Care in Europe. Publications Office, Luxembourg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, D.: How can Chronic Disease Management Programmes Operate Across Care Settings and Providers. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe and European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berg, M.: Accumulating and coordinating: occasions for information technologies in medical work. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW 8(4), 373–401 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellingsen, G., Monteiro, E.: Mechanisms for producing a working knowledge: enacting, orchestrating and organizing. Inf. Organ. 13(3), 203–229 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grisot, M., Hanseth, O., Thorseng, A.A.: Innovation of, in, on infrastructures: articulating the role of architecture in information infrastructure evolution. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 2 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellingsen, G., Monteiro, E., Røed, K.: Integration as interdependent workaround. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82(5), e161–e169 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanseth, O., Lyytinen, K.: Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. J. Inf. Technol. 25(1), 1–19 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Hanseth, O., Williams, R.: From artefacts to infrastructures. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW 22(4–6), 575–607 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7(1), 111–134 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenz, R., Reichert, M.: IT support for healthcare processes—premises, challenges, perspectives. Data Knowl. Eng. 61(1), 39–58 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbons, P., Arzt, N., Burke-Beebe, S., Chute, C., Dickinson, G., Flewelling, T., Jepsen, T., Kamens, D., Larson, J., Ritter, J., et al.: Coming to Terms: Scoping Interoperability for Health Care. Health Level Seven (2007). https://www.hln.com/assets/pdf/Coming-to-Terms-February-2007.pdf

  15. Atalag, K., Beale, T., Chen, R., Gornik, T., Heard, S., McNicoll, I.: openEHR—a semantically enabled, vendor-independent health computing platform. http://www.openehr.org/resources/white_paper_docs/openEHR_vendor_independent_platform.pdf (2016)

  16. Blobel, B., Goossen, W., Brochhausen, M.: Clinical modeling—a critical analysis. Int. J. Med. Inf. 83(1), 57–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beale, T.: Archetypes Constraint-Based Domain Models for Futureproof Information Systems (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Duftschmid, G., Wrba, T., Rinner, C.: Extraction of standardized archetyped data from Electronic Health Record systems based on the Entity-Attribute-Value Model. Int. J. Med. Inf. 79, 585–597 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Santos, M.R., Bax, M.P., Kalra, D.: Dealing with the archetypes development process for a regional EHR system. Appl. Clin. Inform. 3(3), 258–275 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aanestad, M., Jensen, T.B.: Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 20(2), 161–176 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L.: Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT, New Baskerville (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanseth, O., Lundberg, N.: Designing work oriented infrastructures. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW 10(3–4), 347–372 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E.: Understanding Information Infrastructure (1998). http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~oleha/Publications/bok.pdf

  24. National ICT. Service-based architecture for specialized health services (Action 12) (2008). www.nasjonalikt.no

  25. National ICT, Use of archetype methodology for definingmaking available and using clinical information models in health information systems (Action 41) (2012). www.nasjonalikt.no

  26. Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(1), 1–28 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pollock, N., Williams, R.: Software and Organisations: The Biography of the Enterprise-Wide System or How SAP Conquered the World. Routledge, Abingdon (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Line Silsand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silsand, L. (2017). The ‘Holy Grail’ of Interoperability of Health Information Systems: Challenges and Implications. In: Stigberg, S., Karlsen, J., Holone, H., Linnes, C. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64695-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64695-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64694-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64695-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics