Abstract
In this era of active exploration, a multidisciplinary curriculum must generate a right balance between learning in broader ways and expectations of diverse learners. A solid foundation for monitoring the efficaciousness of learning can be accomplished through activities incorporated and integrated in the curricula, thus making learning and development of competencies become central criteria for institutional effectiveness. Well-designed assessment criteria and procedures to ensure continual improvement in learning would lead to alignment of learning outcomes through integrated assessments. Best practices demonstrate learning through application of knowledge to solve relevant issues in novel situations. Capturing evidence of development of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor competencies in learning helps to meet the goals of educational programs.
Education must enable learners to discover what they need to learn than intake and output static knowledge. Employers and society will need graduates with greater mental agility and adaptability. To ensure continual improvement in learning would require that structured curricula are aligned with the learning outcomes through integrated assessments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Adam, S. (2004) Using learning outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels. Report on United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, 2004, Herriot-Watt University.
Allen, M. J. (2004). Assessing academic programs in higher education. Bolton: Anker Publishing.
American Psychological Association. (2008). Teaching, learning, and assessing in a developmentally coherent curriculum. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Board of Educational Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ed/governance/bea/curriculum.pdf
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Assessment Advice. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Bergeron, J. (2008). Assessment workbook for academic programs. University of Richmond. http://oir.richmond.edu/Assessment.htm
Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: The Open University Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of education objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Dang, Q. A. (2010). ASEM- seminar on credits and learning outcomes. Danish School of Education, Aarhus University.
Developing Outcomes and Objectives: The Learning Management Corporation. http://www.thelearningmanager.com
Georgia State University’s Rubric for Assessment Plans might provide a starting point for creating your own assessment plan rubric. (2012). http://education.gsu.edu/ctl/outcomes/rubricplans.htm
Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
King, P., & Baxter Magolda, M. (1996). A developmental perspective on learning. Journal of College Student Development.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II. The affective domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Maskell, D. (1999). Student-based assessment in a multi-disciplinary problem-based learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 238. http://teaching.unsw.edu.au/constructing-learning-objectives
McCarthy, M. (2001). Aligning learning outcomes, learning activities and assessments. Ireland: The Teaching and Learning Centre, University College Cork.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education. (2006). Characteristics of excellence in higher education: Eligibility requirements and standards for accreditation. Philadelphia. www.msche.org
North Carolina State University’s Internet Resources for Higher Education Outcomes Assessment. (2013). A great collection of online resources for program and course assessment. http://www2.acs.ncsu.edu/UPA/assmt/resource.html.
Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L.. (2005). Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE. www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
Oblinger and Oblinger. (2005). Next Generation Learning Challenges, Educause, http://www.educause.edu/focusareas-and-initiatives/teaching-and-learning/next-generation-learning-challenges.
Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. http://academicaffairs.cmich.edu/caa/assessment/resources/toolkit.shtml
Pusateri, T., Halonen, J. S., Hill, B., & McCarthy, M. (2009). The assessment cyberguide for learning goals and outcomes.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.
William, D. (2004). Keep learning on track: Integrating assessment with instruction. Philadelphia: International Association for Educational Assessment.
Winona State University’s Sample Rubrics page contains hundreds of rubrics for a variety of courses and topics 2011. www.winona.edu/air/rubrics.htm
Yigit, A. S. (2003). Outcome-based program and course assessment. College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sahni, S. (2018). Integrating Assessments in Innovative Learning Process. In: Fardoun, H., Downing, K., Mok, M. (eds) The Future of Higher Education in the Middle East and Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64656-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64656-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64655-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64656-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)