Advertisement

An Unintended Consequence…

  • Erica Consterdine
Chapter

Abstract

This concluding chapter summarises the key findings, presents an overarching explanation for policy change and offers explanatory insights for scholars of policy change generally. This case in many ways resembles a critical juncture, as this set of favourable conditions provided a window of opportunity in which structural influences on political action were relaxed. These conditions—strong economy, strong majority government and a weak opposition—coincided at the same time and consequently prompted a moment for political actors to overcome the usual bias towards inertia (in this case a restrictive policy frame). The concluding chapter argues that while the expansionary developments were not caused by one single factor, a set of favourable conditions allowed for a shift in immigration policy and thus calls for complex causality.

References

  1. Balch, A. (2010). Managing Labour Migration in Europe: Ideas, Knowledge and Policy Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis, 14(3), 250–267.Google Scholar
  3. Blunkett, D. (2003). Towards a Civil Society. London: IPPR.Google Scholar
  4. Boswell, C. (2007). Theorizing Migration Policy: Is There a Third Way? International Migration Review, 41(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collings, D., & Seldon, A. (2001). Conservatives in Opposition. Parliamentary Affairs, 54(4), 624–637.Google Scholar
  6. Consterdine, E., & Hampshire, J. (2014). Immigration Policy Under New Labour: Exploring a Critical Juncture. British Politics, 9(3), 275–296.Google Scholar
  7. Gamble, A. (2010). New Labour and Political Change. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(4), 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, P. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hampshire, J., & Bale, T. (2015). New Administration, New Immigration Regime: Do Parties Matter After All? A UK Case Study. West European Politics, 38(1), 145–166.Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, R. (2000). Citizenship and Immigration in Post-war Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, R. (2011, May 18–21). Paradigm and Policy Shifts: British Immigration Policy, 1997–2011. Paper Presented at the Conference on ‘Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective’, The Federal Reserve, Dallas.Google Scholar
  12. Hinnfors, J., Spehar, A., & Bucken-Knapp, G. (2012). The Missing Factor: Why Social Democracy Can Lead to Restrictive Immigration Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  15. Koopmans, R., Michalowski, I., & Waibel, S. (2012). Citizenship Rights for Immigrants: National Political Processes and Cross-National Convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1202–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lahav, G. (1997). Ideological and Party Constraints on Immigration Attitudes in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(3), 377–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mulvey, G. (2011). Immigration Under New Labour: Policy and Effects. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(9), 1477–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Observer. (2003, September 7). Matthew Taylor Profiled. Observer. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/sep/07/society.thinktanks. Accessed 7 Mar 2012.
  19. Odmalm, P. (2011). Political Parties and “the Immigration Issue”: Issue Ownership in Swedish Parliamentary Elections 1991–2010. West European Politics, 34(5), 1070–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Odmalm, P. (2014). The Party Politics of Immigration and the EU. Hampshire: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD. (2009). International Migration: The Human Face of Globalisation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  22. ONS (Office National Statistics). (2012). 2011 Census, Key Statistics for Local Authorities in England and Wales. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census/key-statistics-for-local-authorities-in-england-and-wales/index.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.
  23. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson, E. (2012). History, Heritage and Tradition in Contemporary British Politics: Past Politics and Present Histories. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sassen, S. (1999). Beyond Sovereignty: De-facto Transnationalism in Immigration Policy. European Journal of Migration and Law, 1, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmidt, M. (1996). When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spencer, S. (1994). Strangers and Citizens: A Positive Approach to Migrants and Refugees. London: IPPR/Rivers Oram Press.Google Scholar
  28. Spencer, S. (2007). Immigration. In A. Seldon (Ed.), Blair’s Britain 1997–2007 (pp. 341–360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Statham, P., & Geddes, A. (2006). Elites and the “Organised Public”: Who Drives British Immigration Politics and in Which Direction? West European Politics, 29(2), 248–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity (pp. 1–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Thatcher, M. (1992, May 15). Speech in the Hague (“Europe Political Architecture”). Available from: http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/108296. Accessed 15 May 2012.
  32. Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica Consterdine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Politics and Sussex Centre for Migration ResearchUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations