Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Interdisciplinary Study: Quantum Leadership and Hybrid Leadership

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2016 (ICCLS 2016)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Leadership paradigm has been changing in terms of meanings as well as notions as part of continual innovation; changing emerging with globalism does change organizations, organizations’ culture, and the expectations of workers from the organizations and also from the leader. The first of these paradigms is quantum leadership that can be explained best with quantum physics’ features like disorder, chaos, uncertainty, and uncontinuity. In this study, hybrid leadership and quantum leadership paradigms are studied separately, firstly quantum leadership. The second leadership paradigm is hybrid leadership by Gronn. Hybrid leadership, on the one side, focuses on the leaders that manage their organizations by legal ways. On the other side, hybrid leaders are expected to show distributed leadership features like being flexible, reliable, cooperative, and active and encouraging the followers. Then, these two leadership paradigms that have the leadership abilities of the twenty-first century are tried to be studied together with an interdisciplinary study in terms of their similarities and differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aktan, C. C. (2007). Yüksek Öğretimde Değişim: Global Trendler ve Yeni Paradigmalar. In C. Can Aktan (Ed.), Değişim Çağında Yüksek Öğretim. İzmir: Yaşar Üniversitesi Yayını.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alşal, A. (2009). Bir Kamu Kurumundaki Orta Düzey Yöneticilerin, Kuantum Liderlik Davranışlarını Gerçeklestirme Düzeyleri. Ankara: Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ufuk Üniveristesi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloğlu, N. (2011). Dağıtımcı Liderlik: Okullarda Dikkate Alınması Gereken Bir Liderlik Yaklaşımı. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stagdill’s handbook of leadership, theory, research and managerial application. Sydney: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2011). Public sector professional identities: A review of the literature. UK: The Open University. Erişim: 08 Nisan 2016, http://oro.open.ac.uk/29793/47/Public_service_professional_identities_a_review_of_the_literature_2012.pdf./.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1959). Leadership theory and administrative behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 259–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boe, M., & Hognestad, K. (2014). Knowledge development through hybrid leadership practices. Journal Of Nordıc Early Chıldhood Education Research, 8(6), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, T. (2003). The leadership evolution: Creating the hybrid leader. The Center for Workforce Excellence, 1–12. http://www.lesaffaires.com/uploads/references/1266_creatingthehybridleader.pdf.

  • Crawford, M. (2012). Solo and distributed leadership: Definitions and dilemmas. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 610–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, L. (2011). Quantum leadership: Succeeding in interesting times. Nurse Leader, 9(1), 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erarslan, L. (2004). Liderlik Olgusunun Tarihsel Evrimi, Temel Kavramlar Ve Yeni Liderlik Paradigmasının Analizi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi Sayı:162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2000). Lider Sarmalında Vizyon. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Kamacı, M. C. (2008). Quantum leadership paradigm. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(6), 865–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Kayman, E. A. (2012). How to be a quantum leader in an intelligent organization. In S. Banerjee & Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership. (s. 247- 251. London: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Bisaso, S. M., & Saeed, F. (2013). Understanding chaos and complexity in education systems through conceptualization of fractal properties. In S. Banerjee & Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership. (s. 147- 161. London: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2009a). From distributed to hybrid leadership practice. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership different perspectives. (s. 197–217. London: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2009b). Leadership configurations. Leadership, 5(3), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2011). Hybrid configurations of leadership. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grinth, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership. London: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Harvey, M., & Lefoe, G. (2014). A conceptual approach for blended leadership for tertiary education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(4), 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasar, N. (1986). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Bilim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayman, E. A. (2008). Türkiye’deki Mesleki Eğitim ve Öğretimin Güçlendirilmesi Projesi (MEGEP) İçindeki Yaygınlaştırıcı Okul Yöneticilerinin Kuantum Liderlik Davranışlarını Gerçekleştirme Düzeyleri. Ankara: Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, C. E. (1935). The elements of leadership. Journal of Coast Artillery, 78, 437–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knickerbocker, I. (1948). Leadership: A conception and some implications. Journal of Social Issues, 4(3), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (1994). From chaos to complexity. Executive Development, 7(4), 16–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memişoğlu, S. P. (2003). Yeni Liderlik Yaklaşımları Işığında Eğitim Örgütlerinde Lider ve Yöneticilere Duyulan Gereksinim. AİBU Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership, theory and practice. UK: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papatya, G., Dulupçu, M. (2000). Thınkıng quantum leadershıp for true transformatıon: The Talısman of “Not To Know” at the threshold of new leadershıp. International Joint Symposium on Business Administration, Gökçeada, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University-Silesian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2003). Quantum leadership: A textbook of new leadership. Massachusetts: Jones and Barlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2009). The quantum leader: Applications for the new world of work. Massachusetts: Jones and Barlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, C. K., & Darling, J. R. (2001). The quantum skills model in management: A new paradigm to enhance effective leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(6), 264–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Q. (2013). Hybrıd leadershıp: A study of the leadershıp (roles and characterıstıcs) of nıne Chınese Unıversıty Presıdents Wıth U.S. Experıences. Doctoral Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. (2015). Leading school networks: Hybrid leadership in action? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 719–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngblood, M. D. (1997). Leadership at the edge of chaos: From control to creativity. Strategy and Leadership, 25(5), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education Inc. http://hplusmagazine.com/2014/03/20/heterarchical-systems-vs-hierarchical-systems/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Berrin Şenses

  2. Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey

    Pınar Temoçin

Authors
  1. Berrin Şenses
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pınar Temoçin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berrin Şenses .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Şefika Şule Erçetin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Şenses, B., Temoçin, P. (2018). An Interdisciplinary Study: Quantum Leadership and Hybrid Leadership. In: Erçetin, Ş. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2016. ICCLS 2016. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64554-4_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation