Skip to main content

Victim Capital and Victim Policy Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Victims of Crime

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

  • 837 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on bringing together aspects of the previouse five to present an integrated analysis of how cultural drivers have combined with what amounts to a new network of policy actors and governance structures exerting influence over the development of victim policy in England & Wales since the advent of the 2010 coalition government. This chapter will be split into four sections. The first will offer some theoretical discussion to help conceptualise the process whereby certain types of victims appear to be achieving greater cultural recognition in the modern social (and media) context: acquiring what this chapter will call “victim capital”. The second section will examine the process by which said capital has been accrued by specific types of victims and victimisations, with a particular focus on the cultural drivers behind this phenomenon. The chapter will then turn to examine specifically the contemporary policy network of influencing actors and organisations which now feed into related criminal justice reform, again drawing on the cultural context discussed previously. The chapter will then conclude with some observations concerning the place of “evidence” in criminal justice policy-making in the light of the forgoing analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term fell out of fashion, although has appeared in more recent literature (Davis 2007).

  2. 2.

    See pp. 17, and 57 of this volume.

  3. 3.

    Enacted through the Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act 1994.

  4. 4.

    See p. 57 of this volume.

  5. 5.

    See pp. 201 of this volume.

  6. 6.

    As opposed to “victimogogic capital”.

  7. 7.

    See p. 58 of this volume.

  8. 8.

    On which see p. 22 of this volume.

  9. 9.

    See p. 176 of this volume.

  10. 10.

    See p. 145 of this volume.

  11. 11.

    In reality there are few grounds to believe the case has set any binding legal precedents or thereby changed the existing law in any way.

  12. 12.

    See p. 17 of this volume.

  13. 13.

    [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin).

  14. 14.

    See pp. 33 and 34 of this volume.

  15. 15.

    See p. 34 of this volume.

  16. 16.

    In which the perpetrator drove a car onto the pavement on Westminster Bridge outside the Houses of Parliament, killing four people and then stabbing and killing a police officer stationed at Parliament.

  17. 17.

    The injunction on publication of his name originally ordered by the Court expired in August 2009.

  18. 18.

    Or at least certain components of it, see p. 265 of this volume.

  19. 19.

    See p. 69 of this volume.

  20. 20.

    See p. 180 of this volume.

  21. 21.

    See p. 19 of this volume.

  22. 22.

    If indeed it is in any way meaningful to seperate “social media” from dedicated “news media” in the twenty-first century.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hall, M. (2017). Victim Capital and Victim Policy Networks. In: Victims of Crime. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64589-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64589-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64588-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64589-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics