Advertisement

In Whose Interest? Organised Interests, Policy Networks and Collective Action

  • Erica Consterdine
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter turns to the role of non-state actors in Labour’s immigration policy. Gary Freeman argues that a shift to liberalisation occurs because well-organised pro-immigration clients exercise a disproportionate influence over the policymaking process compared with the unorganised, anti-immigration public. Accordingly, political elites respond to such demands to gain electoral support from interest groups. Testing Freeman’s proposition, this chapter examines whether expansive economic immigration policies in Britain occurred because of organised interests’ lobbying government. The chapter presents a narrative of the activities of non-state actors in economic immigration policymaking under Labour, where the findings reveal that the role of non-state actors in prompting policy change was limited

References

  1. Anderson, S. (2005). Migration: A Business View. In T. Pilch (Ed.), Perspectives on Migration (pp. 34–44). London: The Smith Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Balch, A. (2010). Managing Labour Migration in Europe: Ideas, Knowledge and Policy Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC. (2005, April 22). CBI Boss Rejects Immigration Cap. BBC. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/frontpage/4474997.stm. Accessed 11 Mar 2013.
  4. Bentham, J. (2006). The IPPR and Demos: Think-Tanks of the New Social Democracy. Political Quarterly, 77(2), 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, T. (1998, April 14). Speech to American Finances. New York.Google Scholar
  6. Blair, T. (2004, April 27). Speech to Confederation of British Industry on Migration. London. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/apr/27/immigrationpolicy.speeches. Accessed on 21 Mar 2010.
  7. Blair, T. (2006, September 12). Prime Minister’s Address to the Trade Union Congress. Available from: http://www.tuc.org.uk/about-tuc/congress/congress-2006/prime-ministers-address-congress-2006. Accessed on 16 Mar 2010.
  8. Boswell, C. (2007). Theorizing Migration Policy: Is There a Third Way? International Migration Review, 41(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boswell, C. (2009). Knowledge, Legitimation and the Politics of Risk: The Function of Research in Public Debates on Migration. Political Studies, 57(1), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, K. (2000, July 10). CBI Chief’s Valediction is Upbeat About Euro: Industry Could Cope With the Single Currency at an Exchange Rate of DM 2.85 Sir Clive Thompson Tells Kevin Brown. Financial Times. Google Scholar
  11. Brown, W. (2011). Industrial Relations in Britain Under New Labour, 1997–2010: A Post-Mortem. Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(3), 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns, J. (2003, July 14). Migrants “Exploited” by Shady Employers. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  13. Caldeira, G. A., Hojnacki, M., & Wright, J. R. (2000). The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations. The Journal of Politics, 62(1), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caviedes, A. A. (2010). Prying Open Fortress Europe: The Turn to Sectoral Labor Migration. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. CBI (Confederation of British Industry). (1984). CBI Annual Report 1984. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  16. CBI (Confederation of British Industry). (2002a). Response to the Government’s White Paper on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  17. CBI (Confederation of British Industry). (2002b, April 7). CBI Says Migrants Can Help UK Economy. CBI News Release.Google Scholar
  18. CBI (Confederation of British Industry). (2006a). Consultation Response to Selective Admission: Making Migration Work for Britain. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  19. CBI (Confederation of British Industry). (2006b). Business Summaries: Immigration and Illegal Working. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  20. Cerna, L. (2009). The Varieties of High-skilled Immigration Policies: Coalitions and Policy Outputs in Advanced Industrial Countries. Journal of European public policy, 16(1), 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development). (2005). Survey Report Summer/Autumn 2005. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  22. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development). (2013). The State of Migration: Employing Migrant Workers. London: CIPD. Google Scholar
  23. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development). (2004). Managed Migration. London: CIPD Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Clarke, J., & Salt, J. (2003). Work Permits and Foreign Labour in the UK: A Statistical Review. Labour Market Trends, 111(11), 563–574.Google Scholar
  25. Consterdine, E., & Hampshire, J. (2014). Immigration Policy Under New Labour: Exploring a Critical Juncture. British Politics, 9(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Desai, R. (1994). Second Hand Dealers in Ideas: Think-tanks and Thatcherite Hegemony. New Left Review, I(203), 27–64.Google Scholar
  27. DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). (1999). Skills for the Information Age: Final Report from the Information Technology, Communications and Electronics Strategy Group. Nottingham: DfEE Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Dobson, J., Koser, K., Mclaughlan, G., & Salt, J. (2001). International Migration and the United Kingdom: Recent Patterns and Trends. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  29. DTI (Department for Trade and Industry). (1998). Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy. London: DTI.Google Scholar
  30. Findlay, A. (1994). An Economic Audit of Contemporary Immigration. In S. Spencer (Ed.), Strangers and Citizens (pp. 159–202). London: Oram Press.Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, G. (1995). Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States. International Migration Review, 29(4), 881–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman, G. (2006). National Models, Policy Types, and the Politics of Immigration in Liberal Democracies. West European Politics, 29(2), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glover, S., Gott, C., Loizillon, A., Portes, J., Price, R., Spencer, S., Srinivasan, V., & Willis, C. (2001). Migration: An Economic and Social Analysis. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  34. Grant, W. (1995). Pressure Groups, Politics and Democracy in Britain. Hemel Hempstead: Philip Allen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grant, W. (2000). Pressure Groups and British Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, P. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. HM Treasury. (2000). Productivity in the UK: The Evidence and the Government’s Approach. London: Treasury.Google Scholar
  39. IND (Immigration and Nationality Directorate). (2005). Selective Admission: Making Migration Work for Britain: Consultation Document. London: IND.Google Scholar
  40. IoD (Institute of Directors). (2007). Immigration—The Business Perspective (Policy Paper). London: IoD. Available from: http://www.iod.com/influencing/policy-papers/the-economy/immigration--the-business-perspective. Accessed 18 Apr 2012.
  41. Keefe, W. J., & Ogul, M. (1964). The American Legislative Process. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Kernell, S. (1997). Going Public. New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  44. Kollman, K. (1998). Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kriesi, H., Tresch, A., & Jochum, M. (2010). Going Public in the European Union: Action Repertoires of Collective Political Actors. In R. Koopmans & P. Statham (Eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere (pp. 223–245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lucio, M. M., & Perrett, R. (2009). The Diversity and Politics of Trade Unions’ Responses to Minority Ethnic and Migrant Workers: The Context of the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30(3), 324–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maloney, W. A., Jordan, G., & McLaughlin, A. M. (1994). Interest Groups and Public Policy: The Insider/Outsider Model Revisited. Journal of Public Policy, 14(1), 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Menz, G. (2008). The Political Economy of Managed Migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Menz, G. (2011). Employer Preferences for Labour Migration: Exploring “Varieties of Capitalism”- Based Contextual Conditionality in Germany and the United Kingdom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13(4), 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mulgan, G. (1996). The Market Place of Ideas. In M. D. Kandiah & A. Seldon (Eds.), Ideas and Think Tanks in Contemporary Britain (pp. 90–107). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  51. Observer. (2003, September 7). Matthew Taylor Profiled. Observer. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/sep/07/society.thinktanks. Accessed 7 Mar 2012.
  52. Parvin, P. (2007). Friend or Foe? Lobbying in British Democracy: A Discussion Paper. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
  53. Pautz, H. (2011). New Labour in Government: Think-tanks and Social Policy Reform, 1997–2001. British Politics, 6(2), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Penninx, R., & Roosblad, J. (2000). Introduction. In R. Penninx & J. Roosblad (Eds.), Trade Unions, Immigration and Immigrants in Europe 1960-1993: A Comparative Study of the Actions of Trade Unions in Seven West European Countries (pp. 1–21). New York: Berghan Books.Google Scholar
  55. PMOS (Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman). (2004, February 9). EU Accession States/Immigration. Available from: http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/02/09. Accessed 23 Oct 2012.
  56. Salt, J., & Kitchling, R. T. (1990). Labour Migration and the Work Permit System in the United Kingdom. International Migration, 28(3), 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schlesinger, P. (2009). Creativity and the Experts: New Labour, Think Tanks, and the Policy Process. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Somerville, W. (2007). Immigration Under New Labour. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Somerville, W., & Goodman, S. W. (2010). The Role of Networks in the Development of UK Migration Policy. Political Studies, 58(5), 951–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spencer, S. (1994). Strangers and Citizens: A Positive Approach to Migrants and Refugees. London: IPPR/Rivers Oram Press.Google Scholar
  61. Spencer, S. (2007). Immigration. In A. Seldon (Ed.), Blair’s Britain 1997–2007 (pp. 341–360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Spencer, S. (2011). The Migration Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Statham, P., & Geddes, A. (2006). Elites and the “Organised Public”: Who Drives British Immigration Politics and in Which Direction? West European Politics, 29(2), 248–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stone, D. (1996). Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  65. Telegraph. (2004, March 18). Britain Has Longest Period of Sustained Growth Since the Industrial Revolution. The Telegraph. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1457156/Britain-has-longest-period-of-sustained-growth-since-the-Industrial-Revolution.html. Accessed 9 Nov 2011.
  66. The Guardian. (2004, April 29). Press Review: A Whiff of Cynical Optimism. Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/apr/29/asylum.immigrationasylumandrefugees Accessed 26 May 2013.
  67. TUC (Trades Union Congress). (2005). Managed Migration: Working for Britain—A Joint Statement from the Home Office, CBI and TUC. Press Release. London: TUC.Google Scholar
  68. TUC (Trades Union Congress). (2006a). General Council Statement on European Migration. Press release. Available from: http://www.tuc.org.uk/international-issues/europe/migration/general-council-statement-european-migration. Accessed 13 Jan 2013.
  69. TUC (Trades Union Congress). (2006b). Making a Rights-Based Migration System Work. Press release. Available from: http://www.tuc.org.uk/international-issues/migration/making-rights-based-migration-system-work. Accessed 13 Jan 2013.
  70. TUC (Trades Union Congress). (2007). The Economics of Migration. London: TUC. Available from: http://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/extras/migration.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2013.
  71. Vining, A. R., Shapiro, D. M., & Borges, B. (2005). Building the Firm’s Political (Lobbying) Strategy. Journal of Public Affairs, 5(2), 150–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yee, A. S. (1996). The Causal Effects of Ideas on Policy. International Organization, 50(1), 69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica Consterdine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Politics and Sussex Centre for Migration ResearchUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations