Skip to main content

Explaining CSR Performance with Contextual Factors: Focus on Development Banks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Finance in Central and Southeastern Europe

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

With a stronghold in the institutional theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR), a hypothesis is made on banks’ CSR performance being positively driven with the contextual factors, i.e., countries’ macroeconomic and institutional development and their banking sectors’ development (briefly country development level). Development banks, rather than commercial banks, are at the center of the empirical evidence, mainly because they are perceived to be socially responsible institutions by their definition, as well as the best in class example for commercial banks’ CSR practices in certain country. CSR performance is measured throughout CSR reporting quantity and reporting form following Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. By combining the aforementioned data and the World Bank’s data for 22 European countries in 2013 out of which 15 are Balkan and Eastern European countries and the rest Western European countries, we find out that GDP per capita, research, and development expenditure over GDP, gross savings over GDP, and employment of total labor force are positively related to development banks’ CSR performance, while banking sector variables (net interest margin and regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets) are negatively related to development banks’ CSR. Countries’ institutional development variables are also connected to development banks’ CSR performance, but with rather slight differences between better and lower performing development banks with regard to CSR. Thus, more developed economic systems as well as less profitable banking systems, which have lower level of regulatory burden have higher performance of development banks’ CSR when K-means clustering approach was adopted. An important caveat of the research is that there is a trade-off between cost of banking intermediation and development banks’ CSR performance, while macroeconomic performance and CSR performance are in complementary relationship. Altogether, a conclusion is made that banks’ CSR performance is rather modestly explained by the country development level in the previous empirical works and thus a more general approach when researching and creating public policies about the CSR phenomenon is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Serbia, we took into consideration Export Credit and Insurance Agency of the Republic of Serbia, while for countries which had more than one development bank, we applied the age and transparency criteria, choosing older and more transparent development banks.

  2. 2.

    Private credit bureau coverage and public credit registry coverage report the number of individuals or firms listed by either the private credit bureau or public credit registry with current information on repayment history, unpaid debts, or credit outstanding. Strength of legal rights index measures the degree to which collateral and bankruptcy laws protect the rights of borrowers and lenders.

References

  • Archel P, Husillos J, Larrinaga C, Spence C (2009) Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Account Audit Account J 22(8):1284–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belu C, Manescu C (2013) Strategic corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Appl Econ 45(19):2751–2764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2006) Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: a legitimacy theory perspective. Corp Commun Int J 11(3):232–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2008) Social responsibility disclosure: a study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks. Br Account Rev 40(2):161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev 32(3):946–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco I (2006) Ethics and banking. Int Adv Econ Res 12(1):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1999) Corporate social responsibility—Evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatjuthamard-Kitsabunnarat P, Jiraporn P, Tong S (2014) Does religious piety inspire corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from historical religious identification. Appl Econ Let 21(16):1128–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper R (2012) Financial sector policy and development in the wake of the global crisis: the role of national development banks. Third World Q 33(3):383–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 15(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Luna-Martínez J, Vicente CL (2012) Global Survey of Development Banks. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5969

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers C, Marques A (2016) Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. Account Bus Res 46(2):167–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detomasi DA (2008) The political roots of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 82(4):807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (2006) Governance for sustainability. Corp Gov 14(6):522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Hasan I, Marton K (2014) Institutional development and bank stability: evidence from transition countries. J Bank Financ 39:160–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin Y, Van Rossem A (2009) Corporate governance in the debate on CSR and ethics: sensemaking of social issues in management by authorities and CEOs. Corp Gov 17(5):573–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallén ML, Peraita C (2015) A comparison of corporate social responsibility engagement in the OECD countries with categorical data. Appl Econ Lett 22(12):1005–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53(1):51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannarakis G, Theotokas I (2011) The effect of financial crisis in corporate social responsibility performance. Int J Mark Stud 3(1):2–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Nieto B, Fuertes-Callén Y, Serrano-Cinca C (2008) Internet reporting in microfinance institutions. Online Inf Rev 32(3):415–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyves S, O’Higgins E (2008) Corporate social responsibility: an avenue for sustainable benefit for society and the firm? Soc Bus Rev 3(3):207–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg C-J, von Malmborg F (2003) The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in swedish companies. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 10(3):153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebarajakirthy, C., Thaichon, P. and Yoganathan, D., 2015. Enhancing corporate social responsibility through market orientation practices in bottom of pyramid markets: with special reference to microcredit institutions. J Strateg Mark, forthcoming, doi:10.1080/0965254X.2015.1063680

  • Jiraporn P, Chintrakarn P (2013) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and CEO luck: are lucky CEOs socially responsible? Appl Econ Lett 20(11):1036–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jizi MI, Salama A, Dixon R, Stratling R (2014) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from the US banking sector. J Bus Ethics 125(4):601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper A, Martin RL (2010) After the fall: the global financial crisis as a test of corporate social responsibility theories. Eur Manag Rev 7(4):229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King MR (2010) Mapping capital and liquidity requirements to bank lending spreads. Bank for International Settlements, Working paper, No. 324

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundid A, Rogošić A (2011) Bank online reporting: comparative advantage, formalism or fashion? Glob Bus Econ Anthol 2(2):500–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M-DP (2008) A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int J Manage Rev 10(1):53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev 33(2):404–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne MJ, Gray R (2013) W(h)ither Ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. J Bus Ethics 118(1):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min Han C (2015) Consumer expectations of corporate social responsibility of foreign multinationals in Korea. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 51(2):293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooi E, Sarstedt M (2011) A concise guide to market research: the process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naceur SB, Kandil M (2009) The impact of capital requirements on banks’ cost of intermediation and performance: the case of Egypt. J Econ Bus 61(1):70–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistoni A, Songini L (2013) Corporate social responsibility determinants: the relation with disclosure. In: Pistoni A, Songini L, Herzig C (eds) Accounting and control for sustainability. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Quairel-Lanoizelée F (2011) Are competition and corporate social responsibility compatible? The myth of sustainable competitive advantage. Soc Bus Rev 6(1):77–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph P (2005) Don’t obsess about CR and governance: corporate culture is what counts. Corp Respon Manage 2:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Palomino P, Martínez-Ruiz MP, Martínez-Cañas R (2013) Assessing ethical behaviours in the Spanish banking and insurance industries: evidence and challenges. Int J Hum Resour Manage 24(11):2173–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MA, Cracau D (2015) Cross-country comparison of the corporate social responsibility orientation in Germany and Qatar: an empirical study among business students. University of Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management, Working paper, No. 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi D (2007) Utilitarian, managerial and relational theories of corporate social responsibility. Int J Manage Rev 9(4):347–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skouloudis A, Evangelinos K, Kourmousis F (2010) Assessing non-financial reports according to the global reporting initiative guidelines: evidence from Greece. J Clean Prod 18(5):426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage J 20(3):571–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Surroca J, Tribó JA, Zahra SA (2013) Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Acad Manage J 56(2):549–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne J, du Toit C (2009) A macro-framework for successful development banks. Dev South Afr 26(5):677–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang EWK (1998) A longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in Singapore: the case of the banking, food and beverages and hotel industries. Account Audit Account J 11(5):624–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser W (2008) Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Withisuphakorn P, Jiraporn P (2016) The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR? Appl Econ Lett 23(4):298–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu M-W, Shen C-H (2013) Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: motives and financial performance. J Bank Financ 37(9):3529–3547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young S, Marais M (2012) A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: the implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corp Gov 20(5):432–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Tan J, Park SH (2014) From voids to sophistication: institutional environment and MNC CSR crisis in emerging markets. J Bus Ethics 122(4):655–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Kundid Novokmet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9 Pearson correlation for clustering variables (N = 22)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kundid Novokmet, A., Rogošić, A. (2017). Explaining CSR Performance with Contextual Factors: Focus on Development Banks. In: Goić, S., Karasavvoglou, A., Polychronidou, P. (eds) Finance in Central and Southeastern Europe. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64662-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics