Skip to main content

Victims in Public Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Victims of Crime

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

  • 842 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter seeks to take up the challenge of examining the place of victims in public policy discourse in England & Wales not just from a critical perspective but, as outlined in the last chapter, from a cultural position as well. It will proceed firstly by reviewing the political and policy landscapes concerning victims of crime in England and Wales up to the establishment of the coalition government in May 2010. It will then move on to trace the development of public policy on victims under that government and those that followed it after the 2015 election of a Conservative administration, through the second ministry of David Cameron and into the premiership of Theresa May following the July 2016 UK referendum on membership of the European Union up until the general election of June 2017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the sake of brevity, this volume will ordinarily refer to ‘policy networks’. See Atkinson and Coleman (1992) for a full analysis and comparison of this differing terminology.

  2. 2.

    Space restrictions require me to circumvent the considerable debate surrounding the meaning of this term, except insofar as to acknowledge Scholte’s (2000) observation that “the only consensus about globalisation is that it is contested” (p. 41).

  3. 3.

    Recommendation No. R. 85 (11).

  4. 4.

    As amended by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

  5. 5.

    Criminal Justice Act 1999.

  6. 6.

    With provisions relating to child witnesses previously being clarified in the Children Act of 1997.

  7. 7.

    s. 34.

  8. 8.

    The Act also introduced so called ‘rape shield’ protection to limit the ability of the defence to cross-examine complainants on their sexual history. To be discussed in more detail in Chaps. 4 and 6.

  9. 9.

    Tampere European Council 15 and 16 October 1999 Presidency Conclusions. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam_en.htm (accessed 06.06.17).

  10. 10.

    s. 32.

  11. 11.

    Although this post was not filled until 2010, see p. 58 of this volume.

  12. 12.

    Which also became known as “Sarah’s Law”, echoing a similar scheme—“Megan’s Law”—in the United States. The cultural significance of this is discussed in Chap. 6.

  13. 13.

    [2000] Crim. L.R. 287.

  14. 14.

    As mandated by the Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004, s. 49(4).

  15. 15.

    Newlove’s first annual report of March 2014 confirms that this is the same role, with the same statutory duties as the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses under the 2004 Act.

  16. 16.

    See p. 182 of this volume.

  17. 17.

    Member of Parliament.

  18. 18.

    On which see pp. 70–71 of this volume.

  19. 19.

    In Scotland the eight preexisting police authorities were merged with the creation of a single Scottish Police Force. The Northern Ireland Police force continued to be overseen by the Northern Ireland Policing Board. In London, the role was given to the elected mayor’s office.

  20. 20.

    Except in relation to adding victims of crime as a group to be consulted on local policing issues though an amendment of the Police Act 1996 (s. 14 of the 2011 legislation).

  21. 21.

    In cities with elected mayors, which were introduced in England & Wales under the Local Government Act 2000, the mayor takes on the roles which would otherwise be under the remit of a PCC.

  22. 22.

    Specifically, s. 42 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.See p. 172 of this volume.

  23. 23.

    In 2017 the remit of PCCs was extended to include overseeing the provision of fire services.

  24. 24.

    See p. 220 of this volume.

  25. 25.

    Resolution of the Council of 10 June 2011 on a roadmap for strengthening the rights and protection of victims, in particular in criminal proceedings, 2011/C 187/01.

  26. 26.

    Although victims must be informed of it if there is one under Article 9 (1) (a).

  27. 27.

    Hansard 13th November 2012, volume 553.

  28. 28.

    Ibid.

  29. 29.

    Ibid.

  30. 30.

    Ibid.

  31. 31.

    Ibid.

  32. 32.

    On which, see Chap. 1 of this volume.

  33. 33.

    The cases are available at http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/applying-eu-law/infringements-proceedings/infringement_decisions/index.cfm?lang_code=EN&r_dossier=&decision_date_from=26%2F01%2F2016&decision_date_to=28%2F01%2F2016&DG=JUST&title=&submit=Search (accessed 09.06.17). The relevant states were: Belgium, Finland, France, Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania, Ireland, Netherlands Luxembourg, Slovenia, Croatia, Cyprus, Latvia, Romania and Slovakia.

  34. 34.

    Replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA.

  35. 35.

    Forced Marriage Protection Orders are civil instruments inserted as section s. 4A of the Family Law Act 1996 by the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 and allow family courts to make wide-ranging order for the purposes of protecting (a) a person from being forced into a marriage or from any attempt to be forced into a marriage or (b) a person who has been forced into a marriage.

  36. 36.

    Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 s. 1.

  37. 37.

    See https://twitter.com/VictimsComm/status/877492035598651393 (accessed 22.06.17).

References

  • APAV and Victim Support Europe. (2009). Project Victims in Europe: Implementation of the EU Framework Decision on the Standing of Victims in the Criminal Proceedings in the Member States of the European Union. Brussel: Victim Support Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M., & Coleman, W. (1992). Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance. Governance, 5, 154–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. (2003). Governing Through Governance: Education Policy Control Under New Labour. Political Studies, 51, 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2013). May: National Crime Agency ‘Not Just a Rebrand’ [online]. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-24435922/may-national-crime-agency-not-just-a-rebrand. Accessed 28 May 2017.

  • Brownlee, I. (1998). New Labour–New Penology? Punitive Rhetoric and the Limits of Managerialism in Criminal Justice Policy. Journal of Law and Society, 25(3), 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (1999). Modernising Government (Cm 4310). London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, L. (2011). Annual Report 2010–2011 Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses. London: Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W., & Perl, A. (1999). Internationalized Policy Environments and Policy Network Analysis. Political Studies, 47, 691–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses in England & Wales. (2011). Victims’ Views of Court and Sentencing Qualitative Research with WAVES Victims. London: Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses in England & Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons Justice Select Committee. (2015). The Victims’ Code and the Victims’ Law [online]. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmjust/164/16407.htm#_idTextAnchor059. Accessed 28 May 2017.

  • Conservative and Unionist Party. (2010). Invitation to Join the Government of Britain. London: Conservative Party Headquarters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. (1997). The Local Governance of Crime: Appeals to Partnerships and Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critcher, C. (2002). Media, Government and Moral Panic: The Politics of Paedophilia in Britain 2000–1. Journalism Studies, 3(4), 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, M., & Heap, V. (2014). Administrating Victimization the Politics of Anti-Social Behaviour and Hate Crime Policy. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, R. (1986). The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology and Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah, E. (1992). Victims and Victimology: The Facts and the Rhetoric. In E. Fattah (Ed.), Towards a Critical Victimology (pp. 29–56). New York: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, H. (1995, November). Rights of Victims in the Criminal Justice System: Rhetoric or Reality? Criminal Law Review, 1: 843–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (1998). A New Britain – A Nation of Victims. Society, 35, 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GMB. (2012). Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority [online]. Available at: https://www.gmb-southern.org.uk/criminal-injuries-compensation-authority/. Accessed 28 May 2017.

  • Goodey, J. (2005). Victims and Victimology: Research, Policy and Practice. Edinburgh: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2009a). Victims of Crime in Policy-Making: Local Governance, Local Responsibility? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(3), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2009b). Victims of Crime: Policy and Practice in Criminal Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2010). Victims and Policy Making: A Comparative Perspective. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, A. (1978). Compensating the Victim of Crime. Criminal Law Bulletin, 14, 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2010). The Coalition: Our Programme for Government. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1990). Victims’ Charter: A Statement of the Rights of Victims. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2001). Criminal Justice: The Way Ahead (Cm 5074). London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2002). Justice for All (Cm 5563). London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2013). Find Out If a Person Has a Record for Child Sexual Offences [online]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/find-out-if-a-person-has-a-record-for-child-sexual-offences. Accessed 26 May 2017.

  • Home Office. (2015). Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in an Intimate or Family Relationship Statutory Guidance Framework. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2016). Monder Slavery Act Review. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, C., Cape, E., Morgan, R., & Sanders, A. (1999). Evaluation of the ‘One Stop Shop’ and Victim Statement Pilot Projects. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvin, R., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., Rüdiger, K., & Zito, A. (2005). The Rise of “New’ Policy” Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government? Political Studies, 53, 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joutsen, M. (1989). Foreword. In HEUNI (Ed.), The Role of the Victim of Crime in European Criminal Justice System (p. 1). Helsinki: HEUNI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearon, T., & Godey, B. (2007). Setting the Scene: A Question of History. In S. Walklate (Ed.), Handbook of Victims and Victimology (pp. 17–36). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laville, S. (2001). Degraded Victim Abandons Anonymity. The Daily Telegraph [online]. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1330709/Degraded-victim-abandons-anonymity.html. Accessed 11 May 2017.

  • Lebeck, C. (2007). Sliding Towards Supranationalism? The Constitutional Status of EU Framework Decisions After Pupino. German Law Journal, 8(5), 501–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2007). Human Trafficking. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberal Democrats. (2010). Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2010. London: Liberal Democrats Party Headquarters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1968). The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Assembly. (2017). Mayor Appoints First Victims Commissioner for London [online]. Available at: https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/key-manifesto-commitment. Accessed 20 June 2017.

  • Mawby, R., & Walklate, S. (Eds.). (1994). Critical Victimology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, I., Edelenbos, J., & Monnikhof, R. (2005). Interactive Policy Development: Undermining or Sustaining Democracy? Public Administration, 83, 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2014). Some Things We Think We’ve Learned Since 9/11: A Commentary on Marc Sageman’s “The Stagnation in Terrorism Research”. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(4), 601–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miers, D. (1991). Compensation for Criminal Injuries. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miers, D. (2014). Offender and State Compensation for Victims of Crime: Two Decades of Development and Change. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2010). Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2012). Getting It Right for Victims and Witnesses. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2013a). Code of Practice for Victims of Crime. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2013b). Improving the Code of Practice for Victims of Crime. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2013c). Victims’ Services Commissioning Framework. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2015a). Code of Practice for Victims of Crime. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2015b). Revising the Victims’ Code. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2016). Lord Chancellor Swearing-in Ceremony [online]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/lord-chancellor-swearing-in-ceremony. Accessed 26 May 2017.

  • Ministry of Justice. (2017). Victims of Crime [online]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/victims-of-crime. Accessed 26 May 2017.

  • Moxon, D., Martin, J., & Hedderman, C. (1992). Developments in the Use of Compensation Orders in Magistrates’ Courts Since October 1988 (Home Office Research Study 126). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlove, B. H. (2014). Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses: Report for the Secretary of State for Justice 2013–14. London: Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlove, B. H. (2015a). A Review of Complaints and Resolution for Victims of Crime. London: Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlove, B. H. (2015b). Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses: Annual Report for 2014–15. London: Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlove, B. H. (2015c). The Silenced Victim: A Review of the Victim Personal Statement. London: Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlove, B. H. (2016). Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses: Annual Report for 2015–16. London: Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. (2009a). Rape: The Victim Experience Review. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. (2009b). Redefining Justice Addressing the Individual Needs of Victims and Witnesses. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, G., & Mawson, J. (2003). Delivering Developed Approaches to Local Governance. Policy & Politics, 31, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, A. (2010). Needs of Victims of Terrorism. In R. Letschert, I. Staiger, & A. Pemberton (Eds.), Assisting Victims of Terrorism (pp. 12–25). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J., & Bomberg, E. (1999). Decision-Making in the European Union. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, O. (2017). Theresa May Is Playing A Smoke and Mirrors Game with Domestic Abuse Legislation. Huffington Post [online]. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/olivia-piercy/domestic-violence_b_15109600.html. Accessed 28 May 2017.

  • Priestley, M. (2002). Whose Voices? Representing the Claims of Older Disabled People Under New Labour. Policy & Politics, 30, 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Office. (2017). The Queen’s Speech 2017: Background Notes [online]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/620838/Queens_speech_2017_background_notes.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017.

  • Reese, C. (2000). The Implementation of the UN Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power in France. The Victimologist, 4, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. (1986). A View from the Shadows: The Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada and the Making of the Justice for Victims of Crime Initiative. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. (1990). Helping Victims of Crime: The Home Office and the Rise of Victim Support in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. (1993). The Social World of an English Crown Court: Witnesses and Professionals in the Crown Court Centre at Wood Green. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. (1998). After Homicide: Practical and Political Responses to Bereavement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. (2004). Constructing Victims’ Rights: The Home Office, New Labour, and Victims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sankoff, P., & Wansbrough, L. (2006). Is Three Really a Crowd? Thoughts About Victim Impact Statements and New Zealand’s Revamped Sentencing Regime. Paper Presented at the 21st International Conference of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law, Brisbane, July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, H. (2017). What Theresa May Has Done for Women. I [online]. Available at: https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/politics/theresa-may-done-women/. Accessed 28 May 2017.

  • Scholte, J. (2000). Globalization: A Critical Introduction. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J., Willmore, J., & Duff, P. (1985). Victims and the Criminal Justice System. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson, L. (2005). Is Your Evidence Robust Enough? Questions for Policy Makers and Practitioners. Evidence & Policy, 1, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. V. (2010). The Stern Review: A Report by Baroness Vivien Stern CBE of an Independent Review into How Rape Complaints Are Handled by Public Authorities in England and Wales. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E., & Davis, M. (2004). Making a Difference? Bringing Children’s and Young People’s Views into Policy-Making. Children & Society, 18, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Waaredn, F. (2006). Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1999). Working with Victims of Crime: Policies, Politics and Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. (2002). Victims. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (3rd ed., pp. 419–456). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hall, M. (2017). Victims in Public Policy. In: Victims of Crime. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64589-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64589-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64588-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64589-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics